Industrial & Manufacturing
›
Oil, Gas & Natural Resources
›
Mining & Minerals
Tailings Management
Capital-intensive extraction and processing programs where safety, regulation, and supply chain complexity define execution.
GHD
Golder Associates (WSP)
SRK Consulting
AECOM
Inside this journey
-
Pre-Discovery
Align decision-makers, regulatory expectations, and constraints before technical discovery.
-
Stakeholder Alignment
Confirm decision roles, regulatory expectations, risk tolerances, and timeline across operations, corporate technical services, and the board.
Alignment Questions
Getting Started: Who’s in the Room?
- Who on your team will be our primary contacts for tailings decisions (select all that apply)?
- Which of those people are final decision-makers versus technical advisors—list names and roles for up to three final decision-makers.
- Who holds budget approval authority for tailings capital and O&M—site, regional, corporate, or board?
- How do you prefer to run stakeholder meetings while a technical review is underway?
- Are there interpersonal or political dynamics among stakeholders we should know about to work effectively?
If Your Board Pushed Back Tomorrow, What Would You Show Them?
- What single piece of evidence or assurance would most convince your board this tailings program is under control?
- Have you experienced board pushback on tailings before? Tell us briefly what happened and what changed as a result.
- How involved is the board in day-to-day technical decisions versus high-level approvals?
- What timeline pressure (e.g., permitting, financing, production ramp) does the board explicitly impose?
Where Compliance Starts to Feel Dangerous
- Which regulatory requirement causes the most concern for your operation right now?
- Have regulators issued findings, directives, or conditional approvals recently? If yes, summarize the key points and deadlines.
- What would be the practical consequences of a regulatory non-compliance event for your site?
- Which deliverables do you feel are most vulnerable in upcoming filings or inspections (e.g., monitoring reports, closure cost estimates, design updates)?
The Risks You’re Quietly Losing Sleep Over
- Which failure scenarios are most worrying to you personally?
- If you rank risks from 'intolerable' to 'acceptable trade-off,' where do catastrophic failure, environmental contamination, and short-term production loss fall?
- When was the last incident or near-miss at your tailings facility? What went wrong and who took action?
- Do you have an internal risk appetite statement or thresholds (e.g., tolerable probability of slope movement per year)? If so, summarize or attach.
Timeline Tension: Urgency, Realism, and Hidden Deadlines
- If forced to choose today, would you prioritize speed to implement mitigation or taking extra time to reduce uncertainty—and what are you willing to trade?
- List any hard external dates that constrain decisions (permit expiries, lender covenants, regulatory inspections, mine plan milestones).
- Are there upcoming inspections, audits, or permitting milestones in the next 3–12 months we should prioritize?
- What internal approval lead time do we need to plan around (e.g., 4-week engineering review, 8-week board cycle)?
How Decisions Actually Get Made Here
- Think of the last major capital decision at your company—what single breakdown most slowed it down or nearly derailed it?
- Which internal committees or sign-offs are mandatory for tailings-related capital or vendor selection?
- Is there a formal gating process with defined deliverables before each approval? If yes, name the gates and primary evidence required.
- Who negotiates commercial/legal terms on your side (site legal, corporate legal, procurement, outside counsel)?
- Which contracting model do you prefer for technical services and construction oversight?
Data, Instrumentation, and Where Confidence Breaks Down
- What data or instrument gaps would immediately undermine your confidence in any proposed solution?
- Which instruments and data streams are currently installed and active at the facility?
- How reliable are your current telemetry and alarm systems (percentage uptime or qualitative rating)?
- Who owns the data and how is access granted to external engineering teams or reviewers?
- Are instrument calibrations, QA records, and chain-of-custody documented and available for review?
Communication and Governance: Keeping Everyone Aligned
- What previous communication breakdowns between technical teams, operations, and executives caused delays or errors?
- What cadence and format of updates would give your team confidence without creating meeting fatigue?
- Who must be copied on critical risk communications (names/roles)?
- What escalation path do you require for threshold breaches or alarm events?
Budget Signals and Commercial Constraints
- Does budget uncertainty have the power to stop an otherwise technically sound solution?
- What range of budget has been contemplated for addressing prioritized tailings risks (select closest)?
- Would you consider a phased or pilot-first commercial approach to accelerate risk reduction while deferring full capital spend?
- Are there internal procurement windows, fiscal year constraints, or preferred supplier lists that would affect timing?
What Would Make This Partnership Easy to Say Yes To?
- What are the top three objections you anticipate from stakeholders when presented with our proposed plan?
- Who are the undecided influencers we need to persuade, and what evidence would convince each of them?
- Would a short, focused pilot or proof-of-value (site characterization + monitoring baseline) help accelerate decisions?
- Assuming the pilot proves value, what is the fastest realistic window you could approve follow-on work?
- What final deliverable or assurance would make you feel safe signing a statement of work (e.g., independent review letter, guaranteed inspection readiness, fixed-price phase)?
-
Current State Mapping
Document facility configuration, tailings characteristics, past inspections, instrumentation gaps, and known failure modes.
Current State
Tell Me Where We're Starting
- Briefly describe the tailings facility we're discussing (name, location, active/closed, approximate capacity, tailings consistency).
- Which of the following best describes ownership and operating structure for this facility?
- Who on your team is most accountable for day-to-day tailings decisions and who signs off on capital investments? (select all that apply)
- Which phase best matches this facility today?
- Do you currently have a documented dam safety review and independent tailings review board (ITRB) engagement in place?
- What immediate outcome are you hoping an external engineering partner delivers in the next 6–12 months? Be specific (e.g., stability assurance, monitoring upgrade, permit deliverable).
If This Fails, Who Pays the Price?
- Imagine a credible tailings integrity incident occurred tomorrow — what would that change about your personal accountability, corporate exposure, and regulator response?
- Which of the following regulatory or stakeholder consequences worry you most after a major incident? (select up to three)
- How confident are you today that your current inspections and monitoring would detect a developing failure early enough to act?
- Have you experienced near-miss events, anomalous readings, or unexpected drainage/deformation in the last 3 years? If yes, please describe one example and how it was handled.
- Which loss scenarios do you consider credible for this facility? (choose all that apply)
- Which data streams (if any) do you trust least right now when assessing risk?
What's Really Keeping You Up at Night?
- Which single failure mode would, if realized, cause the most immediate operational and personal consequences for you?
- How often do inspection findings or monitoring alarms trigger an engineering review today?
- When monitoring or inspection gaps are found, what typically prevents them from being fixed quickly?
- Tell us about a time an instrument or inspection surprised you — what happened, how did it make you feel, and what did you wish had been different?
- To what extent do you feel your leadership (operations, corporate, board) understands the technical uncertainty that remains at the site?
- Which operational trade-offs are you most willing to accept to reduce risk (select up to two)?
Are You Relying on Assumptions That Might Be Wrong?
- What commonly-held assumptions about site geology, tailings behaviour, or hydrology are we still treating as fact without targeted data?
- Which of the following characterization items are currently incomplete or outdated for this site? (select all that apply)
- How long have these information gaps persisted, and what has been the reason for the delay?
- Which instruments or systems do you consider highest priority to replace or validate first (pick up to three)?
- If you could commission one targeted test or data acquisition campaign this quarter, what would it be and why?
If Stability Were Guaranteed, What Would Change?
- If you could lock in one measurable outcome that would eliminate your biggest worry, what would it be (e.g., maximum crest displacement, pore pressure limit, alarm lead time)?
- Which outcome dimensions matter most to you and your stakeholders? (rank or select all that apply)
- What specific acceptance criteria would you need to sign off on a monitoring or design deliverable?
- Over what timetable would success need to be demonstrated to satisfy operations, corporate, and the board?
- Describe the signals or dashboard metrics that would make you feel genuinely relieved and confident about the facility.
- What budget envelope (range) would you consider reasonable for delivering those prioritized outcomes in the near term?
What Would It Really Cost To Do Nothing?
- What hidden liabilities and operational costs do you think build up if characterization, instrumentation, or QA are deferred?
- Which of these cost categories worry you most as deferred risk compounds? (select all that apply)
- Has the company quantified potential financial exposure from a worst credible failure (indemnity, remediation, business interruption)? If yes, summarize the range.
- Which internal or external stakeholders are most likely to push back on funding mitigation measures, and why?
- How has your corporate risk appetite shifted since recent industry failures and new standards like GISTM?
The First Step — Let's Make It Small and Decisive
- If we agreed on one concrete, doable next step within 30 days that would materially reduce uncertainty, what would that be?
- Which engagement model would you prefer for that next step?
- What internal approvals or documentation would we need from you before starting that first step? (select all that apply)
- Who needs to be in the room (names or roles) to approve a short scope and budget for that work?
- Do you have any constraints on sharing historical monitoring data or on-site access we should know about?
- What would success look like for this first step in thirty days? List concrete deliverables or signals.
-
-
Outcome & Risk Prioritization
Define target safety, compliance, monitoring, and closure outcomes and prioritize risks that must be mitigated.
Discovery Questions
Framing Success: What 'Safe' and Satisfied Looks Like
- In one sentence, how would you describe a successful outcome for this tailings facility?
- Which of these outcomes does your leadership prioritize most right now?
- Who are the non-negotiable stakeholders we must convince to call this a success?
- Which timeframe is most critical when you talk about meeting those outcomes?
- What measurable KPIs or evidence would convince you and your board that we’ve achieved those outcomes?
Are We Comfortable With the Risks We Tolerate?
- Which known risk are you most comfortable leaving partially mitigated today—and why is that tolerated?
- Which of these risks currently have documented, actionable mitigation plans?
- How frequently are those mitigation plans stress‑tested or updated with new data?
- How confident are you that current residual risk levels would pass scrutiny from regulators, lenders, or an independent tailings review board?
- Tell us about a recent near-miss or observation that shook your view of what’s acceptable—what happened and what changed?
If One Alarm Failed, Which One Do You Want Back First?
- Which single monitoring signal, if it stopped working, would most likely lead to a major incident at your site?
- Which monitoring systems are deployed and relied upon today at the facility?
- How would you rate the end-to-end reliability of your monitoring pipeline (sensor → communications → alarm → response)?
- What are the top three barriers that prevent you from achieving more reliable, actionable monitoring?
- Describe your current alarm response protocol—who gets notified, how fast, and what immediate actions are expected?
What Would Regulators Demand If They Pressed Harder?
- If a regulator required proof today that this facility meets the GISTM standard of care, what single piece of evidence would be hardest for you to produce?
- Which regulatory deliverables and records do you maintain proactively?
- How often in the last three years have regulators requested additional mitigation, monitoring, or governance changes?
- How ready are you for a regulator-led inspection focused on monitoring, governance, and closure assurance?
- What immediate steps or evidence would give you confidence that you’d pass regulatory scrutiny without additional conditions?
Where Money and Risk Collide: What Would You Spend To Sleep Better?
- What’s the maximum incremental annual O&M or one‑time capex (as a rough % of project or site capex) you would approve to remove a high‑consequence risk?
- Which of these investment options are currently under serious consideration to reduce risk?
- How does your capital allocation process treat multi-decade closure liabilities versus short-term operational needs?
- Have recent industry failures changed your board’s risk tolerance or willingness to invest in mitigation measures?
- Who must ultimately approve the incremental spend required to implement your top safety or compliance mitigation(s)?
Reimagining Closure: What Legacy Do You Want to Leave?
- If full financial and legal accountability for closure arrived tomorrow, what’s the first change you would make to this facility’s plan?
- Which closure outcomes are non‑negotiable for your company’s reputation and obligations?
- How often is the closure plan updated to reflect as‑built conditions and monitoring trends?
- What are the biggest data or governance gaps between your current closure plan and the evidence you’d need to validate it long‑term?
- Who is the accountable owner for closure liabilities and long‑term monitoring at your company today?
If We Had to Prioritize Today, What Would You Ask Us to Do First?
- If regulators, lenders, or your board asked for a prioritized mitigation plan within 30 days, what three priorities would you put at the top?
- From this list, select the three risks you believe pose the highest remaining threat to safe operations at this facility.
- What short‑term (0–12 months) actions would meaningfully reduce your top risks and increase regulator/lender confidence?
- What decision gates, evidence, or milestones would you require to sign off on those short‑term actions?
- How would you prefer we support you in turning prioritized risks into funded actions?
-
Solution Experience
Translate the customer’s context into a shared plan showing how site characterization, alternatives, monitoring, and ITRB support deliver the prioritized outcomes.
Experience Meetings
- Current State & Consequence Alignment
- Outcome & Risk Prioritization Workshop
- Site Characterization Translation & Alternatives Mapping
- Monitoring, Instrumentation & ITRB Proof Session
- Solution Experience Validation & Shared Plan
- Deliver a monitoring specification and alarm matrix mapped to each prioritized risk and acceptance criterion.
- Recap: Current State & Consequence
- Agree a one-sentence future-state that defines the operational improvement and regulatory posture desired.
- Produce a ranked list of priority risks with explicit acceptance criteria for each.
- Identify essential data gaps and assign owners to close them before the alternatives mapping session.
- Publish the future-state sentence and prioritized risk register to the project space.
- Assign owners and deadlines to close each identified data gap (site borings, lab tests, instrument records).
- Prepare the site characterization summary and alternative catalog for the next meeting.
- Pre-work check & data assumptions
- Map each viable alternative to the prioritized outcomes with explicit evidence of how it mitigates top risks.
- Produce a preliminary ranking of alternatives including cost/schedule/permit trade-offs.
- Identify specific characterization tasks required to confirm the leading alternatives.
- Prepare an alternatives comparison matrix that links each design option to outcome metrics and acceptance criteria.
- Scope and schedule targeted field tests or lab work required to close the identified data gaps.
- Provide high-level cost and schedule ranges for the top 2–3 alternatives.
- Recap: Prioritized Risks & Acceptance Criteria
- Demonstrate that the proposed monitoring and instrumentation package can detect the prioritized risks early enough to meet acceptance criteria.
- Align on ITRB responsibilities, review cadence, and the gating events that require external review or escalation.
- Agree the commissioning, calibration, and acceptance tests needed to validate the monitoring system.
- Introductions & Objectives
- Schedule ITRB kickoff and provide proposed terms of reference and review calendar.
- Draft commissioning and acceptance test procedures for instruments and telemetry.
- Executive Recap: Diagnosis -> Consequence -> Future State
- Secure explicit customer validation or conditional sign-off on the shared Solution Experience plan.
- Confirm a clear path and timeline to progress into Solution Scope with assigned owners and decision dates.
- Document remaining open issues, required regulatory filings, and commercial preconditions to be resolved before mutual commitment.
- Publish the validated Solution Experience packet (plan, evidence, risk register) and circulate to all stakeholders for formal sign-off.
- Owner: Create a workback schedule with milestones, owners, and decision gates for Solution Scope and Mutual Commit.
- List and assign resolution owners for any conditional sign-off items or regulatory prerequisites.
- Produce a single, agreed one-sentence current-state statement that all participants validate.
- Document explicit, quantified consequences (safety, regulatory exposure, cost, schedule) for priority failure modes.
- Align on stakeholders, decision roles, and required pre-work for subsequent meetings.
- Capture and publish the agreed one-sentence current state and consequence statement to the shared workspace.
- Requester: Gather any missing discovery artifacts (recent inspections, instrument logs, design drawings) within 5 business days.
- Schedule Outcome & Risk Prioritization Workshop with required decision-makers.
- Pre-work verification
- Define Target Outcomes (Future State)
- Shared Plan Presentation
- Monitoring Strategy Overview
- Site Characterization Highlights
- Instrumentation Package & Installation Plan
- Proof Points & Open Risks
- Risk Identification
- Alternative Options: Overview
- One-sentence Current State (Diagnosis)
- Validation Exercise (Forced Confirmation)
- ITRB Role & Governance Mapping
- Consequence Quantification
- Risk Prioritization & Acceptance Criteria
- Proof Mapping: Alternative -> Outcome
- Stakeholder & Decision Role Confirmation
- Commercial & Regulatory Preconditions
- Decision: Top Risks & Outcome Metrics
- Trade-offs: Cost, Schedule, Permitting, Operational Disruption
- Proof: Simulated Event -> Detection -> Escalation
- Scope & Success Criteria for Solution Experience
- Preliminary Ranking & Data Gaps
- Validation Workshop: Tiebacks to Customer Problems
- Confirm Data & Analysis Needs
- Sign-off & Next Steps
-
Solution Scope
Define deliverables, design modules, instrumentation package, acceptance criteria, and responsibilities from feasibility through post-closure monitoring.
Scope Configuration
- Install geotechnical instrumentation package (piezometers, inclinometers, settlement plates)
- Commission automated telemetry and real-time data platform
- Full-time construction quality assurance observation and materials testing
- Perform laboratory tailings and soil testing (grain size, Atterberg, moisture)
- Construct seepage collection drains and toe drainage system
- Install seepage collection sumps and pumpback systems
- Construct filtered tailings dry-stack placement and stacking supervision
- Mobilize and commission filter press and dewatering units
- Deploy drone topographic and beach-profile surveys with deliverables
- Construct buttress and slope reinforcement (rockfill, anchors, berms)
- Execute closure earthworks and cover placement with revegetation
- Install erosion-control measures (riprap, geotextile, diversion channels)
Scope Questions
Install geotechnical instrumentation package (piezometers, inclinometers, settlement plates)
- Is a geotechnical instrumentation package required for this project phase?
- Primary monitoring objectives for instrumentation (select all that apply)
- Expected number of instrument locations (approximate)
- Preferred installation environment or constraints (e.g., difficult access, high water table, seismic zone)
- Desired reporting cadence and alerting (e.g., real-time alarms, daily summary, monthly reports)
- Who is responsible for procurement, installation, and long-term maintenance?
Commission automated telemetry and real-time data platform
- Do you require a cloud-based/hosted platform or on-premises data server?
- Which data types must be ingested (select all that apply)?
- What telemetry method is preferred or available at site?
- Required features: visualization, alarms, user roles, API access (select all required)
- What is the target SLA for data availability and incident response?
- Any regulatory or corporate data retention/compliance requirements (e.g., retention period, encryption, audit logs)?
Full-time construction quality assurance observation and materials testing
- Is full-time CQA required for the entire construction period or targeted phases?
- Which CQA activities are needed (select all that apply)?
- Expected peak construction workforce and number of concurrent work fronts (helps size CQA team)
- Required frequency and format of CQA reporting (e.g., daily logs, weekly summary, non-conformance reports)
- Do you require on-site materials testing laboratory capability or mobile lab support?
- Who signs off on CQA acceptance criteria and non-conformance disposition?
Perform laboratory tailings and soil testing (grain size, Atterberg, moisture)
- Which laboratory tests are required (select all that apply)?
- Approximate number of samples to be tested and sampling plan (e.g., depth intervals, locations)
- Do samples require specialized testing (e.g., acid drainage, organic content, mineralogy)?
- Turnaround time expectation for critical lab results (e.g., preliminary vs. final)
- Do you require chain-of-custody documentation and certified lab reporting for regulatory submissions?
- Who will manage sample collection and delivery to the lab (owner, contractor, engineering team)?
Construct seepage collection drains and toe drainage system
- Is a new seepage collection or toe drainage system required or is this an upgrade to existing works?
- Design drivers for the system (select all that apply)
- Approximate length / area to be served by the drainage system (or provide map/coordinates)
- Preferred construction materials and constraints (e.g., perforated pipe, geotextile, rockfill)
- Is pumpback/storage for collected seepage required and what discharge/quality limits apply?
- Who will be responsible for operation and maintenance of drainage system post-construction?
Install seepage collection sumps and pumpback systems
- Is active pumpback required or are passive sumps sufficient?
- Required design capacity or expected seepage rates (m3/day) if known
- Power availability and preferred power source for pumps (select all that apply)
- Required water quality standards for pumpback discharge or reuse (e.g., plant feed, evaporation pond)
- Preferred level of automation and remote control for pumpback (e.g., PLC control, telemetry alarms)
- Who will own and operate pumps after commissioning (owner, contractor, joint)?
Construct filtered tailings dry-stack placement and stacking supervision
- Is a full dry-stack transition planned or a pilot/partial conversion?
- Required placement tolerances, lift heights, and compaction standards
- What level of stacking supervision is needed (select one)?
- Material handling and transport constraints (e.g., conveyors, trucks, limited access)
- Are dust control, worker safety, and compaction QA defined in acceptance criteria?
- Who will provide on-site equipment and labor for stacking (owner fleet, contractor, third-party)?
Mobilize and commission filter press and dewatering units
- Is procurement of filter press equipment included or is equipment already procured?
- Target throughput (dry tonnes/day or m3/hr) and expected feed characteristics
- Required dewatering performance metrics (e.g., cake moisture %, filtrate quality)
- Power, chemical dosing, and site utilities available for commissioning?
- Do you require operator training, O&M manuals, and spare parts inventory as part of commissioning?
- Who will be responsible for ongoing maintenance and performance monitoring after handover?
Deploy drone topographic and beach-profile surveys with deliverables
- What frequency of drone surveys is required (baseline, monthly, quarterly)?
- Deliverables required (select all that apply)
- Area and approximate flight time per survey (hectares or km2)
- Any access, airspace, or regulatory constraints for drone operations at site?
- Do you require integration of drone deliverables with telemetry/data platform?
- Who will review and accept survey deliverables (owner, engineering team, regulator)?
Construct buttress and slope reinforcement (rockfill, anchors, berms)
- Is this a design & construct engagement or construct-only to provided designs?
- Primary reinforcement method preferred (select all that apply)
- Approximate volumes / dimensions of buttress or reinforcement works (or provide drawings)
- Required performance criteria and acceptance testing (e.g., bearing capacity, anchor load tests)
- Site constraints affecting construction (supply of rockfill, access roads, environmental restrictions)
- Who manages material sourcing and logistics (owner, contractor, joint)?
-
Mutual Commit
Finalize commercial and legal terms, governance cadence, regulatory deliverables, and decision gates tied to design and construction milestones.
Agreement Modules
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Commercial Terms & Pricing Schedule
- Payment Milestones & Retainage
- Change Order & Variation Procedure
- Governance & Decision Gate Schedule
- Regulatory Deliverables & Permit Commitments
- Independent Tailings Review Board (ITRB) Engagement
- Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) & Acceptance Agreement
- Instrumentation & Data Sharing Agreement
- Performance Guarantees & Acceptance Criteria
- Insurance, Liability & Indemnity Schedule
- Regulatory Notification & Incident Response Plan
- Termination, Dispute Resolution & Suspension
- Warranties, Maintenance Period & Retention Release
- Data Privacy & Data Processing Agreement (DPA)
- Third-Party Procurement & Subcontracting Approval
- Acceptance Sign-off Checklist (Handover)
-
Deployment
Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Confirm site access, data feeds, instrumentation procurement, construction QA resources, and regulatory notifications are ready for execution.
Readiness Questions
Quick Check — Why Now, and Who's Nervous?
- Briefly describe why you’re preparing for deployment at this moment — what triggered this readiness effort?
- Which of these best describes the primary driver for deployment now?
- Who are the core decision-makers we should expect to engage during deployment planning (select all that apply)?
- How urgently do you need the deployment to begin?
- What keeps you up at night about starting the deployment (short bullet list of top 3 worries)?
What if “Site Access” Is the Thing Nobody Talked About?
- If a regulator or external reviewer showed up unannounced tomorrow, what would they find most likely to block site access or work?
- Which access constraints are currently active or likely (select all that apply)?
- Who owns securing site access and permits on your side, and how do they prefer to be engaged?
- Are there community or stakeholder expectations that could delay physical works if not proactively managed? Tell us who and why.
- How confident are you that logistics (roads, staging areas, secure laydown zones) are ready to accept construction and instrumentation teams?
Data Should Drive Decisions — Not Dusty Spreadsheets. Are Yours Ready?
- If your monitoring data stopped flowing for 48 hours during commissioning, how would that impact your ability to approve operational handover?
- List the types of instruments you plan to have online at deployment (e.g., piezometers, inclinometers, flow meters, weather stations).
- Which telemetry and data platforms are currently in use or planned for the site?
- Who will own day-to-day data validation, alarm management, and first-line review once systems are commissioned?
- Have your alarm thresholds and escalation pathways been defined and pre-approved for commissioning? If not, what’s missing?
Who Will Actually Build Quality Into This — and Do They Exist?
- If construction QA is under-resourced, which single consequence worries you most?
- Which QA roles are already assigned for deployment (select all that apply)?
- Describe the planned QA handover process from construction to operations — who signs off, what records are kept, and where are they stored?
- Do your procurement contracts include clearly defined installation quality standards and acceptance criteria for instrumentation and civil works?
- How would you rate the current skill level of available field engineers and installers for the specific instruments we’ll deploy?
Procurement: Long Leads That Can Quietly Derail a Project
- Which long-lead or specialty items are critical to your schedule and currently outstanding?
- Have purchase orders been issued for these items, and what is their estimated ship/arrival date?
- Are there import, customs, or local vendor qualification risks that could extend lead times? If yes, explain which and why.
- What contingency procurement options do you have (local substitution, rental units, expedited shipping)?
- How would a 6–8 week delay on a critical instrument affect your project milestones and regulatory commitments?
Commissioning: When 'Working' Becomes 'Trusted'
- What would have to be proven during commissioning for you to accept the system as operationally ready?
- Which of the following acceptance criteria are already written and agreed for handover?
- Who signs the final acceptance certificate — and do they have the authority to stop handover if issues remain?
- How will calibration and validation be documented and retained for regulatory review?
- If commissioning uncovers unacceptable instrument performance, what is your preferred remediation path?
If Things Go Wrong, Who Picks Up the Phone at 2 AM?
- Where are escalation and emergency contact protocols documented, and who is the single point of contact for each shift?
- Which governance cadence do you prefer during the first 90 days after handover?
- Who will be responsible for regulatory notifications in the event of a threshold breach during commissioning or early operation?
- Describe the documentation and sign-off trail you expect for any non-conformance discovered during the first year of operation.
- How comfortable are you with a shared incident channel (real-time chat + log) between your site, our field team, and the engineering owners?
Green Light Conditions — What Would Make You Say Yes Today?
- If you could pick three non-negotiable conditions that must be satisfied before deployment, what would they be?
- Which of the following would most accelerate your approval to proceed?
- What are acceptable trade-offs if we can’t meet every condition before your target start date (e.g., phased deployment, temporary monitoring substitutes)?
- Who needs to be present at the kickoff meeting to feel confident about execution (names/roles)?
- Finally, what's the best way and time to reach the deployment decision-makers for rapid approvals?
-
Deployment Enablement
Schedule and coordinate construction QA, instrumentation installation, monitoring system commissioning, and assigned field and engineering owners.
-
Validation Checklist
Verify instrument calibration, alarm thresholds, QA records, and acceptance criteria for operational handover and regulatory sign-off.
Validation Questions
Quick Orientation — Who's in the Room?
- Tell us your role, the facility name or identifier, and the single site we're focusing on in this conversation.
- Which of these best describes the tailings storage type at this site?
- What commodity and primary tailings material(s) are we dealing with (e.g., copper sand, silica-rich, clay-dominant)?
- Which country(ies) / regulator(s) have jurisdiction over the facility?
- Which internal groups will be the primary decision-makers or technical approvers for this work?
- What is your target window for a decision on next-phase work (feasibility/design/contracting)?
If a Warning Went Silent, What Then?
- Imagine your highest-priority monitoring alarm triggers and receives no action for 72 hours — what would the site look like on day four?
- Have you had unresolved alarms, data gaps, or delayed responses in the last 24 months?
- If 'yes' to unresolved events, describe a specific incident, the root cause, and the operational impact.
- How often do you perform formal dam safety inspections, and do you use a separate independent review board?
- Who on your team feels the personal liability or career risk most acutely if the facility were called into question?
- How does current regulatory scrutiny influence day-to-day operational decisions at the site?
Which Assumptions Are Doing Most of the Heavy Lifting?
- Which single model, dataset, or institutional memory are you most relying on to justify safety and design decisions—and how comfortable are you that it’s accurate?
- List the top three data sources (e.g., boreholes, piezometer network, lab tests) and the date each was last updated.
- Where are the largest characterization or instrumentation gaps today?
- How often are key instruments (piezometers, inclinometers, flow meters) calibrated or validated against independent checks?
- When was the last independent tailings review board (ITRB) or external dam safety expert formally engaged to review your data and conclusions?
- If you had to pick one data gap that worries you most, what is it and why?
What Would 'Safe & Compliant' Actually Feel Like Here?
- If a regulator showed up tomorrow with a checklist, which items would you most worry about failing and why?
- Name the top three 'success signals' that would convince you and the board that operations are safe and closure liability is controlled.
- Do you currently have documented acceptance criteria for operational handover and regulatory sign-off?
- Which monitoring metrics matter most to your regulators and executives (pick all that apply)?
- What reporting cadence and format would most reduce your regulatory friction (e.g., real-time dashboard + quarterly narrative)?
- If everything were perfect on site, what would you stop worrying about first?
The Trade-offs We're Avoiding
- If you had a mandate to reduce closure liability even if it raised capital costs by 25% next year, what would you choose—and who internally would push back?
- Which of these are your top three priorities right now?
- Have you compared the operational disruption, timeline, and lifecycle cost between maintaining the current system and moving to filtered / dry-stack or paste options?
- What governance, cultural, or commercial constraints typically stop the team from taking a more conservative design or monitoring approach?
- How flexible is your capital approval window for safety or monitoring upgrades?
- If we could demonstrably reduce false alarms and investigation time by 50%, what operational benefits would you expect and who would champion that change?
Evidence That Lets Everyone Sleep at Night
- What is the single weakest link in your evidence chain that would most undermine an independent sign-off or regulatory acceptance?
- Which QA/QC documents and records are complete and immediately accessible?
- How are your alarm thresholds currently set, documented, and approved—technical rule, committee, or vendor default?
- Describe your monitoring data governance: platform owner, retention policy, alert routing, and access for reviewers.
- How frequently are calibration checks run, and what tolerance triggers recalibration or instrument replacement?
- If we propose an ITRB engagement, which scopes would you expect them to cover (select all that apply)?
- What would you need from us to assemble a regulatory-ready handover package (documents, evidence, timelines)?
How Do We Reach a Decision, Fast?
- If the board or regulator asked for a clear plan within 60 days, what key pieces would be missing from your response?
- Which groups must formally approve the next-phase engagement (select all that apply)?
- What procurement route will you use to engage engineering and monitoring services?
- What budget has already been allocated or provisionally approved for the next phase?
- What is your ideal timeline to reach agreement on scope, contract, and governance so work can start?
- What would make you say 'yes' to a phased engagement or pilot (deliverables, timebox, risk cap)?
- How do you prefer to receive progress updates and who should be on the recurring governance calls?
-
-
Success
Review outcomes against success signals, maintain regulatory and inspection cadence, and keep a shared channel for issues and enhancements.
Success Reviews
- Quarterly Success Review
- Regulatory & Inspection Cadence
- Operational Monitoring & Alarm Review
- Issues & Enhancements Triage
- Annual Closure & Long-term Liability Review
Issues & Enhancements
- Document the agreed long-term governance charter and schedule the first stewardship review.
- Schedule and confirm field calibration visits for identified sensors within agreed SLA.
- Implement agreed alarm threshold changes in a staging environment and run a 14-day validation.
- Create a data reconciliation task to fill or flag critical gaps affecting KPI calculations.
- Update the monitoring SOP to reflect agreed response times and testing protocols.
- Prioritize incidents and enhancements that materially affect success signals.
- Assign clear owners and SLAs to each prioritized item.
- Incident Triage & Status
- Ensure the shared issue channel has agreed rules for escalation and status updates.
- Publish the prioritized backlog with owners and SLAs to the shared channel within 24 hours.
- Initiate corrective action for any incident rated high risk and report progress weekly.
- Create a plan for the next enhancement sprint and identify required resources.
- Update channel governance document to clarify notification cadence and required evidence for closure.
- Closure Plan Status & Cost Update
- Update and approve the revised closure cost estimate and associated assumptions.
- Agree a post-closure monitoring strategy that meets regulator expectations and preserves success signals.
- Select and authorize a financial assurance approach to underwrite long-term liabilities.
- Establish governance and communication cadence for post-closure stewardship.
- Produce an updated closure cost model with scenario sensitivity and submit to finance/regulators.
- Define the post-closure monitoring package (sensors, frequency, data ownership) and procurement plan.
- Prepare recommended financial assurance instruments and legal language for approval.
- Welcome & Objectives
- Confirm whether the program is meeting agreed success signals and where it is not.
- Authorize any required escalations, additional resources, or mitigation measures for top risks.
- Align executive messaging for regulators and the board if any non-conformances exist.
- Identify 3 prioritized improvement actions for the next quarter with owners.
- Deliver updated consolidated performance dashboard and executive summary within 5 business days.
- Assign owners and deadlines for each approved escalation or mitigation.
- Prepare regulator and board briefing package if required.
- Schedule follow-up technical validation where KPI variance is unresolved.
- Regulatory Calendar Review
- Confirm owners and timeline for all upcoming regulatory deliverables and inspections.
- Close readiness gaps for imminent inspections and identify required evidence or site actions.
- Agree escalation paths and pre-approved messaging for regulator engagement.
- Produce a prioritized inspection readiness checklist and assign owners within 3 business days.
- Deliver regulator submission tracker with expected approval dates.
- Trigger required regulatory notifications and confirm receipt where mandated.
- Update the compliance calendar and push calendar invites to relevant stakeholders.
- Data Availability & Integrity
- Ensure instrumentation and data meet defined SLAs for availability and accuracy.
- Validate alarm performance and decide on threshold or procedure changes to reduce false positives.
- Agree short-term calibration and replacement actions to restore any degraded sensors.
- Enhancement Backlog Review
- Instrumentation Health & Calibration
- Inspection Readiness Assessment
- Post-Closure Monitoring Strategy
- Success Signal Dashboard
- Regulatory Submission Status
- Regulatory & Inspection Highlights
- Alarm Event Review
- Prioritization Exercise
- Regulatory Requirements & Long-Term Obligations
- Risk Transfer & Financial Assurance Options
- Responsibilities & Notifications
- Threshold Tuning & False Alarm Reduction
- Incident & Near-Miss Recap
- Owner Assignment & SLAs
- Validation Trials & Field Verification
- Communication & Channel Rules
- Governance & Stewardship Decisions