Financial Services Health Plans & Managed Care Group Health Insurance

Self-Funded Plans

Multi-stakeholder benefits decisions where employer groups, brokers, and members must align on coverage and cost.

Sun Life Cigna Blue Cross Blue Shield Aetna
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision makers (CFO, benefits lead, finance, consultant), timelines, and what financial and operational ‘good’ looks like.

      Alignment Questions

      Getting Comfortable Together

      • Tell us your name, role, and the one outcome you expect from a move to self-funding this year.
      • Who are the core decision-makers we should engage (title and likely final approver)? Options: CFO, Head of Benefits/Total Rewards, Benefits Consultant, VP Finance/Controller, CEO/Owner, Board/Comp Committee, Other
      • What timeline is driving your decision process right now (renewal, fiscal planning, regulatory, other)? Options: Next renewal (0-3 months), 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, No fixed timeline
      • What’s one past change initiative on benefits or finance that felt successful — and why did it work?
      • What keeps you up at night about taking on claims risk directly? Options: Catastrophic claims, Monthly cash volatility, Lack of claims transparency, Administrative burden, Vendor coordination, Regulatory/compliance risk, Other
      • How would you like this discovery conversation to help you walk away—what are the top two decisions you want clarity on?

      If Your Financial North Star Could Speak — What Would It Say?

      • If you had to describe a successful first 12 months of self-funding in one sentence, what would that sentence be?
      • Which of these financial outcomes matter most right now? Rank up to three. Options: Lower long-term premium trend, Reduced per‑employee cost, Predictable monthly cash flow, Retained underwriting gain, Improved budgeting accuracy, Protect against catastrophic exposure
      • What is your target year‑over‑year medical cost change that would make this move feel successful? Options: > -10% (substantial savings), -5% to -10%, 0% to -5%, No change expected — focus on transparency, I don't have a target
      • How do you currently quantify ‘good’ operational performance from a TPA/carrier? List the top 3 metrics you care about.
      • When you think about value, how important is the upside (keeping savings) versus downside protection (avoiding surprise losses)? Options: Upside oriented, Balanced, Downside protection prioritized, Unsure / need modeling
      • If you had to pick one internal audience to convince first (finance vs benefits leadership vs consultant), which would you choose and why? Options: Finance/CFO, Benefits/Total Rewards, Benefits Consultant, Payroll/HR, Executive Leadership

      If a Bad Claims Year Happened Tomorrow — Could You Live With That?

      • What level of single‑claim exposure would you consider intolerable without stop‑loss protection (estimate dollar amount)? Options: <$50k, $50k–$250k, $250k–$500k, $500k–$1M, >$1M, Unsure — need modeling
      • Do you have a preferred stop‑loss structure today (specific attachment, corridor, aggregate)? If so, what is it and why?
      • How do you feel about the trade‑off between lower attachment (more protection) and higher premium/fee cost—what would make you accept more protection? Options: Willing if budget neutral, Willing if clear ROI in 3 years, Prefer to protect minimally, Need scenario modeling to decide
      • Which of the following stop‑loss features are must-haves versus nice-to-haves? Options: Specific attachment level flexibility, Aggregate corridor limits, Reinsurance reimbursement timing, Run‑in/run‑out provisions, Claims cost containment incentives, Stop‑loss policy transparency
      • Tell us about a time you faced a large claim or surprise cost—how did it affect operations, cash flow, and internal trust?
      • How long have you been willing to tolerate claims volatility under current arrangements? Options: Less than 1 year, 1–2 years, 3–5 years, 5+ years, We haven't tolerated volatility — it's been urgent

      How Much Cash Flow Swings Can You Actually Sleep With?

      • If monthly claims were 25% higher than plan for two months, what would be the immediate operational impact? Options: No impact (we have reserves/line of credit), Short-term cash reallocation, Delay projects/payables, Need emergency funding, Unsure
      • Describe your current funding model and cadence (level funding, ASO with claims pay, monthly true-up, banked reserves, etc.). Options: Level funding, ASO – pay claims as billed, Monthly deposits with reconciliation, Funded reserve account, Other
      • Which smoothing or liquidity options are you open to exploring? Options: Rolling reserves, Monthly true-up with smoothing, Bank line of credit, Stop‑loss cash flow triggers, Premium financing, None
      • How quickly do you need stop‑loss reimbursements to occur after a large claim to avoid operational stress? Options: Within 30 days, 30–60 days, 60–90 days, 90+ days, Varies by claim
      • Who in finance will own funding reconciliation and monthly cash forecasting—title and capacity?
      • Have you modeled scenarios for claim spikes and their budgetary impact? If yes, how thorough were they and what surprised you? Options: No modeling, Basic scenarios, Moderate modeling with sensitivities, Extensive stochastic modeling

      What Would Reporting and Analytics Need to Do to Earn Your Trust?

      • If you had one complaint about existing claims visibility, what is it and how long has it bothered you?
      • Which analytics capabilities are non‑negotiable for you? Options: Diagnosis-level drilldown, Provider-level spend, Member cohort trends, Real‑time claim feeds, Monthly funding pack, Custom ad‑hoc reporting
      • How often do you need reporting to feel confident—monthly, biweekly, daily dashboards, or ad‑hoc? Options: Daily dashboard, Weekly, Biweekly, Monthly, Quarterly
      • Who needs access to claims analytics and at what permission levels (finance, benefits, consultant, broker)? Options: Finance (full), Benefits (full), Consultant (read/export), Broker (read only), Senior leadership (summaries)
      • What formats and integrations matter most for your tech stack (API, SFTP, CSV, BI tool connectors)? Options: API (real‑time), SFTP batch, CSV exports, Snowflake/warehouse connector, Power BI/Tableau connector, Other
      • Give an example of a decision you couldn’t make in the past because data arrived late or was incomplete.

      What Would ‘Winning’ Look Like — Beyond Just Saving Money?

      • If you could measure three outcomes 12 months after go‑live to judge success, what would they be?
      • How important are member experience metrics (call responsiveness, claims accuracy, care navigation outcomes) relative to financial metrics? Options: More important, Equally important, Less important, Not considered currently
      • What year‑over‑year percentage change in total medical spend would you celebrate? Options: >10% reduction, 5–10% reduction, 0–5% reduction, No reduction but improved predictability, Other
      • What operational SLAs would make you feel we’re delivering (turnaround times, claims accuracy, reporting delivery)? Select top 3. Options: Claims adjudication turnaround, First‑pass payment accuracy, Provider inquiry response time, Monthly reporting delivery date, Stop‑loss reimbursement timing, Data refresh frequency
      • How will success be reported internally—what cadence, audience, and decision forums will use these metrics? Options: Monthly finance review, Quarterly leadership, Renewal committee, Board/Owners, Ad‑hoc
      • If after 12 months the financial targets are missed but operational goals are met, how would you want to handle renewal decisions? Options: Renegotiate structure, Extend term with improvement plan, Terminate, Escalate to execs for decision

      Deal Makers, Deal Breakers, and the Path Forward

      • What would be an absolute deal breaker for you in a partnership with a TPA/stop‑loss partner? Options: Slow reimbursement, Poor data access, Opaque fees, Weak clinical programs, Inflexible stop‑loss terms, Other
      • What commercial terms or governance commitments would make you comfortable signing today? Options: Fixed admin fee, Transparent pass‑through costs, Guaranteed reporting cadence, Service SLAs with penalties, Renewal governance roles, Other
      • Who needs to sign off and what is the expected approval timeline? Please list names/titles and a target date.
      • What modeling or artifacts do you need from us to move from interest to commitment (cash‑flow scenarios, stop‑loss quotes, member impact analysis)? Select all that apply. Options: Cash‑flow sensitivity models, Specific & aggregate stop‑loss quotes, Claims trend analysis, Provider network impact, Implementation checklist, SLA draft
      • If we were to propose a one‑page pilot or proof period, what would success look like and how long should it run? Options: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, Pilot not desired
      • What are the top three internal objections you expect, and who is best positioned to address each?
      • What next step would make this conversation most valuable to you right now? Options: Request modeling, Schedule stakeholder workshop, Receive sample reporting, Get preliminary stop‑loss terms, Other
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document current funding model, claims experience, vendor landscape, cash flow variability, and data availability.

      Current State

      Starting Point: How You Currently Cover Care

      • Which funding model are you operating under today? Options: Fully insured, Level-funded, Self‑funded (TPA), ASO with insurer, Captive, Other
      • Who currently administers claims and handles stop‑loss—internal team, a TPA, your insurer, or a mix? Options: Internal benefits team, Third‑party administrator (TPA), Insurer/ASO team, Combined partners, Other
      • How long have you been on this funding model? Options: Less than 1 year, 1–3 years, 3–7 years, 7–15 years, 15+ years
      • Describe (briefly) any recent changes that led you to adopt or keep this model.
      • What internal team owns month‑to‑month funding (payroll, benefits, treasury, or finance)? Options: Finance/CFO, Benefits/Total Rewards, Payroll, Shared ownership, Other

      If Your Claims Data Could Be Brutally Honest

      • If your claims data could tell a single blunt headline about your plan today, what would it say?
      • Over the last 12 months, what pattern best describes your claims spending trend? Options: Steady and predictable, Gradually rising, Highly volatile month to month, A single catastrophic spike, Declining
      • What is your typical monthly lag between services rendered and claims reflected in your reports? Options: Less than 7 days, 7–14 days, 15–30 days, 30–60 days, Over 60 days
      • How often do you experience significant adjudication backlogs or denials that require manual intervention? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Rarely, Never
      • Tell us about a recent claim or claims episode that caused the most frustration—what happened and why?
      • Which claims metrics do you trust today, and which do you doubt? (e.g., paid dollars, incurred but not reported, CPT/diagnosis accuracy)

      Are Your Vendors Team Players or Lone Rangers?

      • Do you feel your vendor ecosystem is designed to collaborate toward your goals—or to minimize each vendor's risk? Options: Collaborative and aligned, Mostly aligned but siloed, Fragmented and defensive, We haven’t evaluated this
      • Which vendors currently touch medical claims, network access, RX, stop‑loss, and clinical programs? Options: TPA/Claims Admin, Stop‑loss carrier, PBM, Network/TPN, Care management vendor, Wellness vendor, Other
      • How many separate contracts govern benefits administration and stop‑loss today? Options: One integrated contract, Two (TPA + stop‑loss), Three or more, We’re unsure
      • How easy is it to get consolidated invoicing, reconciliations, and a single view of liabilities across vendors? Options: Easy and timely, Possible but manual, Very difficult, Not possible today
      • Have vendor handoffs ever created an issue that cost you time or money? Please describe the most recent example.
      • Do you have data‑sharing or SLAs in contracts that specify timeliness and formats for claims data? Options: Yes, detailed SLAs and formats, Some SLAs but inconsistent formats, No SLAs, We don’t know

      The Cash Story: When Benefits Surprise the Ledger

      • How often does your benefits funding run differently than the finance team expected for a given month? Options: Almost every month, Several times a year, Rarely, Never
      • What is the typical range of month‑to‑month variance (high to low) in benefit costs as a percentage of budget? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–50%, 50%+
      • When a month spikes, how long does it take to receive stop‑loss reimbursements (if applicable)? Options: <30 days, 30–60 days, 60–90 days, 90+ days, Not applicable
      • What working capital or reserve practices do you have for benefits cash flow (e.g., claims float, funded reserves, letter of credit)? Options: Formal reserve account, Ad‑hoc float with treasury, No reserves, Other
      • Describe the emotions or internal conversations when finance gets surprised by benefits spend.
      • Who on your finance team models benefits volatility and how frequently are those models refreshed? Options: CFO/Controller, Treasury, Benefits analyst, External consultant, We don’t have models

      Data: Windows, Not Locked Vaults

      • When you request claims data today, is the response a useful dashboard or a frustrating data dump? Options: Actionable dashboard + raw extracts, Dashboard only, Raw extracts only, Delayed and inconsistent, I don’t know
      • Which of the following data elements do you have reliable access to (select all that apply)? Options: Member identifiers (de‑identified options), Date of service, Paid amounts, Allowed/negotiated amounts, Diagnosis/CPT codes, Provider NPI/location, Stop‑loss attachment flags
      • How long is the typical reporting lag for a complete claims extract (days between DOS and availability)? Options: <7 days, 7–14 days, 15–30 days, 30–60 days, 60+ days
      • Do you have API access or automated feeds into your analytics tools, or are exports manual? Options: APIs/automated feeds, Scheduled flat‑file feeds, Ad‑hoc manual exports, No automated access
      • What quality issues do you regularly see in claims data (duplicates, mismatched IDs, incomplete codes)? Give examples and frequency.
      • If we wanted to run a 12‑month claims cohort analysis for cost drivers, what existing reports or extracts could you share right away? Options: Monthly paid claims by member, Incurred but not reported (IBNR) estimates, Provider contract files, We cannot share right away, Other

      Decision Makers and Risk Appetite: Who Pulls the Levers?

      • Who ultimately approves changes to funding structure, stop‑loss, and vendor relationships? Options: CFO, Head of Benefits/Total Rewards, Benefits consultant, Board/Executive committee, Finance committee, Other
      • How would you describe your organization’s appetite for funding risk: conservative, balanced, opportunistic, or undecided? Options: Conservative, Balanced/moderate, Opportunistic (high risk for reward), Undecided
      • What timeline do decision‑makers expect for major benefits changes (immediate, within renewal, 12–24 months)? Options: Immediate (next 30 days), Next renewal (3–6 months), 6–12 months, 12–24 months, Undecided
      • Who on your team should we engage to model cash flow scenarios and why?
      • When stakeholders disagree on risk, what is the usual tiebreaker (finance opinion, consultant advice, HR leader, CEO)? Options: Finance/CFO, Benefits consultant, HR/Benefits leader, CEO/Exec sponsor, Other

      Red Lines and Trigger Points: When Do You Act?

      • What single event or metric would trigger you to change vendors or funding approach immediately? Options: A catastrophic claim above X, Repeated adjudication errors, Data access failures, Unexpected cash strain, Regulatory/compliance failure, Other
      • Do you have explicit stop‑loss attachment or aggregate corridor thresholds that are considered unacceptable? If so, what are they?
      • How quickly would you expect a vendor to remediate a critical issue (pay/reconciliation error, data breach, reporting fail)? Options: <24 hours, 48–72 hours, One week, Longer than one week
      • Have you ever exercised contract termination or withheld payment for vendor performance? Please describe the circumstance.
      • Emotionally, what keeps you up at night about benefits risk—cash, reputational, compliance, or people impact? Options: Cash volatility, Employee disruption, Regulatory risk, Reputational exposure, Other

      If We Could Solve One Thing in 12 Months

      • If you could remove one financial or operational headache in the next 12 months, which would move the needle most? Options: Reduce monthly volatility, Faster stop‑loss recoveries, Cleaner claims data, Single vendor accountability, Lower admin fees, Other
      • Which metrics would you use to measure success for that goal (select up to three)? Options: Variance to budget (%), Days to stop‑loss reimbursement, Claims data lag (days), Adjudication accuracy rate, Employee satisfaction with benefits, Other
      • What analytics or reports would have to exist for your team to feel confident about moving forward? Options: Member‑level paid claims extract, Monthly funding cashflow model, Catastrophic claim forecasts, Provider concentration analysis, Custom KPI dashboard, Other
      • Realistically, what internal approvals or resources would be required to pilot a different funding or TPA model?
      • What would success look and feel like to the CFO vs. to the benefits leader—where might their priorities differ?

      Readiness: Can We Move Toward a Model or Pilot?

      • What documents and data could you share within 7–14 days to support modeling (claims extracts, funding statements, stop‑loss contracts)? Options: 12–24 months paid claims extract, Renewal exhibits and stop‑loss policies, Monthly funding statements, Provider contracts, None readily available
      • Who would need to be in the room (or on the call) to approve a pilot scope and timeline? Options: CFO, Head of Benefits, Finance lead, Benefits consultant, TPA/vendor rep, Other
      • What does an acceptable pilot look like for you: a modeling exercise, a time‑limited parallel adjudication, or a phased live migration? Options: Modeling only, Parallel adjudication/test, Phased live migration, Small population pilot (e.g., one region), Other
      • What are your preferred next steps and ideal timeframe for exploring change (options, modeling, pilot)? Options: Start immediately (within 30 days), Within 2–3 months, At renewal (3–6 months), 12+ months, Undecided
      • Is there anything else we should know about your current state that would help us design a useful analysis or pilot?
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define target financial outcomes, acceptable stop‑loss structure, required analytics, and success metrics for year‑over‑year performance.

    Discovery Questions

    Getting Comfortable: Quick Financial Snapshot

    • Briefly, what are the top two financial goals you're hoping self-funding will achieve in the next 12–24 months?
    • Which of these outcomes matters most to your executive team right now? Options: Lower total cost, Predictable monthly cash flow, Access to savings in favorable years, Better vendor leverage and transparency, Improved clinical outcomes, Other
    • What is your organization's approximate annual medical spend (total claims)? Options: <$5M, $5M–$25M, $25M–$100M, $100M–$500M, >$500M, Unsure
    • What level of year‑over‑year medical spend volatility would you consider acceptable? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, >20%, Unsure
    • Who owns the financial modeling and decision authority for benefits funding today? Options: CFO, Benefits Lead/Head of Benefits, Treasury/Finance team, Benefits consultant/advisor, HR leader, Other

    If the Budget Blew Up Tomorrow, Whose Job Is It?

    • If a single catastrophic claim doubled one month's cash requirement, who in your organization would feel the impact first—and how?
    • Which internal stakeholders must be involved in decisions about stop‑loss attachment changes or funding cadence? Options: CFO, Benefits Director, Treasury/Finance, Payroll, Benefits consultant, Board/Exec sponsor, Other
    • How do conversations between benefits and finance/treasury usually go when claims spike—collaborative, reactive, or strained? Options: Collaborative and proactive, Reactive but coordinated, Frustrated/strained, Siloed/no shared plan, Unsure
    • Have you run stress‑test scenarios that model extreme claim months or cluster events? Options: Yes — regularly, Yes — ad hoc, Planned but not done, No, Unsure
    • Describe a past incident where claims volatility required an emergency action—what happened and what did your team learn?

    What 'Good' Feels Like — Beyond Savings

    • Imagine we hit the financial target—beyond being under budget, what would make this feel like a strategic win to you?
    • Which KPIs would you expect to present at renewal to demonstrate success? Options: Total cost PMPM or PMPY, Medical trend vs. market, Cash flow variance, High‑cost claim frequency, Member satisfaction/experience, Clinical program ROI, Stop‑loss recoveries
    • What timeline do you expect to see measurable improvement in those KPIs? Options: 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, Multiple years, Unsure
    • How important are non‑financial outcomes (speed of adjudication, member experience, data access) relative to hard dollar results? Options: Cost is primary, Cost and non‑financial outcomes equal, Member experience is primary, Unsure
    • Share one story, metric, or slide you would use to convince your CFO at renewal that this change was successful.

    Where the Risk Really Lives — Let's Name It

    • What kinds of claims, member cohorts, or provider behaviors keep you awake at night—and why?
    • Which claim drivers contribute most to your cost variability? Options: High‑cost chronic conditions (oncology, dialysis), Single‑event catastrophics (transplants, trauma), Behavioral health spikes, Specialty drug spend, Maternity clusters, Provider billing variation, Other
    • Do you currently carry stop‑loss and, if so, what does your specific attachment structure look like? Options: No stop‑loss / Not applicable, Specific attachment < $100k, Specific $100k–$250k, Specific $250k–$500k, Specific $500k–$1M, Specific > $1M, Unsure
    • How willing would you be to shift specific attachment or aggregate corridor in exchange for greater premium certainty or lower volatility? Options: Very willing, Somewhat willing, Not willing, Need more modeling/data
    • How would an unexpected change to your stop‑loss terms affect your willingness to remain self‑funded—emotionally and operationally?

    Data, Reports, and the Stories They Don't Tell

    • If your analytics dashboard told you one inconvenient truth about your claims today, what would you want it to reveal first?
    • Which analytics and reports do you rely on today (or wish you had)? Options: Claim‑level drilldowns, High‑cost member alerts, Provider cost variation, Cash flow forecasting, Trend projections vs. budget, Care management impact, Ad hoc claims exports/API access
    • How timely and complete are your current claims data feeds? Options: Near real‑time (<7 days), Monthly with 1–2 week delay, Quarterly, Incomplete or inconsistent, Unsure
    • Which delivery formats and cadences are must‑haves for your finance and benefits teams? Options: Monthly funding report, Daily cash forecasts, API/raw claims access, Quarterly trend deck, Ad‑hoc data extracts, Scheduled interactive dashboards
    • What questions do your consultant(s) or auditors ask today that you can't answer with existing data?
    • How comfortable are you sharing member‑level data (PHI under BAAs) with partners for analytics and program improvement? Options: Fully comfortable with PHI under agreements, Only de‑identified data, Not comfortable, Requires legal review

    If We Could Design Your Perfect Protection Plan

    • What's the single trade‑off you'd be willing to accept between premium cost and certainty of worst‑case exposure?
    • Which stop‑loss structures would you consider for balancing cost and certainty? Options: High specific attachment / lower premium, Low specific attachment / higher premium, Aggregate corridor with aggregate stop‑loss, Quota/share reinsurance, Hybrid structures
    • Do you prefer smoothing funding with levelized monthly payments or aligning funding to actual claims (variable months)? Options: Levelized monthly funding, Pay‑as‑claims (variable), Hybrid (buffer + true‑up)
    • How important is carrier financial strength and claims pay reliability compared to price? Options: Financial strength >> price, Both equally important, Price >> financial strength, Depends on attachment levels
    • Would you consider performance‑linked arrangements (shared savings, gainsharing) tied to clinical or utilization programs? Options: Yes, Maybe with guardrails, No
    • Describe any internal constraints (budget cycles, reserve policies, accounting rules, board limits) that would limit which protection designs we can offer.

    Signals of Success and Who Keeps Score

    • If next year's renewal looks good on paper but the CFO remains unconvinced, what would probably be missing or untrusted?
    • Which metrics must appear in a monthly performance dashboard to keep your leadership confident? Options: PM/EE (per member costs), Claims variance vs expected, High‑cost claim count and trend, Cash flow variance, Stop‑loss recoveries and timing, Utilization and admission rates, Member satisfaction
    • Who should sit on the governance team that reviews renewals and ongoing performance? Options: CFO, Benefits Director/Head of Benefits, Treasury/Finance, HR Leader, Benefits consultant/advisor, TPA representative, Stop‑loss underwriter, Clinical/program lead, Other
    • How often should joint performance reviews occur to give you confidence (and what cadence would be tolerable operationally)? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Semi‑annual, Annual, On‑demand after threshold events
    • What variance thresholds (percentage or dollar) should automatically trigger an urgent remediation conversation? Options: <5% or <$50k, 5–10% or $50k–$250k, 10–20% or $250k–$1M, >20% or >$1M, Custom threshold — specify below
    • If we deliver on these outcomes, what new capability or decision would you be able to make next year that you can't make today?
  3. Solution Experience

    Use the customer’s claims profile and finance constraints to show how self‑funding + our TPA/stop‑loss model delivers the desired outcomes and controls risk.

    Experience Meetings

    • Current State & Consequence Alignment
    • Financial Modeling Workshop — Cashflow & Stop‑Loss Scenarios
    • Claims Experience & Operational Proof
    • Integrated Solution Experience — Scenario Walkthrough & Validation
    • Executive Alignment & Go/No‑Go

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Identify a preferred stop‑loss and operational commitment package to carry forward.
    • Customer: Confirm which stop‑loss candidate(s) should be taken into the Solution Experience for operational proof.
    • Seller: Prepare a short list of recommended funding cadence options and sample reserve levels tied to each candidate structure.
    • Recap Agreed Current State and Consequences
    • Prove how TPA adjudication and clinical programs alter claims outcomes for the customer's high‑cost cohorts.
    • Tie operational improvements directly to the previously quantified financial consequences.
    • Agree pilot metrics and a short validation plan to demonstrate the operational impact in production.
    • Seller: Provide a 3‑month pilot design with measurement plan and expected financial impact ranges by cohort.
    • Customer: Identify pilot cohort (e.g., top 20 high‑cost members or a population segment) and assign data steward.
    • Seller: Share SLA targets and sample vendor contract clauses that enforce the operational commitments discussed.
    • Reaffirm Current & Future State One‑Sentences
    • Prove the future state with concrete monetary and operational outcomes using the customer's data.
    • Receive explicit validation from customer executives that the modeled outcomes meet their objectives.
    • Introductions & Meeting Objectives
    • Seller: Produce an executive one‑page for each scenario summarizing net employer exposure, cashflow impact, and operational benefits.
    • Customer: Confirm validation responses in writing and select the candidate structure to advance.
    • Seller: Prepare a short list of remaining open items required for Mutual Commit (commercial, SLAs, attachments).
    • Executive Summary of Outcomes
    • Secure executive approval to proceed to Solution Scope/Mutual Commit or capture a clear list of remaining deal blockers.
    • Assign owners and timelines for the outstanding items required to finalize commercial and operational terms.
    • Ensure the customer understands the verified benefits, residual risks, and the path to binding terms.
    • Customer: Provide formal decision (approve to proceed or list of deal breakers) within agreed timeline.
    • Seller: Prepare draft Mutual Commit term sheet including selected stop‑loss attachments, SLAs, and reporting commitments.
    • Seller & Customer: Schedule Solution Scope kickoff meeting with named owners and deliverables.
    • Agree a single clear sentence that states the current state and where it breaks.
    • Quantify the top-line financial consequences (annual and monthly) and at least one catastrophic claim scenario.
    • List and assign responsibility for any missing data required for modeling.
    • Customer: Deliver finalized loss runs, funding cadence, and any reinsurance contracts referenced in the discussion.
    • Seller: Produce a preliminary loss-run validation summary and note of data gaps within 3 business days.
    • Customer: Confirm risk tolerance (target worst‑case cash exposure) and any internal funding constraints.
    • Model Assumptions Review
    • Produce an agreed month‑by‑month cashflow model showing baseline employer exposure.
    • Demonstrate how specific stop‑loss attachment points and aggregate corridors change employer liability.
    • Identify 2–3 candidate stop‑loss structures that meet finance constraints for deeper operational proofing.
    • Seller: Deliver the working model file with scenario tabs and a 1‑page executive summary of outcomes.
    • One‑Sentence Current State
    • Residual Risks & Mitigations
    • Baseline Monthly Cashflow Build
    • Scenario 1 — Base Case (Expected Year)
    • Claims Driver Deep Dive
    • Scenario 2 — Stress Case (Catastrophic Claim)
    • Claims Profile Confirmation
    • Operational Workflow & SLA Proof
    • Specific Stop‑Loss Scenarios
    • Final Q&A on Commercial/Operational Impacts
    • Aggregate Protection & Corridor Effects
    • Consequence Quantification
    • Decision & Next Steps to Mutual Commit
    • Clinical & Vendor Interventions
    • Scenario 3 — Upside Case (Lower Utilization)
    • Stress Testing & Sensitivity
    • Validation Checkpoints
    • Validation with Customer Data
    • Sign‑off on Current State & Data Gaps
    • Document Sign‑off & Owner Assignment
    • Select Preferred Structure & Next Steps
    • Decision Points & Next Steps
    • Pilot Metrics & Proof‑of‑Concept Design
  4. Solution Scope

    Define plan design, claims administration boundaries, stop‑loss structure, data access, reporting cadence, and measurable SLAs.

    Scope Configuration

    • Medical Claims Adjudication and Payment
    • Dental Claims Adjudication and Payment
    • Vision Claims Adjudication and Payment
    • Provider Network Access and Contracting
    • Member Eligibility and Enrollment Maintenance
    • Utilization Management (Authorizations and Reviews)
    • Complex Care and Case Management
    • Specific Stop-Loss Claims Administration
    • Aggregate Stop-Loss Reconciliation and Payments
    • Claims Analytics Dashboard and Data Export
    • Monthly Funding and Cash Flow Reporting
    • ACA 1094/1095 Production and Filing
    • HIPAA and ERISA Compliance Support
    • Provider Payment Negotiation and Recovery
    • Subrogation and Coordination of Benefits Recovery

    Scope Questions

    Medical Claims Adjudication and Payment

    • Do you require medical claims adjudication services for this plan? Options: Yes, No
    • Which member populations should be covered under medical adjudication? Options: Active employees, Dependents, COBRA, Retirees, Other
    • Estimate average monthly medical claim lines or total paid medical spend (choose closest) Options: Less than $100k, $100k–$500k, $500k–$2M, More than $2M, Unknown / provide details
    • Do you require custom adjudication rules (e.g., employer-specific copays, reference pricing, manual pricing overrides)? Options: None / standard plan logic, Minor custom rules, Significant custom rules
    • What payment methods, remittance formats, and AP integrations are required (ERA/EDI, ACH, virtual card, accounting GL mapping)?

    Dental Claims Adjudication and Payment

    • Do you require dental claims adjudication and payment services? Options: Yes, No
    • Which dental plan designs are in scope (PPO, DHMO, indemnity, schedule of benefits)? Options: PPO, DHMO, Indemnity, Schedule of benefits, Other
    • Estimated monthly dental claim lines or expected monthly dental spend Options: Less than $10k, $10k–$50k, $50k–$200k, More than $200k, Unknown
    • Do you require dental-specific provider pricing rules or bundling logic (e.g., UCR vs fee schedule)? Options: Standard UCR/fee schedule, Custom fee schedule, Contracted rates only
    • Are there existing dental vendor relationships or carve-outs to coordinate with? Options: Yes, No

    Vision Claims Adjudication and Payment

    • Do you require vision claims adjudication and payment services? Options: Yes, No
    • Which vision products are offered (routine coverage, materials only, medical vision, enhanced benefits)? Options: Routine vision, Materials only, Medical-related vision, Enhanced / premium coverage, Other
    • Estimated monthly vision claim volume or monthly spend Options: Less than $5k, $5k–$25k, $25k–$75k, More than $75k, Unknown
    • Do you require bundled billing for vision benefits or separate remittance? Options: Bundled with medical, Separate vision remittance, Depends on vendor
    • Are there vendor / network partners for vision already contracted that we must integrate? Options: Yes, No

    Provider Network Access and Contracting

    • Do you require access to an existing provider network or a new/custom network? Options: Use our existing network, Use vendor network, Build / customize a new network
    • What network types do you expect (select all that apply)? Options: National PPO, Regional PPO, Narrow network, Custom employer network, IDN / hospital system
    • Do you require assistance with provider contracting, credentialing, or onboarding? Options: Yes, contracting, Yes, credentialing, Yes, both, No
    • Do you have existing rate schedules, provider agreements, or stop‑loss coordination clauses to ingest? Options: Yes — provide documents, No
    • Are provider payment recovery or retrospective negotiations expected as part of network services? Options: Yes, No

    Member Eligibility and Enrollment Maintenance

    • Do you require ongoing eligibility and enrollment maintenance (active updates, terminations, life events)? Options: Yes, No
    • What is the expected cadence for enrollment files and updates? Options: Daily, Per payroll, Weekly, Monthly, Ad-hoc API
    • Which file formats and transport methods are required for enrollment feeds? Options: SFTP/FTPS, API (real-time), EDI 834, Secure portal / CSV, Other
    • Do you need eligibility reconciliation and reporting to match payroll and billing? Options: Yes, No
    • Are COBRA, retirees, leaves of absence, or special population rules part of eligibility maintenance? Options: Dependents, COBRA, Retirees, Leaves of absence, Other

    Utilization Management (Authorizations and Reviews)

    • Do you require prior authorization and utilization review services? Options: Yes, No
    • Which UM programs are needed (select all that apply)? Options: Pre-service authorization, Concurrent review, Retrospective review, Prior authorization for high-cost services, Pharmacy prior auth
    • Do you expect use of standard clinical criteria (e.g., InterQual, MCG) or custom criteria? Options: Standard criteria, Custom criteria, Hybrid
    • What turnaround time SLAs are required for authorizations? Options: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, Custom
    • Provide expected monthly authorization volume or high-cost service frequency

    Complex Care and Case Management

    • Do you require complex care management or high-cost case management programs? Options: Yes, No
    • Which member cohorts should be targeted (select all that apply)? Options: High-cost members, Chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, CHF), Maternity, Behavioral health, Transplant / oncology
    • What are the primary goals for case management (cost containment, clinical outcomes, member experience)?
    • Do case managers need direct access to medical records or authorized clinical notes? Options: Full clinical access, Claims-only access, Limited access with releases
    • What reporting cadence and outcome metrics do you require for complex care (e.g., per-case ROI, readmission rates)? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Per-case

    Specific Stop-Loss Claims Administration

    • Do you require administration of specific stop-loss claims? Options: Yes, No
    • What specific stop-loss attachment points and contract terms do you anticipate (provide numeric attachments or ranges)?
    • What is the expected process for claimant reporting and reimbursement (timing, documentation required)?
    • Are there pre-existing stop-loss policies or legacy claims to coordinate with? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you require integration between stop-loss reimbursements and the plan's cashflow/funding reports? Options: Yes, No

    Aggregate Stop-Loss Reconciliation and Payments

    • Do you require aggregate stop-loss reconciliation and payment services? Options: Yes, No
    • What reconciliation cadence do you prefer for aggregate stop-loss (monthly, quarterly, annual)? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, Other
    • What corridor or aggregate attachment structure are you considering (please provide details)?
    • Should aggregate reconciliation be integrated into your general ledger or treasury systems? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you expect smoothing mechanisms or cash reserves to manage aggregate volatility? Options: Yes, No

    Claims Analytics Dashboard and Data Export

    • Do you require a claims analytics dashboard and regular data exports? Options: Yes, No
    • Which data views and drill-downs are essential (select all that apply)? Options: By diagnosis / DRG, By provider or facility, By member cohort, By claim type (inpatient/outpatient/ER), Pharmacy analytics
    • What export methods and formats are required (CSV/Excel, SFTP data dump, API, BI connector)? Options: CSV/Excel, SFTP / data warehouse, API, BI connector (Snowflake/Redshift), Other
    • What data latency do you require (near real-time, daily, weekly, monthly)? Options: Near real-time, Daily, Weekly, Monthly
    • Are there custom KPIs or benchmarking requirements to include in dashboards? Options: Yes — list KPIs, No

    Monthly Funding and Cash Flow Reporting

    • Do you need monthly funding calculations and cash flow reporting for plan payments? Options: Yes, No
    • Which funding model do you plan to use? Options: Pay-as-you-go, Advance funding, Hybrid, Custom
    • Which line items must appear on funding reports (select all that apply)? Options: Paid claims, IBNR / incurred but not reported, Stop-loss recoveries, Administrative fees, Cash balance
    • Do you require automated integration of funding reports into your accounting/treasury system? Options: Yes, No
    • Who are the stakeholders that should receive funding reports and with what cadence?

    ACA 1094/1095 Production and Filing

    • Do you require ACA 1094/1095 production and filing services? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you require electronic e-filing with the IRS and/or paper distribution to employees? Options: E-filing, Employee mail distribution, Both, Undecided
    • What is the covered population size to be reported for ACA purposes? Options: Under 500, 500–2,000, 2,001–10,000, More than 10,000
    • Do you have prior-year ACA exceptions or multi-entity filing considerations? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you require year-end reconciliations and audit support for ACA submissions? Options: Yes, No
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, stop‑loss attachments, service SLAs, reporting commitments, and roles for renewal governance.

    Agreement Modules

    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Pricing & Fee Schedule Addendum
    • Stop‑Loss Policy & Attachment Schedule
    • Funding & Payment Schedule
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA)
    • Data Access & Reporting Commitment
    • Compliance & Privacy Addendum (BAA/DPA)
    • Renewal & Governance Charter
    • Acceptance Criteria & Go‑Live Conditions
    • Change Order & Amendment Process
    • Execution & Signature Log
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm data feeds, enrollment files, banking/funding setup, access controls, and escalation owners are in place.

      Readiness Questions

      Who’s in the Room (and Who Moves the Needle)?

      • Who from your organization will be actively involved in evaluating a move to or optimizing self‑funding (select all who will influence the final decision)? Options: CFO / Finance, Head of Benefits / Total Rewards, HR / Payroll, Benefits Consultant / Broker, Actuarial / Risk, General Counsel / ERISA Counsel, CEO / COO, Other (please name)
      • How does final sign‑off typically happen for benefits financial commitments—single approver, committee, or board-level approval? Options: Single approver (name/role), Executive committee, Finance committee, Board approval required, Varies by size of commitment
      • What timeline are you aiming for to decide on a new TPA/stop‑loss or transition to self‑funding? Options: Immediate (next 30 days), This quarter, By renewal (3–6 months), 6–12 months, No set timeline
      • Who would own the financial model and cash flow monitoring once a self‑funded plan is live? Options: CFO / Treasury, Benefits team, HRBP / Payroll, External consultant, Shared ownership, Undecided

      What’s Actually Happening with Your Dollars?

      • When you look at last 12 months of claims, what single pattern surprised you most? Options: High-cost outliers, Seasonal spikes, Consistent trend upward, Large one-time catastrophic month, Data gaps prevented insight, Other (explain)
      • Which funding model are you operating under today? Options: Fully insured, Level-funded, Admin services only (ASO) + stop‑loss, Self‑funded with captive, Hybrid, Not sure / need to confirm
      • How predictable have your monthly cash requirements been over the last two years (PMPM variance or number of months >20% above budget)? Options: Very predictable (few/no large variances), Moderately predictable, Often volatile (several months >20%), Extremely volatile (multiple catastrophic months)
      • Which claims data feeds do you currently receive and how timely are they? Options: Real‑time or daily claims, Weekly claims files, Monthly summary reports, Ad‑hoc reports only, No consistent claims feed
      • Tell us about one recent claims or vendor data issue you wish had been handled differently—what happened and what did it cost you (time, dollars, trust)?

      Where It Actually Hurts (and How Often It Comes Up)

      • If a single pain point had to be fixed this year to keep leadership comfortable with self‑funding, what would it be? Options: Cash flow volatility, Stop‑loss clarity and placements, Claims accuracy and speed, Access to usable data, Vendor coordination and accountability, Other (specify)
      • How many times in the last 12 months did claims activity trigger a formal conversation with finance or the executive team? Options: Monthly or more, Quarterly, A couple of times, Once, Never
      • Have catastrophic claims in the last 3 years required special funding actions (waivers, loans, or board approvals)? If yes, briefly describe frequency/impact. Options: Yes — multiple times, Yes — once, No
      • How do these recurring issues feel for you and the team—annoying, risky, paralyzing, or energizing (briefly explain)? Options: Annoying, Risky, Paralyzing, Energetic / Opportunity
      • Which vendor relationship causes the most friction today (TPA adjudication, network, stop‑loss carrier, pharmacy, analytics)? Options: TPA adjudication, Network / PPO vendor, Stop‑loss carrier, Pharmacy / PBM, Analytics / Data vendor, Multiple / All of the above

      Questioning What You’ve Always Taken for Granted

      • What belief about stop‑loss or self‑funding, if proven false, would change your willingness to proceed? Options: Stop‑loss will fully protect cash, TPA transparency is limited but acceptable, Savings are guaranteed over time, Vendor consolidation reduces risk, We can afford short‑term volatility
      • Where have you accepted a 'normal' level of service or data delay because changing vendors felt harder than tolerating the problem? Options: Claims speed, Reporting accuracy, Integration with payroll, Provider network issues, Customer service / escalations
      • How confident are you in the accuracy of the enrollment and eligibility feeds that would drive funding and adjudication? Options: Highly confident, Mostly confident, Some concerns, Significant concerns / gaps
      • If you could remove one internal barrier to change (budget process, executive risk aversion, procurement complexity), which would you pick and why?

      If Numbers Could Talk: What Outcome Actually Matters?

      • Which single financial outcome would make a move to our TPA + stop‑loss model a clear win for you next year? Options: Reduced PMPM vs. current, Lower variance in monthly funding, Reduced catastrophic exposure, Improved cash flow predictability, Better forecasting / budgeting accuracy
      • What target ranges would you consider acceptable for year‑over‑year cost variability and trend? Options: <5% variability, 5–10%, 10–20%, >20%
      • Which KPIs would you want in the executive dashboard (select up to 4)? Options: PMPM spend, Loss ratio, Months cash at risk, Number of catastrophic claims, Claims turnaround time, Net savings vs. actuarial
      • How often do you want reconciliations and executive funding briefs once live? Options: Weekly, Bi‑weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Event‑driven only
      • What would a successful first 12 months look and feel like to you—quantitatively and emotionally?

      Controls You Won’t Compromise On

      • Which operational control is non‑negotiable for your team (pick one)? Options: Real‑time claims visibility, Strong stop‑loss attachment/structure, Direct access to raw claims files, Strict SLAs and penalties, Segregated banking / funding controls
      • How do you prefer access controls and user permissions to be handled for sensitive claims data? Options: Role‑based access with audit logs, Centralized access via benefits team, Vendor limited views only, Full direct access for finance/actuarial
      • What frequency and format of reconciliation would satisfy both payroll and treasury teams? Options: Daily feeds + monthly reconciliation, Weekly summaries + monthly detailed, Monthly detailed only, Custom cadence (specify)
      • What level of SLA (turnaround time, accuracy) do you expect from your TPA and stop‑loss partners? Options: Best‑in‑class (tight SLAs + penalties), Industry standard SLAs, Flexible SLAs with escalation, Unsure—need guidance
      • Describe any reporting or audit requirements driven by internal governance or external regulations we should be aware of.

      Deal Breakers, Deal Makers, and the Roadblocks in Between

      • What single factor would make you walk away from negotiating a self‑funded arrangement today? Options: Unacceptable stop‑loss terms, Lack of data transparency, Inability to control cash flow, Poor references / service history, Executive veto
      • What evidence or proof points would most reduce your risk perception (claims audit, reference client of similar size, parallel adjudication results, pricing guarantees)? Options: Claims audit, Peer reference, Parallel adjudication test, Guaranteed pricing structure, Detailed servicing roadmap
      • What internal due diligence or committee approvals remain to be completed before a final agreement? Options: Finance review, Legal / ERISA review, Procurement, Executive / Board review, Actuarial validation
      • Are there procurement or vendor selection rules (RFP, number of vendors, mandatory checks) we should follow? Options: Formal RFP required, Informal competitive process, Sole source allowed, Procurement involvement only at final stage
      • What internal champions or skeptics should we loop in early to smooth approval?

      A Small, Low‑Risk Step That Could Change Everything

      • If we offered a low‑risk pilot or parallel adjudication test, what outcome from that test would make you want to proceed? Options: Matching or better claims accuracy, Improved adjudication speed, Clearer cash projections, No surprises in catastrophic claim handling, Strong service responsiveness
      • What specific data would you be comfortable sharing first to run an initial assessment (e.g., 12 months claims, enrollment, premium history)? Options: 12 months claims, Enrollment + eligibility files, Premium and funding history, Stop‑loss claims detail, None / need confidentiality discussion
      • How soon could your team commit to a technical kickoff and data share under an NDA? Options: This week, Within 2 weeks, Within a month, 3+ months, Undecided
      • Who should we name as the single point of contact to coordinate the pilot, data requests, and executive updates?
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule cutover tasks, assign owners, run parallel adjudication tests, and train payroll/HR on funding cadence.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify claims flow, reporting accuracy, stop‑loss attachments, and first‑month funding reconciliation against acceptance criteria.

      Validation Questions

      Who’s in the room (and who signs the checks)?

      • Who will be involved in evaluating funding, vendor selection, and renewal decisions? Options: CFO, Head of Benefits/Total Rewards, Finance team, Benefits consultant/broker, HR/Payroll lead, General counsel/ERISA counsel, Other
      • Which single person or title do you expect will have final sign-off on changing funding approach or stop‑loss structure? Options: CFO/Finance leader, Head of Benefits/Total Rewards, Board/Owner, CEO/COO, Shared approval (Finance + Benefits), Other
      • What’s your current stance on transitioning from fully insured to self-funding? Options: Actively pursuing change, Exploring options, undecided, Curious but risk-averse, Committed to fully insured for now
      • How do you prefer to receive updates and analytical deliverables during an evaluation (format and cadence)? Options: Weekly briefings, Bi-weekly deep-dive meetings, Monthly summary dashboards, Ad hoc requests only, Shared workspace with real-time access, Other
      • In one short sentence, what is the primary reason your team is exploring changes to funding or vendors today?

      Is volatility quietly eroding your plans?

      • How often does claims volatility derail your monthly cash forecasts or capital planning? Options: Every month, Several times a year, Around once a year, Rarely, Never
      • When a high-claim month hits, what is the typical financial impact (select the range closest to reality)? Options: < 1% of payroll, 1–3% of payroll, 3–5% of payroll, 5–10% of payroll, >10% of payroll
      • How do you currently smooth or fund months with unexpected claims (select all that apply)? Options: Cash reserves, Line of credit, Reserve account with carrier/TPA, Monthly true-up billing, No formal smoothing mechanism, Other
      • Who in your organization owns the cash reserve and liquidity strategy for benefits? Options: Finance treasury, CFO, Benefits/HR, Shared ownership, Not defined
      • When volatility happens, how does it affect your team emotionally and operationally? Give a short example of the last time it caused friction.

      What don’t your reports tell you (but should)?

      • If your analytics vanished tomorrow, what critical decisions would you no longer be able to make?
      • Which of these data feeds do you currently receive from your administrator or carrier? Options: Paid claims (EOB/837), Raw adjudication detail, Encounter/institutional files, Enrollment files, Provider network discounts, Pharmacy data, None of the above
      • How timely and complete are the data feeds you actually get? Options: Daily, near real-time and complete, Weekly, largely complete, Monthly with frequent gaps, Delayed by multiple months, We don’t get usable feeds
      • Which metrics do you trust now for steering vendor performance and plan design? Options: Trend by month, Per member per month (PMPM), Top diagnoses, High-cost claimants list, Provider-specific spend, Member-level utilization
      • When you ask for an ad hoc analysis or a drill-down, what is an acceptable turnaround and what is the reality?

      Are you paying for care you can actually change?

      • Roughly what portion of annual medical spend do you believe is avoidable or manageable with better clinical programs and plan design? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, >30%
      • Which clinical or cost-containment programs are currently in place? Options: Care management / case management, Utilization review / pre-authorization, Chronic condition programs, High-cost claim review, Care navigation, Pharmacy management, None
      • How do you currently measure the impact of those programs (examples and frequency)?
      • Have you previously tried to modify network strategy, carve in/out services, or change benefit design to lower spend? What stopped or supported that change?
      • How do members typically react when cost or clinical programs change—resistance, acceptance, or neutral? Options: Mostly resistant, Mixed reactions, Generally accepting, Not sure / varies

      If renewal were happening today, what would keep you up at night?

      • What single renewal outcome would make you decline a recommended change or vendor?
      • Which renewal levers are highest priority for you this cycle? Options: Stop‑loss attachment points, Aggregate corridor/aggregate stop‑loss, Plan design changes, Administrative fee reductions, Provider network strategy, Funding cadence
      • What stop‑loss structure have you historically been comfortable with (specific attachments or % of expected claim)? Options: Low attachment (protects against moderate risk), Medium attachment, High attachment (employer retains more risk), We vary by year, No stop‑loss previously
      • How many renewal scenarios do you expect to see before you feel comfortable making a decision? Options: 1–2, 3–4, 5–7, More than 7, Unsure
      • Who beyond the usual benefits team must sign-off on renewal assumptions (e.g., treasury, CFO, board)? Options: Treasury/finance, CFO, Executive leadership, Board/owners, Benefits consultant alone, Other

      What does success actually feel like—beyond ‘lower cost’?

      • If we returned 12 months after launch and you called this engagement a success, list the top three outcomes you would cite.
      • Which of these success metrics matter most to your organization? Options: Medical trend reduction, Reduced cash variance, Improved claims adjudication speed, Timely, actionable data access, Provider cost savings, Member satisfaction / NPS, Clinical outcomes improvement
      • Which timeframe feels realistic for you to see measurable change from new funding or vendor decisions? Options: 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, More than 24 months
      • How would achieving these outcomes change how you engage with your broker/consultant or internal stakeholders?
      • Would you be willing to commit to an annual joint governance and performance review if it meant more predictable outcomes? Options: Yes, Maybe with conditions, No

      What could quietly sink this transition?

      • What hidden barrier, if unaddressed, would almost guarantee failure of a move to self‑funding or a new vendor?
      • Which of these operational risks concern you most right now? Options: Poor data quality, Slow or inaccurate claims adjudication, Payroll/enrollment errors, Insufficient stop‑loss terms, Vendor integration failures, Internal political resistance
      • Do existing vendor contracts (networks, PBM, etc.) limit what you can change in the short term? Options: Yes—significant constraints, Some constraints but manageable, No constraints, Not sure
      • How confident are you that payroll and enrollment files can be accurate and timely on day one of a transition? Options: Very confident, Confident with effort, Low confidence, Not confident
      • Who would be the escalation owner inside your organization for funding disputes or material claim issues? Options: CFO/Finance leader, Benefits director, HR/Payroll lead, Assigned project manager, Not yet identified

      What’s the smallest step that proves this can work?

      • What’s the least disruptive pilot or proof you’d accept to validate modeling, claims flow, and reporting?
      • Would you be open to a parallel adjudication or reconciliation pilot before full cutover? Options: Yes—parallel adjudication, Yes—limited population pilot, Only modeling initially, No, prefer direct cutover
      • How much historical claims detail are you willing to share for modeling and stop‑loss placement? Options: 24+ months, 12–24 months, 6–12 months, Less than 6 months, None
      • What reporting cadence during a pilot would make your finance and benefits teams comfortable? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Ad hoc on request
      • Which internal approvals are needed to run a pilot (select all that apply)? Options: CFO/Treasury, Benefits/HR, Legal/Compliance, IT/Security, Board/Owners, None / fast-track
  7. Success

    Review outcomes against success metrics, confirm ongoing reporting cadence, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Quarterly Success Review (QSR)
    • Monthly Reporting & Operational Cadence Sync
    • Issues & Enhancements Governance Board
    • Data Validation & Analytics Deep Dive
    • Renewal & Continuous Improvement Planning

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Establish a repeatable reconciliation cadence to prevent future metric drift.
    • Document any minor report changes requested for the next monthly package.
    • Finalize and publish the monthly reporting template and distribution list.
    • Create a data‑feed remediation ticket with owner, root cause, and target resolution date for any exceptions.
    • Schedule automated delivery of reconciled funding reports to finance stakeholders.
    • Review Open High‑Impact Issues
    • Ensure high‑impact issues are tracked with owners and timelines until resolved.
    • Prioritize enhancement requests based on customer value and operational risk.
    • Agree on the protocol and SLA for the shared issue/enhancement channel to reduce ambiguity.
    • Authorize items moving to the implementation roadmap or require further scoping.
    • Create/assign tickets for approved enhancements and critical issue RCAs with owners and due dates.
    • Publish the shared channel protocol document and escalation matrix to stakeholders.
    • Schedule targeted working sessions for any enhancements requiring detailed scoping.
    • Objective & One‑Sentence Data State
    • Validate that the data sources and ETL produce accurate inputs for the success metrics.
    • Resolve or assign owners for any metric anomalies with clear remediation timelines.
    • Agree on any necessary baseline or model adjustments and document them for governance.
    • Welcome & Objectives
    • Run a full reconciliation job and deliver corrected datasets or a mitigation plan within the agreed SLA.
    • Update metric documentation (definitions, calculation queries) and publish to the shared knowledge base.
    • Schedule follow‑up validation once ETL fixes are applied and confirm sign‑off by analytics owner.
    • One‑Sentence Future State & Renewal Objective
    • Use validated outcomes to form a recommended renewal position that aligns financial and operational objectives.
    • Identify specific changes to the offering or reporting that will drive the next period's success metrics.
    • Agree on a clear decision timeline and list of approvers to prevent last‑minute renewal risks.
    • Assign owners to produce the renewal packet and updated SOW/SLAs for review.
    • Prepare and circulate the renewal packet (performance summary, modeled scenarios, recommended terms) for approver review.
    • Document any agreed changes to reporting or SLAs and include them in the renewal SOW draft.
    • Schedule the formal renewal decision meeting with CFO and benefits leadership on the agreed timeline.
    • Confirm whether success metrics have been met and obtain explicit customer acceptance or documented gaps.
    • Translate performance variance into financial consequence recognized by the CFO and finance team.
    • Agree on remediation or improvement actions with owners and timelines for any unmet metrics.
    • Reconfirm the ongoing reporting cadence and executive recipients based on QSR findings.
    • Produce an executive one‑page QSR summary (metrics, dollar impact, decisions) and circulate to the governance group.
    • Owner assigned to each gap to deliver remediation plan and ETA before the next QSR.
    • If metrics require rebaseline, update acceptance criteria and publish a signed amendment to the success metrics.
    • Meeting Objectives & Pre‑work Review
    • Lock down the monthly report contents and recipients so stakeholders receive consistent, actionable information.
    • Ensure data feeds are healthy or identify owners and timelines for data remediation.
    • Confirm funding reconciliation steps and sign‑off owners to eliminate month‑end surprises.
    • One‑Sentence Current State
    • Enhancement Backlog Prioritization
    • Reporting Package Walkthrough
    • Performance Snapshot vs Renewal Targets
    • Data Completeness & Freshness Review
    • Decision: Move to Roadmap vs. Triage
    • Financial Scenarios & Modeling
    • Metric Reconciliation Sample
    • Data Feed & ETL Health
    • Outcome Metrics Review
    • Financial Consequence & Cash Flow Impact
    • Proposed Changes to Scope or Reporting
    • Root Cause Triage for New Critical Issues
    • Investigate Anomalies
    • Funding & Cash Flow Reconciliation
    • Shared Channel Rules & SLAs
    • Governance & Decision Timeline
    • Proof Points: Claims & Program Impact
    • SLA/TAT Performance Review
    • Model & Baseline Adjustments
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.