Health, Education & Government Healthcare Providers Value-Based Care & Population Health

Physician Network Development

Clinical, operational, and financial complexity where patient outcomes, revenue, and compliance all intersect.

Evolent Health Privia Health Optum Health Catalyst
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, physician influence, timeline, and what 'good' looks like for executives and clinical leaders.

      Alignment Questions

      How we got here — a quick scene-setter

      • Who are you and what’s the single most important outcome you’ve been asked to deliver this year related to physician networks?
      • Which title best describes your role in decisions about physician alignment and network strategy? Options: Chief Strategy Officer/CSO, VP/Director, Physician Enterprise, President, Physician Enterprise, ACO Executive/Leader, CMO/Clinical Leader, Other
      • Roughly how many employed or closely affiliated physicians are in scope for this effort? Options: Under 100, 100–299, 300–999, 1000+, Unsure
      • Tell us about one recent moment — a meeting, a report, a conversation — that made this initiative feel urgent.
      • Which of these is your primary driver for change right now? Options: Protect referral volume from competitors, Reduce physician employment cost growth, Close specialty/geography network gaps, Prepare for value-based contracts, Improve physician engagement and governance, Other

      Are we comfortable letting referrals slip away?

      • How many referral relationships do you estimate have moved to competitor systems in the last 12 months? Options: None / minimal, Some visible losses (1–5%), Moderate losses (5–15%), Significant losses (15–30%), Severe losses (30%+), Don't know
      • Give one or two concrete examples of referral shifts you've watched happen — which specialties, what triggered the move, and how leaders reacted.
      • How do those losses feel inside the organization — embarrassment, denial, urgency, or something else? Options: Urgency to act, Frustration/Blame, Denial/minimization, Confusion, Resignation, Other
      • What short-term and long-term business consequences are you most worried about if this trend continues?
      • Which data sources currently tell you about leakage and retained referrals? Options: Claims/admit data, EMR referral logs, Payer reports, Third-party analytics, Anecdotal/physician feedback only, Other

      What’s quietly driving your employment and alignment costs?

      • Are you confident the current physician compensation and employment model is sustainable — or is it quietly fueling the problem? Options: Sustainable, Some unsustainable elements, Clearly unsustainable, Unsure
      • Which of the following cost drivers are most material for you right now? Options: Guarantees/guaranteed income, High PTO/benefits burden, Malpractice/subsidies, Excessive FTE per clinic, Inefficient referral management, Other
      • How transparently do physicians understand how their pay is tied to referrals, quality, or system goals? Options: Very clear, Somewhat clear, Confusing, Not at all
      • Share an example where a compensation design or employment term created unintended behavior or costs.
      • If we could change one compensation or employment lever quickly, which would move the needle most for you? Options: Reduce guarantees, Tie to referral retention, Quality/value incentives, Productivity redesign, Standardize benefits, Other

      Where are the gaps that let patients and revenue walk out the door?

      • If I asked you to point to the three specialties or service lines where our network is most fragile, which would you name and why?
      • Across your service area, where do patients need to go outside the system most often — neighboring system, ambulatory surgical center, or independent specialists? Options: Competing health system, Independent specialists, ASC or outpatient centers, Out-of-market tertiary centers, Other
      • What geographic pockets show the highest referral leakage or lowest coverage for high-demand specialties? Options: Urban core, Suburban clusters, Rural counties, Satellite clinics, Multiple/varied
      • How would you quantify the gap right now (e.g., wait times, uncovered zip codes, percent unmet demand)? Please share the most reliable metric you track.
      • Which patient populations or payers are most affected when those gaps show up? Options: Medicare, Medicaid, Commercial, Self-pay/uninsured, Dual-eligible, Other

      Who pulls the levers — and who quietly says no?

      • When a major physician alignment decision comes up, who actually gets the final sign-off — and who has informal veto power? Options: Board/Executive Committee, CSO/CEO, Physician Enterprise President, CMO/Medical Staff, Large physician groups/clinician influencers, Other
      • Tell us about a clinical leader whose support would make or break success — what motivates them and what worries them?
      • How formalized is your governance for physician alignment and network decisions today? Options: Well-defined charter and processes, Some committees with unclear authority, Ad-hoc/leader-driven, No formal governance
      • How do frontline physicians typically express concerns — through formal channels, leaders, or quietly in conversations? Options: Formal governance, Department leaders, Direct to executives, Informal hallway conversations, Not expressed
      • What would 'good' look like to your executives versus your clinical leaders — list the two top expectations each group would use to say 'we're succeeding'.

      If we flipped the script — what would success actually feel like?

      • What single measurable outcome would make leadership say this engagement was worth it — referral retention, cost reduction, network coverage, or something else? Options: Referral retention percentage, Employment cost reduction, Network adequacy by specialty/zip, Value-based contract readiness, Physician engagement scores, Other
      • What target ranges feel realistic for that outcome over 12 and 36 months? Options: 12 months: low / 36 months: aspirational, 12 months: modest / 36 months: meaningful, 12 months: aggressive / 36 months: transformative, Unsure — need benchmarking
      • Which leading indicators would you want to see in month 3, 6, and 12 to feel confident progress is real? Options: Referral retention trends, New recruit pipeline, Comp alignment implemented, Governance cadence started, Analytics dashboards live, Other
      • How much risk tolerance do leaders have for disruptive changes to physician contracts or referral patterns? Options: High — willing to move fast, Moderate — phased approach, Low — prefer minimal disruption, Depends on specialty
      • What would success feel like to patients in your communities — faster access, local specialty coverage, lower costs, or something else? Options: Faster access, Local specialty coverage, Better-coordinated care, Lower out-of-pocket costs, Clearer referral pathways, Other

      What’s stopped good ideas from becoming reality before?

      • When past network or compensation initiatives stalled, what was the proximate cause — politics, data gaps, funding, or execution? Options: Politics/physician resistance, Insufficient data, No committed funding, Operational overload, Poor governance, Other
      • Describe a time you pushed a change and the physicians responded in an unexpected way — what happened and what did you learn?
      • How ready is your data environment to support referral-level analytics and tracking (claims, referrals, attribution)? Options: Ready today, Partially ready — some gaps, Major gaps — needs work, We don't know
      • Which stakeholders must be involved before you can confidently start execution (names, roles, or groups)? Options: C-suite, Physician enterprise leadership, Finance/Comp, Operations/Access, IT/Analytics, Medical staff leaders, Payer contracting
      • If we recommended a change that risked short-term revenue but improved long-term retention, how would your leadership evaluate it? Options: Accept with business case, Require pilot/guardrails, Unlikely to accept, Depends on specialty

      Small bets, measurable wins — what's our first move?

      • If we agreed on a 90-day proof-of-progress, what one thing must happen in that period to demonstrate we're on track? Options: Referral retention baseline established, Compensation pilot designed, Top specialist recruitment prioritized, Governance charter signed, Analytics dashboard live, Other
      • What specific data access do we need to start (claims, referrals, HR/payroll, scheduling), and who owns each source?
      • Who should be our sponsor and who will be the day-to-day owner inside your organization?
      • What would success criteria look like for the 90-day window — name up to three measurable acceptance criteria?
      • Realistically, when can your team commit to initial interviews, data pulls, and a governance kickoff? Options: Immediately / this week, In 2–4 weeks, Within 1–3 months, Longer / need internal prep, Unsure
      • Are there any non-starters or absolute boundaries we must respect as we design a plan (culture, financial limits, political red lines)?
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document referral patterns, employment cost drivers, network gaps, and physician sentiment that block target outcomes.

      Current State

      Starting Where You Are

      • Give a brief snapshot of the network or service area we're mapping (size, geographies, anchor hospitals, and any recent consolidations).
      • Which of these best describes your organization’s primary structure for physician relationships? Options: Mostly employed, Mostly affiliated/independent, Hybrid (mix of employed and affiliated), TIN/ACO-led network, Other
      • What is the approximate count of PCPs and specialists each (provide ranges if exact numbers are not handy)? Options: <50, 50–199, 200–499, 500–999, 1000+
      • Describe the top 3 strategic priorities for the system this year (e.g., grow market share, manage employment cost, prepare for value contracts).
      • Which payer relationships or contract types are most material to your referral economics right now? Options: Commercial HMO/PPO, Medicare FFS, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid/Managed Medicaid, Risk-bearing ACO or VBP contracts, Other
      • How would you rate your confidence that leadership shares a single view of the network’s biggest operational problem? Options: High alignment, Some alignment with key differences, Fragmented views across execs, No consensus

      What’s Actually Happening with Referrals?

      • How surprised would you be if a competitor already owns the referral flows you think are ‘safe’? Options: Very surprised, Somewhat surprised, Not surprised, Unsure
      • Over the past 12 months, which direction have your total in-system referral volumes trended by specialty? Options: Increasing materially, Slight increase, Flat, Slight decline, Declining materially
      • Which specialties have shown the largest percentage leakage of referral volume to competitors (name up to 5 and % if known).
      • What are the top reasons you hear from referring physicians when they send patients elsewhere? Options: Access/wait times, Perceived quality or outcomes, Physician relationships/personal ties, Insurance/network status, Specialty/service not available, Other
      • How reliable is your current referral attribution—are you tracking origin PCP, episode attribution, and downstream specialists consistently? Options: Yes - robust attribution, Partial attribution across systems, Limited attribution (sampled), No reliable attribution
      • Can you share a specific recent example where referral loss materially impacted volume, margins, or payer negotiations?

      Where the Dollars Are Getting Eaten

      • Which employment cost drivers do you suspect are growing faster than the value they deliver? Options: Guarantees/compensations, Over-hiring/low productivity, Locum/contract coverage, Facility overhead allocated to employed groups, Malpractice/benefits, Other
      • Do you currently separate productivity-based compensation from alignment/incentive payments in your reporting? Options: Yes, clearly separated, Mostly separated with gaps, No, blended and opaque, Unsure
      • Which specialties or service lines have driven the largest employment cost increases in the last 24 months?
      • How often do you run a total cost of ownership (TCO) model for employed physicians that includes lost referral impact and facility costs? Options: Quarterly, Semi-annually, Annually, Rarely/Never
      • Tell us about a hire or expansion that ended up costing more than expected—what were the hidden or underestimated elements?
      • What financial thresholds (ROI, payback period, referral retention %) would make an employment spend acceptable to your CFO?

      The Soft Signals: How Physicians Really Feel

      • If physicians could vote with their feet, how would you describe the current mood in your employed and affiliated practices? Options: Highly engaged and aligned, Somewhat engaged with pockets of frustration, Disengaged/transactional, Actively considering leaving
      • What are the three most common complaints or hidden resentments you hear from physicians about system policies, comp plans, or governance?
      • Have you measured physician sentiment formally (e.g., surveys, focus groups)? If so, share cadence and key trends. Options: Quarterly survey, Annual survey, Ad hoc focus groups, No formal measurement
      • How often do physician frustrations translate into visible behaviors that affect referrals (e.g., direct scheduling elsewhere, suggesting competitors to patients)? Options: Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely, Never
      • Are there physician leaders (informal influencers) whose views significantly sway referral behavior? Who are they and why?
      • Describe a recent conflict between system initiatives and physician preferences—how was it resolved and what was the fallout?

      Gaps in Care and Access That Bite Outcomes

      • What high-demand services or specialties do your patients commonly travel outside the network to receive? Options: Cardiology (interventional/EP), Ortho/joint replacement, Neurosurgery/spine, Oncology/infusion, Pediatrics/subspecialty, Other
      • Where are your longest patient wait times or largest appointment backlogs today (by specialty or location)?
      • How do access gaps vary by payer (e.g., MA patients facing different barriers than Medicare FFS)? Options: Significantly different by payer, Minor differences by payer, No meaningful difference, Unsure
      • What is your current recruitment pipeline for critical specialties—time to hire, key obstacles, and success rate?
      • To what extent are telehealth, APPs, or extended clinic hours being used to mitigate access issues? Options: Widely used across specialties, Used selectively, Pilot stage, Not used
      • Name two places where insufficient network capacity has directly harmed a contract or patient outcome.

      Data Realities — What Can You Actually See?

      • If asked to prove referral retention for a payer tomorrow, would your data team produce a credible report within 48 hours? Options: Yes — ready now, Yes — with up to one week prep, No — needs substantial work, Unsure
      • Which data sources are reliably available for analysis today? Options: EHR/EMR appointments and encounters, Claims (internal and payer), Practice management / scheduling, Provider directories, HR/compensation data, Other
      • Where do you experience the biggest data quality problems (matching patients, provider IDs, missing referral reason, timeliness)?
      • Do you currently have dashboards that combine referral flows, compensation, and access metrics in one view? Options: Yes, integrated dashboards, Partial dashboards across teams, No, separate reports only, No reporting
      • Who owns the master provider directory and attribution logic today? Options: Clinical IT/analytics, Revenue cycle, Network operations, Provider relations, Other
      • How frequently can you produce provider-level referral trend slices (weekly, monthly, quarterly)? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Ad hoc/rarely

      Governance, Decision Rights, and Speed

      • Who in your organization can veto a network change (hire, closure, comp change) and how often is that power exercised?
      • How long does a typical decision from proposal to final approval take for physician network changes? Options: <2 weeks, 2–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, >12 weeks
      • Which governance body currently sets compensation philosophy and who sits on it?
      • Describe one governance bottleneck that has blocked a recruitment or retention action recently.
      • How are physicians represented in decision-making forums (formal votes, advisory, informal influence)? Options: Formal voting members, Advisory representatives, Informal influencers only, No physician representation
      • What escalation path exists when a local market needs a fast staffing or access decision? Options: Clear rapid-approval path, Ad hoc executive escalation, No formal escalation, Unsure

      What Success Looks Like — Small Wins and Red Flags

      • What one tangible change in 90 days would convince you this initiative is on the right track?
      • Which KPIs would you prioritize to judge early progress (pick up to 4)? Options: Referral retention %, Time-to-appointment/wait time, Provider productivity (wRVUs or visits), Recruitment time-to-fill, Compensation alignment score, Patient leakage by specialty
      • What outcomes would feel unacceptable and require course correction within the first 6 months?
      • Are there existing contractual or regulatory KPIs we must preserve during any transition? Options: Yes — payer contract KPIs, Yes — regulatory/certification KPIs, Both, None/Not sure
      • How will success be communicated internally to sustain momentum (who needs to hear what and how often)?
      • Which stakeholder groups must visibly approve progress milestones for the program to continue? Options: C-suite, Physician leadership, Finance/CFO, Operations, Board/Trustees, Other

      Ready to Act — Constraints and Non-Negotiables

      • What single condition would cause leadership to stop this effort immediately?
      • Which of the following are hard constraints we must design around? Options: Budget cap, Union/collective bargaining, Regulatory limits, Payer contract restrictions, Provider FTE caps, None of the above
      • Are there political or cultural fault lines between hospitals/markets that could block network-wide solutions? Options: Yes — clear fault lines, Some tensions but manageable, No significant political barriers, Unsure
      • What is the absolute earliest and latest timeline you must adhere to for any pilot or rollout? Options: Immediate (0–30 days), 30–90 days, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Flexible
      • Who must sign off on budget and scope for a pilot engagement? Options: CFO/Finance, CSO/Strategy, Physician Enterprise Head, Operations/COO, Board, Other
      • What minimum level of physician participation or buy-in would you require to move forward with a pilot? Options: Specific leaders only, 20–49% of impacted physicians, 50–74%, 75%+, Not specified

      Quick Audit — Access, Data, and People We’ll Need

      • If you had to name the single most critical dataset we must have access to in week one, what is it?
      • Which of these data or access items can you make available within 30 days? Options: Claims data (payer), Referral logs/appointment data, Provider compensation files, Provider directories and credentials, HR FTE and org charts, None immediately available
      • Who are the three internal contacts we should engage first for analytics, provider relations, and clinical leadership?
      • Are there security, legal, or payer approvals that typically add significant lag to data sharing? If so, which ones? Options: Data use agreements, BAA/HIPAA review, Payer approvals, Legal/contract review, None
      • What prefered communication cadence do you want for discovery findings (weekly check-ins, biweekly summaries, milestone reviews)? Options: Weekly check-ins, Biweekly summaries, Monthly milestones, Ad hoc as needed
      • What would be the quickest win we could pull from the data to demonstrate immediate value (e.g., top 10 leaky PCPs, a specialty wait-time snapshot)?
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define measurable success signals for referral retention, network adequacy, compensation alignment, and value-based readiness.

    Discovery Questions

    Starting with What Matters Most

    • If this network initiative succeeded, what single outcome would make your leadership say “we got exactly what we needed”? Options: Protect referral share in key specialties, Reduce physician employment cost growth, Close geographic/specialty network gaps, Meet value-based contract targets, Improve physician engagement/retention, Other
    • Which three outcomes should be prioritized together (pick up to 3)? Options: Referral retention, Network adequacy by specialty/ZIP, Compensation alignment, Value-based readiness, Quality/performance metrics, Physician experience/engagement
    • How quickly does leadership expect to see measurable progress on those outcomes? Options: Immediate (0–3 months), Short (3–6 months), Medium (6–12 months), Long (12–24 months), No firm timeline
    • Who absolutely must be satisfied for this initiative to move forward (list roles/titles)?
    • How would you describe the emotional stakes for those leaders—are they anxious, skeptical, eager, or defensive about network change? Options: Very anxious, Cautiously eager, Skeptical, Defensive/protective, Neutral

    If We Don’t Fix It, Who Loses Sleep?

    • What would happen to patient access, margins, or referral volumes if referral leakage and network gaps continue for another 12–24 months? Options: Significant revenue loss, Manageable but growing risk, Operational strain only, Little immediate impact, Unsure
    • Estimate the current annual financial exposure (choose range) tied to lost referrals, over-staffed specialties, or misaligned compensation. Options: <$1M, $1M–$5M, $5M–$15M, $15M–$50M, >$50M, Unsure
    • Which specialties or geographies are already showing clear declines in retention or access? Tell us the top 3 and why they matter.
    • Have recent physician departures or competitor hirings visibly changed referral patterns? Share one concrete example.
    • How does continuing the status quo affect physician morale and your ability to recruit new talent? Options: Damaging recruitment & morale, Some impact on recruitment, Minimal impact, Positive (unlikely)

    Where Do Your Referrals Actually Flow?

    • Which referral sources are leaking most—outpatient clinics, employed physicians, hospitalists, or independent community physicians? Options: Employed specialists, Primary care (employed), Independent PCPs, Outpatient clinics/ASCs, Hospitalists, Other
    • How well can you currently trace referral origin and destination in your data (select one)? Options: Full attribution by clinician and zip, Partial attribution (some specialties only), Referral tracking exists but unreliable, No reliable referral attribution
    • What systems contain your referral and claims data today (EHR, HIE, claims vendor, custom BI)? Select all that apply. Options: Epic/Other EHR, Claims aggregator, HIE/Regional data, CRM/Physician relationship platform, Data warehouse/BI, Other
    • For the top 5 specialties, what are the current referral retention rates (or best estimate)? Please list specialty and percent.
    • If we asked for a sample dataset to validate patterns, how quickly could you provide a 6–12 month extract? Options: Immediate (days), 2–4 weeks, 1–2 months, Longer than 2 months, Not available

    How Do You Know You’re Winning Today?

    • What single metric do you currently point to when arguing the network is healthy—and why might that be misleading? Options: Referral retention rate, Network adequacy score, Total attributed lives, Cost per attributed patient, Quality indicators (HEDIS/Star)
    • Which of these do you actively track in dashboards right now? (pick all that apply) Options: Referral retention by specialty/ZIP, Network adequacy by ZIP/specialty, Compensation vs. productivity, Attribution & risk pooled lives, Quality & utilization metrics, Provider satisfaction/engagement
    • Tell us the baseline values for the metrics you care about (enter numeric values or ranges): referral retention %, network adequacy score, % compensation at risk, and any quality targets.
    • How confident are you that current metrics truly reflect physician behavior rather than coding, attribution quirks, or temporary shifts? Options: Highly confident, Somewhat confident, Low confidence, Not confident at all
    • Which metric improvement would most likely unlock budget and executive support (pick one)? Options: + Referral retention, Improved network adequacy, Reduced physician cost growth, Demonstrated VBC readiness, Quality performance gains

    What Would ‘Clinical + Financial Alignment’ Actually Feel Like?

    • If physicians felt both clinically respected and financially aligned, what behaviors would you see change in day-to-day practice?
    • Which compensation levers are currently in use or under discussion at your system? Options: Productivity-based RVU model, Quality/incentive bonuses, Capitated/per-member payments, Panel-based productivity, Hybrid models, Other
    • Approximately what percent of total physician compensation is tied to performance or at-risk arrangements today? Options: 0–10%, 11–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, 76–100%, Unknown
    • Describe one recent example where compensation structure created a visible conflict with network goals (free response).
    • How tolerant is your executive team for changes that might temporarily reduce physician pay while improving long-term alignment? Options: Very tolerant, Somewhat tolerant, Low tolerance, Not tolerant / blocked

    Are You Ready for Value-Based Contracts—Really?

    • What is the biggest myth your organization tells itself about being ‘ready’ for value-based contracting?
    • Which value-based capabilities do you currently have in place (pick all that apply)? Options: Risk-bearing entity / ACO, Attribution & claims analytics, Care management programs, Behavioral health integration, SDOH interventions, Provider incentives tied to VBC
    • How clear is patient attribution across your provider network today? Options: Clear and stable, Mostly clear with noise, Often unclear, Not defined
    • Which measures would convince you the network is ready for downside risk (pick up to 2)? Options: Stable attribution, Population health infrastructure, Predictable referral retention, Compensation aligned to risk, Established governance
    • If we needed to close 2–3 capability gaps to take on risk, which are highest priority (rank in your head and describe below)?

    What Will Move the Needle—Practical Tests You’d Try

    • If you had to run a small, low-risk pilot that could prove impact on referrals, which lever would you try first? Options: Targeted physician engagement + retention program, Compensation adjustment pilot, Geographic/specialty recruitment, Referral routing optimization via analytics, Governance change (clinician-led)
    • How large would a credible pilot need to be to persuade decision-makers (choose one)? Options: Single clinic/department, Single specialty across system, Multi-specialty in a region, Systemwide
    • What success criteria would you require to call a pilot successful (pick up to 3)? Options: Improved referral retention %, Reduced leakage to competitors, Net revenue increase, Improved patient access metrics, Physician satisfaction uplift
    • What internal resources could you dedicate to a 3–6 month pilot (FTEs, analytics, governance sponsors)?
    • What would be the fastest way we could demonstrate early wins—data play, incentive tweak, or recruitment fill? Options: Data validation & quick wins, Small compensation tweak, Targeted recruitment, Governance decision enabling referrals

    Governance: Who Declares Success (And How)?

    • Who must sign off on outcome acceptance—finance, physician enterprise, quality, board—and who has veto power?
    • How frequently does your governance body meet and make actionable decisions about network strategy? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Ad hoc only
    • What evidence will your governance group accept as proof of progress (data extracts, dashboard views, patient stories, physician attestations)? Options: Quantitative dashboards, Claims/EMR extracts, Physician/Patient testimonials, Financial reconciliation, All of the above
    • If a metric misses its target, what escalation path do you use and how quickly must it be remedied? Options: Immediate corrective plan (30 days), Review at next governance meeting, Tolerance band with quarterly fixes, No formal path
    • Which stakeholder will own referral retention vs. who will own compensation alignment (name roles)?

    Constraints, Trade-offs, and Cultural Reality

    • What are the non-negotiable constraints (collective bargaining, state regs, legacy contracts, or EMR limits) that could block solutions? Options: Collective bargaining/union rules, State regulatory limits, Existing physician contracts, EMR/data integration limits, None of the above/unknown
    • How much change are your physicians willing to accept on a scale from 1 (none) to 5 (transformative)? Options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • Which trade-off would you accept to protect referral share: higher short-term cost, stricter governance, or reduced physician autonomy? Options: Higher short-term cost, Stricter governance, Reduced physician autonomy, Prefer no trade-off
    • Describe one cultural barrier that has blocked prior alignment efforts and how it presented (free response).
    • Are there political dynamics (departmental rivalries, independent groups) we should map before proposing changes? Options: Yes—multiple, Yes—one or two, No significant politics, Unsure

    Commitment: What Would Make You Say Yes?

    • What level of evidence (timeframe and metric improvement) would lead you to commit to a multi-year engagement? Options: 3 months measurable impact, 6 months clear trajectory, 12 months sustained improvement, Longer than 12 months
    • What budget band would you likely approve to deliver the outcomes you selected earlier? Options: <$250k, $250k–$750k, $750k–$2M, >$2M, Undetermined/depends
    • Which commercial terms reduce your purchase anxiety: pay-for-performance, milestone payments, pilot-first approach, or fixed fee? Options: Pay-for-performance, Milestone payments, Pilot-first, Fixed fee, Hybrid
    • What internal procurement or legal steps typically take the longest and how can we help accelerate them?
    • Realistically, when could your organization be ready to sign an engagement that ties milestones to referral and value-based goals? Options: Immediately, In 1–2 months, In 3–6 months, 6+ months, Unsure
  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through how a targeted network strategy delivers the customer’s outcomes using their referral data, specialties, and governance constraints.

    Experience Meetings

    • Solution Experience Kickoff — Current State Confirmation
    • Data Deep-Dive & Consequence Quantification
    • Targeted Network Strategy Walkthrough (Proof of Future State)
    • Clinical Governance & Operational Constraints Simulation
    • Decision & Mutual Validation — Ready for Solution Scope
    • Define clear acceptance criteria and owners to move governance into deployment.
    • Update referral flow visuals to reflect any corrected mappings and re-run the sensitivity scenarios.
    • Re-state Current State & Consequence (One-sentence)
    • Demonstrate clear, data-backed linkage from strategy modules to the measurable future state.
    • Obtain explicit customer validation that the modeled impacts match their expectations and priorities.
    • Identify which strategy modules should be prioritized in the Solution Scope phase.
    • Seller to deliver the recruitment plan outline showing target specialties, locations, and timeline.
    • Seller to provide a compensation-model prototype with assumptions and expected referral retention impact.
    • Customer to confirm any clinical or regulatory constraints that would affect proposed workflows.
    • Review Governance Constraints & Decision Roles
    • Confirm governance model is operationally feasible and addresses the bottlenecks surfaced earlier.
    • Obtain clinical leader buy-in on the simulated workflows and physician engagement approach.
    • Introductions & Meeting Objectives
    • Draft governance charter including roles, cadence, and escalation paths for customer review.
    • Identify clinical champions and assign owners for physician engagement activities.
    • Update operational workflows to incorporate agreed exception handling and risk controls.
    • Recap: Current State, Consequence, Future State
    • Achieve mutual sign-off that the Solution Experience has proven the future state and urgency to proceed.
    • Agree the exact scope modules to be developed in the Solution Scope phase with acceptance criteria.
    • Assign owners and a timeline for the Solution Scope deliverables and the subsequent Pre-Deployment Readiness meeting.
    • Seller to deliver draft Solution Scope document (modules, acceptance criteria, timeline) within agreed timeframe.
    • Customer to confirm budget holder and resource commitments required to proceed.
    • Schedule Pre-Deployment Readiness meeting and assign leads for data access, governance launch, and recruitment planning.
    • Produce a single-sentence current state that all participants can repeat back.
    • Agree the list of required data extracts, owners, and delivery dates for the analytic deep-dive.
    • Define 2–4 measurable success signals the Solution Experience must prove.
    • Seller to convert discussion into one-sentence current-state summary and circulate within 24 hours.
    • Customer to provide final referral extract, compensation summary, and governance charters (data owner assigned).
    • Agree timeline and owner for the Data Deep-Dive meeting and analytic pre-work.
    • Data Integrity & Scope Check
    • Validate dataset completeness and correctness for scenario modelling.
    • Produce specific, quantified measures of consequence that create urgency (dollars, % referrals lost, access gaps).
    • Agree which assumptions will be tested and the owner for each validation item.
    • Analytics team to deliver a one-page consequences summary (dollars, referral %, top 3 specialty gaps).
    • Customer finance/ops to confirm unit economics and any local payer considerations used in the model.
    • Workflow Simulation: Referral Routing & Exceptions
    • Define Future-State One-liner & Success Signals
    • Referral Flow Map Walkthrough
    • Review Proofs & Modeled Outcomes
    • Crystal Current-State Statement
    • Physician Incentives & Buy-in Simulation
    • Specialty Gap & Capacity Metrics
    • Module-by-Module Proof: Recruitment & Network Design
    • High-level Data Snapshot
    • Decision Points: Scope, Prioritization, & Acceptance Criteria
    • Resource & Commercial Readiness Check
    • Module-by-Module Proof: Compensation & Alignment
    • Financial Consequence Model
    • Risk Controls & Escalation Paths
    • Consequence Framing (Initial)
    • Module-by-Module Proof: Governance & Clinical Pathways
    • Acceptance Criteria for Governance Launch
    • Assumptions & Validation Points
    • Define Success Signals & Pre-work
    • Next Steps, Owners & Timeline
    • Live Scenario: Referral Retention Simulation
    • Validation & Confirm Fit
  4. Solution Scope

    Define scope modules—gap analysis, recruitment plan, governance design, compensation modeling, and analytics deliverables.

    Scope Configuration

    • Deploy referral-retention dashboard
    • Configure provider directory with adequacy flags
    • Implement physician compensation system (base + incentives)
    • Draft standardized employment and affiliation contracts
    • Execute clinically integrated network participation agreements
    • Integrate claims and referral feeds into data warehouse
    • Launch provider attribution and reconciliation engine
    • Onboard physicians into HR, payroll, and EHR systems
    • Deploy EHR care-coordination order sets and referral workflows
    • Install RN care-management teams and operational workflows
    • Implement shared-savings distribution and payment flows
    • Stand up governance committees with operating procedures

    Scope Questions

    Deploy referral-retention dashboard

    • What is the primary objective for the referral-retention dashboard? Options: Track referral retention % over time, Monitor specialty-level leakage, Identify high-risk physicians for attrition, Tie referrals to revenue and VBC performance, Other
    • Which data sources must feed the dashboard? Options: EHR referral logs, Payer claims, Scheduling system, CRM / physician relationship tool, Provider directory, Other
    • What update cadence do you require for dashboard data? Options: Real-time/streaming, Daily, Weekly, Monthly
    • Who are intended users and what role-based access is required? Options: Executive leadership, Physician enterprise leaders, Network operations, Provider liaisons / recruiters, Analytics team
    • Which KPIs must be included out of the box? Options: Referral retention rate, Net referral leakage, New vs returning referral volume, Referrals by origin (physician, clinic, ED), Revenue per referring physician, Custom KPIs
    • If you have existing analytics tools or platforms, list them and note API or export capabilities.

    Configure provider directory with adequacy flags

    • Which adequacy dimensions are required (select all that apply)? Options: Geographic coverage, Appointment availability / wait times, Procedural capacity, Payer acceptance, Language / cultural competency, Rural access
    • What provider metadata do you currently maintain and what must be added?
    • Do you need real-time provider status (e.g., accepting new patients) integrated? Options: Yes, No, Partially / for select specialties
    • Should adequacy flags be surfaced in external patient-facing directories or internal tools only? Options: External public directory, Internal clinical scheduling tools, Both
    • What governance or approval workflow is required for provider directory changes? Options: Manual approval by network ops, Automated rules with periodic review, Hybrid (auto + manual signoff)
    • Are there compliance or payer-specific directory requirements we must enforce? Options: Yes, No

    Implement physician compensation system (base + incentives)

    • Which compensation structures are you planning to support? Options: Base salary only, Base + productivity incentives, Base + quality/value incentives, Fully risk-based / capitation, Mixed models
    • What performance metrics will drive incentives (select all that apply)? Options: RVU / productivity, Referral retention / loyalty, Quality measures (HEDIS, etc.), Cost / utilization targets, Patient satisfaction, Other
    • What frequency and cadence do you require for incentive calculations and payouts? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Bi-annually, Annually
    • Do you have an existing payroll/incentive disbursement system to integrate with? Options: Yes - modern payroll/HRIS, Yes - legacy payroll, No / manual process
    • Are you expecting different compensation models by specialty or employment status? Options: Yes, by specialty, Yes, by employed vs affiliated, No, standardized model
    • Describe any legal, union, or regulatory constraints that affect compensation design.

    Draft standardized employment and affiliation contracts

    • Which contract types are in scope? Options: Employment agreements, Independent contractor / affiliation, Locum / temporary coverage, Sectional / part-time agreements
    • Are there existing templates or legal standards we must align to (attach or list)? Options: Yes, No
    • What key commercial terms should be standardized (select all that apply)? Options: Compensation & incentives, Ancillaries / revenue share, Non-compete / non-solicit, Call coverage expectations, Termination & clawback
    • What approval workflow and stakeholders are required for contract sign-off? Options: Legal, HR/People Ops, Physician leadership, Finance, Executive sponsor
    • Do you require jurisdictional / state-specific language or variations? Options: Yes, No
    • Are you planning bulk standardization or individualized negotiation for legacy physicians? Options: Bulk standardization, Individual negotiation, Hybrid

    Execute clinically integrated network participation agreements

    • Which provider cohorts are targeted for CIN participation? Options: Employed physicians, Independent affiliated physicians, Outpatient clinics, Specialty groups, FQHCs / community partners
    • What participation tiers or pathways should agreements support (e.g., full, affiliate, limited)? Options: Full integration, Affiliate membership, Limited participation for selected programs, Custom tiers
    • Which clinical quality, reporting, or data-sharing expectations must be in the agreement? Options: Claims sharing, Quality metric reporting, Care coordination workflows, EHR data access, Patient attribution
    • Do agreements need to define financial arrangements (shared savings, risk corridors)? Options: Yes, include financials, No, clinical-only
    • What is the expected timeline and sequencing for onboarding CIN participants? Options: <3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, >12 months
    • List any payers or contracts that require specific CIN terms or approvals.

    Integrate claims and referral feeds into data warehouse

    • What claim sources must be ingested (select all that apply)? Options: Medicare FFS, Medicare Advantage, Commercial / BCBS, Medicaid, All-payer claims databases
    • How are referrals currently captured and where do they reside? Options: EHR referral module, Scheduling system, CRM / physician relations tool, Manual logs / spreadsheets, Other
    • What latency requirements do you have for integrated data? Options: Near real-time, Daily batch, Weekly batch, Monthly batch
    • What data security, PHI handling, and compliance controls must the warehouse meet? Options: HIPAA-compliant cloud, On-prem with audited controls, Business associate agreement required
    • Do you have an existing data warehouse or analytics platform to extend? Options: Yes - cloud DWH (Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift), Yes - on-prem, No, build new
    • Are there field-level transformations, matching rules, or identity resolution specs available for claims/referrals?

    Launch provider attribution and reconciliation engine

    • Which attribution methodology do you plan to use (or evaluate)? Options: Visit-based / plurality, Episode-based, Prospective attribution, Hybrid / custom
    • What reconciliation cadence and tolerance thresholds do you require? Options: Monthly with <1% variance, Quarterly with <2% variance, Custom thresholds
    • Which stakeholders must receive attribution reports for validation? Options: Physician groups, PCMH leads, ACO operations, Payer partners
    • Do you need lineage and audit logs for attribution decisions (for disputes)? Options: Yes, No
    • What scale (number of providers, episodes, monthly claims) must the engine handle? Options: <1,000 providers, 1,000-5,000, 5,000-20,000, 20,000+
    • Describe any payer-specific attribution rules or historical reconciliations required.

    Onboard physicians into HR, payroll, and EHR systems

    • Which systems are in scope for onboarding integrations? Options: HRIS (Workday/UKG etc.), Payroll provider, Primary EHR, Credentialing system, Benefits administration
    • What onboarding artifacts must be collected (background checks, privileges, CV, DEA, board certificates)?
    • Do you require single-sign on (SSO) or role provisioning tied to directory services? Options: Yes - SSO & role provisioning, Partial, No
    • What is your expected timeframe to onboard a typical physician into all systems? Options: <2 weeks, 2-6 weeks, 6-12 weeks, >12 weeks
    • Will onboarding include training or change management for clinical workflows (EHR templates, referral processes)? Options: Yes, required, Optional, No
    • List any credentialing or privileging idiosyncrasies (state licenses, hospital-specific requirements).

    Deploy EHR care-coordination order sets and referral workflows

    • Which EHR(s) must receive order sets and workflow configuration? Options: Epic, Cerner, Allscripts, Athenahealth, Other
    • What referral scenarios should be modeled (in-system, external, triage, urgent vs routine)? Options: In-system specialty referrals, External referrals, ED-to-OP follow-up, Care transitions, All of the above
    • Do you require smart order sets (decision support, pre-authorization prompts) or static templates? Options: Smart order sets with CDS, Static templates only, Combination
    • Who will own EHR change approvals and testing (IT, clinical informatics, physician champions)? Options: IT / EHR team, Clinical informatics, Physician champions, All of the above
    • What acceptance criteria will confirm workflows are deployed successfully (e.g., % of referrals using new path)?
    • Are there payers or value-based contracts that require specific order set or referral data capture? Options: Yes, No

    Install RN care-management teams and operational workflows

    • What patient cohorts will RN care-management support (e.g., high-risk, VBC attributed, complex chronic)? Options: High-risk chronic, Attributed VBC populations, Post-acute transitions, All ambulatory patients
    • What FTE model do you plan for RN teams (centralized, embedded, hybrid)? Options: Centralized RN hub, Embedded in clinics, Hybrid model
    • What workflows and tools must RNs use (care plans, telephonic outreach, EHR tasking, analytics dashboards)? Options: EHR tasking & care plans, Telehealth/phone outreach, External care-management platform, Analytics dashboards
    • What caseload targets and KPIs should guide staffing (e.g., 1:100 high-risk)?
    • Will RN teams require credentialing, privileged access, or connectivity to payer portals? Options: Yes, No, Partial
    • Describe required escalation paths and handoffs between RNs, PCPs, and specialists.
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, responsibilities, milestones, and acceptance criteria tied to referral and value-based performance goals.

    Agreement Modules

    • Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Commercial Terms & Payment Schedule
    • Milestones & Acceptance Criteria
    • Roles, Responsibilities & Resource Commitments
    • Data Access & Security Agreement (DPA/Data Use)
    • Governance & Escalation Charter
    • Compensation Alignment & Provider Incentive Plan
    • Performance-based Payment / Value-based Incentive Schedule
    • Change Order & Scope Management
    • Risk Allocation, Liability & Insurance
    • Implementation Timeline & Onboarding Plan
    • Final Sign-off & Closeout Agreement
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm data access, physician engagement plans, governance participants, and risk controls before execution.

      Readiness Questions

      Quick Check: What Outcome Are We Chasing First?

      • In one sentence, what must this deployment achieve in the first 90 days to feel like a win?
      • Which single metric would you use to say 'we launched successfully'? Options: Referral retention rate, Referrals routed to target specialists, Governance meetings launched, Compensation alignment executed, Analytics dashboards live, Other
      • Who will be the primary sponsor on your side who will publicly sign off on that 90-day success metric? Options: Chief Strategy Officer / VP Strategy, President, Physician Enterprise, COO, CIO/CMIO, ACO Executive Director, Other
      • What would make you hesitate to declare success at 90 days even if the metric shows improvement?
      • How confident are you that internal teams will prioritize deployment tasks over day-to-day operational demands? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Not confident, Unsure

      What Would Happen If We Launched Without the Right Data?

      • If critical referral and provider data were incomplete at go-live, what are the two biggest problems you expect to see in weeks 1–8?
      • Which of the following data sources are required for referral routing, performance tracking, and compensation modeling? Options: EHR encounter/referral logs, Practice management/scheduling, Commercial and Medicare claims, Provider roster/credentialing, Compensation & HR data, Third-party referral platforms, Patient attribution files, Other
      • For the sources you selected, which systems currently allow automated export or API access? Options: All selected systems, Some systems (list in next field), None — manual extracts only, Unsure / need to confirm
      • Who currently controls access to those systems (role/title), and what’s the typical lead time to grant a scoped read-only feed?
      • How tolerant are you of partial data at launch (e.g., 60–80% coverage) vs. requiring full coverage before any deployment activities? Options: Accept partial coverage and iterate, Prefer most data (80–95%) before launch, Require full coverage, Undecided

      Who's Actually Going To Make The Hard Calls?

      • If a governance decision forces a trade-off between clinician autonomy and standardization, who will be the ultimate decision-maker? Options: System CEO/COO, Physician Enterprise President, Clinical Council/CMO, Joint governance committee, Other
      • List the people or groups who must be actively involved in weekly governance for the first 3 months (title/role is fine).
      • Which governance model best describes how you want decisions escalated during deployment? Options: Tight central decisioning with exceptions, Shared joint committee with equal votes, Clinical-led with system oversight, Advisory committee; execs approve, Other
      • How quickly can you commit to a recurring governance cadence (e.g., weekly ops, biweekly leadership) once deployment begins? Options: Weekly, Biweekly, Monthly, Ad-hoc as issues arise, Undecided
      • Are there known governance relationships (e.g., competing committees or parallel initiatives) that could block timely approvals? If so, describe.

      Can We See the Data — and Trust It?

      • If dashboards showed a sudden 15% drop in referral retention, how confident would you be that the underlying data is accurate? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Not confident, Would need investigation
      • Which validation checks do you currently run (or want run) before accepting referral or attribution metrics? Options: Record-level reconciliation, Provider roster match, Sample clinical chart review, Claims-to-EHR cross-check, Statistical anomaly detection, Other
      • Who owns the data quality escalation path (title/role) when a metric fails reconciliation? Options: Analytics/BI lead, CMIO, IT/data engineering, Third-party vendor, Other
      • What cadence for data refreshes is needed to support operational workflows (e.g., weekly, daily, real-time)? Options: Real-time / near real-time, Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Other
      • If we find systemic gaps in historical referrals during validation, how would you prefer we handle reporting to stakeholders (pause, annotate, or proceed with caveats)? Options: Pause and remediate, Proceed with annotations and confidence bands, Continue but highlight limitations, Other

      How Anchored Are Your Physicians To This Plan?

      • If you had to guess, what percentage of your employed and affiliated physicians are likely to view this deployment as an opportunity rather than a risk? Options: 0–20%, 21–40%, 41–60%, 61–80%, 81–100%
      • Which physician cohorts are most at risk of disengaging (by specialty, employment status, or geography)? Options: Hospital-employed specialists, Independent affiliates, Primary care employed, Community-based specialists, Rural providers, Other
      • Describe the last time physician sentiment materially affected a rollout. What happened and how was it resolved?
      • Which engagement tactics have historically moved physicians (select all that worked and add notes in the next field)? Options: One-on-one leader meetings, Clinician peer champions, Transparent data-sharing, Financial incentives/comp changes, Operational support (staffing/scheduling), Quick-win pilots
      • What communications and feedback loops should be in place pre-launch to prevent surprises on day one?

      What Blind Spots Could Derail Deployment?

      • What compliance, legal, or payer risks would keep you up at night if not addressed pre-deployment? Options: Anti-kickback/AR issues, Contractual attribution conflicts, Privacy/PHI exposure, Payer contract requirements, Employment/compensation disputes, Other
      • Do you have escalation protocols for adverse events (clinical, financial, reputational)? If not, who should own creating them? Options: Yes, existing protocol, Partial protocol — needs updates, No protocol — need to create, Unsure
      • What contingency budget or resource pool exists to address unexpected physician departures, data remediation, or incentive misalignment? Options: Dedicated contingency budget, Reprioritize existing budgets, No contingency — would escalate, Unsure
      • Are there specific regulatory reporting windows or payer milestones tied to this schedule we must not miss? Options: Yes — list in next field, No, Unsure
      • Who should be included on a rapid-response team if a governance or compliance issue requires a decision within 48 hours?

      Do We Have Defensible Acceptance Criteria and Measurement?

      • If a vendor or partner says 'dashboards live' — what minimum elements must be demonstrably working for you to accept that? Options: Referral routing visualizations, Provider roster match, Baseline referral retention metric, Governance issue tracker, Compensation impact preview, Other
      • What baseline data (time period and metrics) should be used to measure post-launch changes? Options: Rolling 12 months, Most recent 6 months, Pre-defined contract baseline, Custom period (specify)
      • Which stakeholders must sign acceptance and what level of evidence do they expect (anecdote, sample reconciliation, full audit)?
      • How will we operationalize tracking of referral retention and value-based readiness — internal analytics, vendor dashboards, or a hybrid? Options: Internal analytics team, Vendor-managed dashboards, Hybrid (vendor + internal), Third-party auditor
      • What red-lines or thresholds would trigger pause or rollback of deployment (e.g., >X% drop in referrals)? Please specify.

      Who Owns The Tasks, And Are They Resourced?

      • Which functions must be staffed and active at launch (select all that will need owners we can hold accountable)? Options: Provider recruitment, Governance facilitation, Compensation administration, Data engineering/feeds, Analytics & reporting, Communications/physician engagement, Other
      • For each function you selected, can you name the person or role and whether they are fully allocated, part-time, or need to be hired?
      • What external partners (if any) will we rely on during first 90 days and what dependencies do they introduce? Options: Network strategy vendor, Analytics vendor, Compensation consultant, Recruiting firm, None, Other
      • What is the realistic earliest date each core owner can begin dedicated deployment work? Options: Immediately, Within 2 weeks, 2–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, Unsure
      • Where do you anticipate resource pinch points that could delay sequencing (e.g., IT backlog, credentialing delays, legal review)?

      If This Works, Will It Stick?

      • If we meet the 90-day acceptance criteria, what governance or operational changes must be in place to sustain progress long-term?
      • Which success signals should trigger expansion of the program vs. pausing to optimize (select all that apply)? Options: Sustained referral retention improvement, Positive physician engagement metrics, Projected net financial benefit, Quality measure improvements, Operational reliability (data + governance)
      • What ongoing rhythm for measurement and review would you prefer after launch (monthly KPI review, quarterly strategy, annual comp refresh)? Options: Monthly KPI reviews, Quarterly governance deep-dive, Biannual compensation review, Other
      • What would cause you to revert to the previous operating model even after initial success? Options: Leadership change, Negative financial shock, Clinician backlash, Payer contract change, Other
      • What is one small, concrete commitment you can make today that would materially reduce deployment risk (e.g., named data owner, provisional governance slot, contingency fund)?
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule tasks, assign owners for recruitment, governance launch, comp rollout, and analytics integration with clear sequencing.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify acceptance criteria: referral retention tracking, governance meetings initiated, compensation alignment implemented, and analytics dashboards live.

      Validation Questions

      Setting the Table: Who's in the Room?

      • Who from your team will be the primary decision-maker and which leaders must be involved for a network strategy to move forward? Options: Hospital COO, Chief Strategy Officer, VP/Director, Physician Enterprise, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Financial Officer, ACO Executive/Director, Board representative, Clinical Service Line Director, Other
      • What timeline are you operating under for a decision and initial deployment? Options: Immediately / within 30 days, 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months
      • Which outcomes would leadership prioritize in the next 12 months? Options: Referral retention, Reduce physician employment cost, Close specialty/network gaps, Improve value-based readiness, Increase patient access, Improve quality metrics (e.g., HEDIS, readmissions), Other
      • Who outside formal leadership—specific influential physicians, practice managers, or external partners—could block or accelerate adoption, and why?
      • How aligned are your executive and clinical leaders about what 'good' should look like for this effort? Options: Fully aligned, Mostly aligned with some differences, Strongly misaligned, No shared view yet

      If Your Network Could Tell the Truth About Referrals...

      • Roughly how many referrals per month do you estimate are shifting away from your system by specialty, and what would that loss mean financially and strategically?
      • Do you currently track referral retention and leakage in a repeatable way? Options: Yes — by physician and patient, Yes — by specialty only, Ad hoc/manual analyses, No — we do not track reliably
      • Which referral data sources do you reliably access today? Options: EHR referral records, Claims data, Physician self-report / surveys, Patient scheduling/call center logs, Care navigation / CRM tools, None / limited
      • Can you share a recent example where referral movement materially changed a service line, budget, or payer negotiation outcome?
      • What are the most common reasons physicians or patients give for choosing competitors—are these operational, cultural, financial, or access-related? Options: Access/appointment availability, Specialist reputation, Financial incentives/compensation, Patient preference/location, Clinical autonomy for physicians, Other

      What's Costing You Sleep (and Margin)?

      • If physician employment costs continue to rise faster than revenue, which parts of your network do you expect to shrink, fragment, or create operational stress first?
      • How transparent are your current physician compensation models to the physicians affected by them? Options: Fully transparent and documented, Partially transparent, Not transparent, Varies widely across groups
      • Which compensation levers are you willing to adjust to influence referrals and alignment? Options: Productivity-based pay, Panel/population-based incentives, Quality/performance bonuses, Sign-on or retention bonuses, On-call / premium stipends, Not willing to change compensation
      • Tell us about a compensation change you tried—what worked, what backfired, and how did physicians react?
      • How often do you benchmark physician compensation and total employment cost against comparable markets? Options: Quarterly, Annually, Irregularly, Never

      What Assumptions Are Quietly Steering Your Plan?

      • Which 'truths' about your physicians, referrals, or market behavior have never been tested—and what would change if they turned out to be false?
      • Which assumptions do you rely on when forecasting where to recruit or invest in specialty capacity? Options: Recruitment will be fast, Patient demand is stable or growing, Referrals are sticky / loyal, Payer contracts will improve, Competitors will hold steady, Other
      • Where in prior network projects did an unstated assumption create the biggest surprise or setback?
      • How confident are you in your specialty demand forecasts and the data that informs them? Options: High confidence, Moderate confidence, Low confidence, No reliable data
      • What evidence—data points, physician behaviors, or market signals—would make you change a long-standing assumption quickly?

      Picture a Network That Actually Works

      • If you could measure two signals that would prove your network is truly aligned and competitive, which two would you choose and why?
      • Which KPIs matter most for the next 12 months to convince leadership this work is succeeding? Options: Referral retention rate, Network adequacy by specialty and geography, Physician engagement/Net Promoter score, Total physician cost per RVU, Value-based contract performance (shared savings, quality), Patient access/wait times, Utilization/ER diversion metrics
      • What numerical targets or thresholds would make leadership consider this engagement a clear win (please provide numbers where possible)?
      • Who will ultimately judge success—executive leadership, physician governance, payers, board—and how should their criteria be weighted? Options: Executive leadership, Physician governance/committee, Payers, Board, Other
      • If success requires trade-offs (e.g., short-term revenue vs. long-term referral retention), which trade-offs are acceptable and which are deal-breakers?

      The Structural Gaps We Can't Ignore

      • Which governance, data, or operational gap would cause a deployment to stall within the first 90 days if not addressed?
      • Which of these capabilities are fully operational today? Options: Real-time referral dashboards, Governance committee with charter and meeting cadence, Active physician recruitment pipeline, Automated compensation modeling and payroll integration, Claims + EHR data integration, None of the above
      • Describe your current governance model for physician network decisions—who approves recruitment, compensation changes, and referral policies?
      • Do you have a single source of truth for physician attribution and patient panels? Options: Yes — claims-based attribution, Yes — EHR-based panels, Multiple conflicting sources, No single source of truth
      • What practical risks (data privacy, legal/contract limits, political resistance, vendor dependency) keep you awake about implementing change?

      Are You Ready to Measure What Matters?

      • If we delivered dashboards and acceptance criteria next week, what would you still doubt most—our measurements, your data quality, or your team's willingness to act?
      • Which analytics outcomes must be live before you would sign off on a pilot or pilot expansion? Options: Referral retention dashboard, Specialty gap map, Compensation alignment model, Attribution accuracy >90%, Predictive recruitment candidate list, All of the above
      • What reporting cadence and governance meeting rhythm would realistically sustain momentum for you (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly)? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Quarterly
      • How willing is your organization to tie commercial milestones (payments, renewals) to measured referral or value-based performance? Options: Very willing, Somewhat willing, Reluctant, Not willing
      • What's one concrete commitment (data access, named owner, budget line) you could make now to materially reduce deployment risk?

      First Small Moves That Prove Progress

      • What's the smallest change we could implement within 60 days that would demonstrate momentum and build trust with physicians and leaders?
      • Which pilot area would you choose for a rapid test? Options: Single high-leakage specialty, Hospital-owned clinic group, ACO-attributed panel, Geographic market with high competition, Payer-contracted population, Other
      • What specific data access or approvals must be granted to start a 60-day pilot?
      • How will we define pilot success—quantitative thresholds, physician feedback, or a combination? Options: Quantitative thresholds only, Qualitative physician feedback only, Combination of both, Unsure — need help defining
      • Who should be the owner from your side for this pilot and what level of decision authority will they have?
  7. Success

    Review outcomes against success signals, capture learnings, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Outcomes Validation Workshop
    • Success Retrospective & Lessons Learned
    • Enhancement & Issue Triage Forum
    • Operational Governance Check-in (Monthly)
    • Executive Success Review & Renewal Planning

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Refresh dashboard filters and publish weekly exception report to the shared channel.
    • Create a prioritized backlog of improvements with owners and metrics.
    • Agree on a lightweight process to track implementation of lessons learned.
    • Publish a Lessons Learned report with evidence and recommended backlog items.
    • Create the prioritized improvement backlog in the shared channel and tag owners.
    • Schedule focused working sessions for the top 3 improvement items.
    • Open Issues & SLA Review
    • Triage and prioritize open issues and enhancement requests aligned to business impact.
    • Define implementation sequencing and resource requirements for prioritized items.
    • Establish clear governance for the shared channel and escalation paths.
    • Update the enhancement backlog with impact, effort, owner, and target release date.
    • Assign a triage owner responsible for the shared channel and SLA tracking.
    • Publish the shared-channel governance doc and escalation matrix.
    • Dashboard KPI Review
    • Keep performance monitoring active and surface exceptions early.
    • Ensure governance actions are completed and owners are accountable.
    • Identify and triage medium-term risks that require escalation.
    • Pre-work / Data Snapshot Review
    • Assign mitigation owners for the top 3 risks and set re-check dates.
    • Confirm next month's governance meeting schedule and owners for agenda items.
    • Executive One‑Page Outcome Summary
    • Secure an executive decision on renewal, expansion, or formal hand-off.
    • Ensure executives understand strategic and financial consequences of the decision.
    • Agree next steps, owners, and timelines for the chosen option.
    • Deliver an executive summary deck with supporting data and proposed SOW options.
    • If renewing/expanding, circulate draft commercial terms and resource plan for sign-off.
    • If transitioning, create a transfer-of-ownership plan with training dates and acceptance criteria.
    • Verify each success signal with data and agree acceptance status.
    • Surface and agree root causes for any gaps with immediate mitigations.
    • Assign remediation owners, timelines, and measurable acceptance criteria for outstanding items.
    • Produce a signed Acceptance Record listing accepted signals and conditions for any conditional acceptances.
    • Create remediation plans for off-target signals with owners, milestones, and target re-check dates.
    • Publish the validated data extracts and annotated dashboard snapshots to the shared channel.
    • Timeline Recap
    • Document a clear set of learnings that explain why outcomes succeeded or failed.
    • Enhancement Requests Review
    • What Worked (Evidence-Based)
    • Financial & Strategic Consequence
    • Top Exceptions & Root-Cause Flags
    • One‑Sentence Current State
    • Physician Sentiment & Adoption Snapshot
    • Explicit Consequence Summary
    • What Didn't Work (Data + Stories)
    • Impact / ROI Assessment
    • Governance & Meeting Cadence Status
    • Root Cause Patterns
    • Recommended Next‑Phase Options
    • Recruitment & Network Gap Updates
    • Success Signal-by-Signal Review
    • Prioritization & Release Sequencing
    • Gap Root-Cause Triage
    • Commercial & Resourcing Considerations
    • Shared Channel Governance & Escalation
    • Improvement Backlog & Prioritization
    • Compensation Alignment & Exceptions
    • Acceptance Decisions & Criteria
    • Communications & Stakeholder Notifications
    • Risks, Mitigations & Escalations
    • Action Ownering & Measurement
    • Decision & Commitments
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.