Professional Services Architecture & Engineering Firms Construction Management

Integrated Project Delivery

Project-based professional services where design authority, owner approval, and multi-discipline coordination determine delivery.

DPR Construction Swinerton McCarthy Boldt
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, timeline, and each stakeholder’s success criteria and concerns (e.g., CFO risk tolerance).

      Alignment Questions

      Start Here: Your Project in One Sentence

      • In one sentence, describe the project that brought you to consider a new delivery approach.
      • What type of facility is this (select the closest)? Options: Academic building / lab, Hospital / clinical space, Outpatient clinic, Central utilities / infrastructure, Mixed-use campus, Other
      • What is the rough scale and budget range of the project? Options: Under $5M, $5M–$25M, $25M–$75M, $75M–$200M, Over $200M, Undisclosed/Confidential
      • What phase are you currently in? Options: Pre-programming / business case, Schematic design, Design development, Permit / procurement, Construction, Post-construction
      • Who is the primary decision-owner for the delivery model (title/role)?
      • Rough timeline: when would you need construction to start? Options: Within 3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, Undetermined

      Have You Quietly Accepted 'That’s How Projects Go'?

      • If you had to pick one blunt truth: what do you believe the last delivery team got fundamentally wrong?
      • How often have cost overruns, change orders, or adversarial disputes meaningfully delayed or degraded a project for you? Options: Almost every project, Most projects, Some projects, Rarely, Never
      • When that happened, who tended to drive the blame—and what behavior from them felt worst? Options: Architect reverted to scope defense, GC pointed to design errors, Owner changed priorities mid-stream, Trade partners pushed back on schedule, Multiple parties (mixed), Other
      • Tell the story of one past project failure that still stings—what exactly went wrong and why did it stick with you?
      • How has living with those repeated failures affected your team’s appetite for risk and experimentation? Options: We’re very risk-averse now, Cautiously open to change, Eager to try new methods, Unsure / mixed views

      If the CFO Could Only Believe One Thing, What Would It Be?

      • What is your CFO’s single biggest skepticism about shared-risk models like IPD? Options: Shared risk means hidden liabilities, Savings won’t be real or auditable, Parties will revert to blame under pressure, Insurance and disputes will be messy, Other
      • What evidence would genuinely convince your CFO that IPD reduces net cost and not just redistributes risk? Options: Audited final costs from prior projects, Third-party case studies, Commitment to audit rights in contract, Pilot program results, Executive interviews with past owners, Other
      • How does your finance team currently evaluate final project costs—what documents, timelines, or audits do they require?
      • How has the CFO historically responded when a project approaches budget overrun—what decisions or pressures occur? Options: Change scope to save cost, Delay or pause project, Push for dispute resolution, Seek additional funding, Accept overrun reluctantly
      • Who in your leadership needs to be convinced besides the CFO, and what will convince them?

      Where Collaboration Actually Broke — Tell Me the Story

      • What moments or decisions in past projects revealed that teams weren’t truly collaborating? Options: Late design changes without GC input, Trade partners excluded from sequencing, Design and budget mismatch, Change orders that shifted blame, Contractual silos enforced adversarial behavior, Other
      • Who typically withheld information or choices when things got hard, and why do you think they did?
      • Have procurement rules or contract templates constrained collaboration? If so, which clauses or practices became barriers? Options: Low-bid mandates, Strict single-prime contracts, Rigid change order processes, Limited audit or transparency clauses, Union/prevailing wage constraints, Other
      • What governance preference or owner control habit originally drove your interest in IPD? Options: Desire to limit change orders, Need for shared accountability, Improve schedule reliability, Cultural alignment between A/E and GC, Reduce legal disputes, Other
      • When adversarial behavior surfaced, what practical impacts did you see on schedule, cost, or patient/staff disruption? Options: Major schedule slippage, Material cost increase, Reduced quality or rework, Program compromises, Operational disruption, Other
      • What immediate signs would tell you a proposed team is still likely to revert to adversarial habits? Options: Evasive answers about past projects, Lack of lean/TVP examples, No co-location plan, Resistance to audit rights, Blaming previous owners, Other

      What Would Success Actually Feel Like for You (and Your CFO)?

      • If this project finished and your CFO smiled, what measurable outcomes were achieved? Options: Delivered under target cost, On or ahead of schedule, No major claims/disputes, Quality met or exceeded benchmarks, Documented shared savings paid out, Other
      • What are your hard targets for cost, schedule, and quality (please specify metrics or ranges)?
      • What early signals during design or preconstruction would make you confident you’re on track? Options: Transparent cost model updates, Meaningful trade partner engagement, Audit trail for decisions, Consensus on scope reductions, Demonstrated lean practices, Other
      • How will you operationally validate final costs—who signs off and what documentation do you require? Options: Independent audit report, Certified cost accounting, Contractual audit rights, Executive sign-off, Third-party verification, Other
      • Who on your internal team will be directly involved in TVD sessions and pull planning (roles/names)?
      • If we saved X% off baseline target cost, how would you want the savings recognized or reinvested? Options: Return to owner budget, Reinvest in scope upgrades, Increase contingency, Pass through to stakeholder incentives, Other

      What Would Make a Shared-Savings Model Believable?

      • What is your threshold for a meaningful shared-savings pool that would actually change behavior? Options: < 2% of project cost, 2%–5%, 5%–10%, > 10%, Unsure / need guidance
      • What contract features or protections would you need to see to trust that the pool is fairly distributed and auditable? Options: Clear audit rights, Third-party adjudicator, Transparent cost ledger, Pre-agreed allocation formula, Insurance/supporting warranties, Other
      • Have you reviewed audited final costs from completed IPD projects before? If yes, what raised confidence or skepticism? Options: Yes—raised confidence, Yes—felt skeptical, No, haven’t reviewed, Saw summaries only
      • How fluent is your organization with lean construction concepts like pull planning, takt, and TVD? Options: High fluency, Some familiarity, Minimal familiarity, We need training
      • What audit documentation would your finance or legal teams insist on seeing during and after construction? Options: Detailed cost ledger, Trade partner contracts, Time-stamped change logs, Independent cost verification, Insurance certificates, Other
      • What trade-offs would you accept to secure stronger collaboration (e.g., less prescriptive design, more shared governance)? Options: More owner involvement in daily governance, Flexibility on some scope details, Longer design co-location, Willing to pilot in phased approach, Other

      Ready to Try a New Way? Practical Next Steps

      • What would make you say “yes” to a short pilot for IPD on this project? Options: Clear audit and reporting, Defined pilot scope, Limited financial exposure, Executive sponsorship, Demonstrated team capability, Other
      • What specific commitments must your organization make for pre-deployment readiness (co-location, data access, decision authority)?
      • What procurement or board approval steps could delay committing to a multi-party agreement, and how long do they typically take? Options: Formal RFP cycle, Board capital approval, Legal review, Union approvals, Insurance underwriting, Other
      • What internal stakeholders need to be in the next conversation, and what would you like each to hear or see?
      • If we proposed a short, evidence-focused first deliverable (e.g., audited comparable, TVD demo), which of these would be most persuasive? Options: Audited comparable project report, Live TVD workshop with trade partners, Detailed target cost model sample, Executive interviews with prior owners, Independent risk assessment
      • How soon could your team commit people and data to start a TVD kickoff? Options: Immediately (within 2 weeks), Within 1 month, 1–3 months, 3+ months, Unsure
      • What’s the best way for us to follow up—email, scheduled working session, or an executive briefing—and who should be on that invite? Options: Email summary + attachments, Schedule workshop (90–120 min), Executive briefing (30 min), Site visit / peer reference call, Other
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document prior project failure modes, procurement constraints, and the owner’s governance preferences that drove interest in IPD.

      Current State

      A Quick Project Snapshot

      • What is the project name, location, and approximate construction budget?
      • Which phase is the project currently in? Options: Pre-programming / concept, Schematic design, Design development, Construction documents, Permitting, Post-design / pre-construction
      • What is driving this project right now—compliance, capacity, modernization, technology, other? Options: Regulatory/compliance, Capacity/expansion, Modernization/renovation, Technology/medical fit-out, Life-safety, Other
      • Who needs to sign off for go/no-go on the delivery model (names/titles)?
      • How soon does the owner need a contracting decision on delivery model? Options: Immediately (weeks), In 1–3 months, In 3–6 months, Longer than 6 months, Undecided

      Which Past Project Failure Haunts You Most?

      • Tell us about a prior project that left leadership skeptical—what happened, in your own words?
      • Which of the following factors best explain those failures? Options: Scope creep / change orders, Adversarial contracts / finger-pointing, Late constructability input, Poor trade coordination, Inadequate early cost control, Procurement-driven lowest-bid selection, Other
      • What were the most tangible consequences (pick all that apply)? Options: Budget overrun, Schedule delay, Quality failures / rework, Litigation / claims, Loss of trust with stakeholders, Operational disruption post-handover
      • When did you first see warning signs on that project—and what did they look like?
      • How often have projects in your portfolio shown the same pattern? Options: Almost always, Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely

      What Procurement Rules Are Telling You 'No' Before We Start

      • What procurement or policy constraints feel like the biggest obstacles to pursuing IPD here?
      • Which procurement approach does your institution default to for projects of this size? Options: Design-bid-build (lowest responsive bidder), Design-build, Construction manager at-risk (CMAR), Multi-party / IPD (rare), Qualification-based selection
      • Are there statutory or board-mandated rules (e.g., public procurement thresholds, diversity mandates, union agreements) that will affect contracting options? Options: Yes — procurement thresholds, Yes — public bidding statutes, Yes — union / labor agreements, Yes — diversity/supplier mandates, No / not applicable, Unsure
      • How much flexibility does your procurement/legal team typically allow for innovative contracting (e.g., multi-party agreements, target cost mechanisms)? Options: High flexibility, Some flexibility with approvals, Very limited, None
      • What approvals (committees, legal opinions, finance sign-offs) would an IPD agreement need to pass? Please list names/titles and timing.

      Who Really Makes the Calls — and How Do They Like to Decide?

      • Who in your organization ultimately prioritizes trade-offs between cost, schedule, and quality—and how do they typically decide under pressure?
      • Which of these best describes your governance style for capital projects? Options: Top-down, finance-led control, Collaborative steering committee, Project team empowered to decide, Hybrid — dependent on project risk
      • Which stakeholders beyond the CFO and VP of Capital Projects will need to feel heard for IPD to move forward? Options: General counsel, Procurement/Purchasing, Clinical leadership, Facilities operations, Board members/trustees, External funders, Other
      • How does your leadership react when trade-offs are proposed that save cost but require shared governance or less direct owner control? Options: Supportive, Cautious but open, Resistant, Depends on magnitude
      • Describe a recent decision where governance style helped—or hurt—project outcomes.

      If the CFO Could Ask One Question Before Saying Yes, What Would It Be?

      • What are the CFO’s top three concerns about shared-risk/shared-reward models? Options: Unclear auditability of final costs, Exposure to downside risk, Lack of fiduciary control, Insufficient contingency, Unknown legal precedent, Difficulty proving savings
      • What specific evidence or documentation would make the CFO comfortable (examples: audited final cost reports, references, insurance terms)? Options: Audited final cost reports from prior IPD projects, Independent owner-side cost audit, References / interviews with prior owners, Detailed insurance and bonding terms, Simulated target-cost scenarios
      • Has finance previously reviewed audited outcomes from completed IPD projects? If so, what did they like or dislike? Options: Yes — favorable, Yes — mixed concerns, No — they have not reviewed IPD audits, Unsure
      • What minimum size, structure, or governance of a shared-savings pool would your CFO consider meaningful? Options: % of project cost (please specify in next field), Fixed-dollar minimum (please specify in next field), No minimum — structure matters more
      • If you had to name one non-negotiable financial control the CFO wants, what would it be?

      How Transparent Can We Be With Cost & Decision Data?

      • Would you be able to provide historical audited final costs and change-order logs from comparable projects for due diligence? Options: Yes, available and sharable, Yes, but needs redaction/approval, Only partial data available, No, not available
      • Which systems hold your project cost and schedule data today? Options: ERP / Finance system, Project management software (Procore, Aconex, etc.), Spreadsheets, Owner-developed systems, Other
      • How comfortable is your team sharing real-time cost-to-complete and subcontractor rates with an IPD team and an independent auditor? Options: Fully comfortable, Comfortable with controls, Uncomfortable, Not possible due to policy
      • What audit standards/formats must cost reporting meet (e.g., GAAP, AIA audit guide, owner-specific templates)? Options: GAAP-based, AIA audit guide, Owner-specific template, Independent forensic accounting, Unsure / to be defined
      • Are there confidentiality or regulatory limits (e.g., donor restrictions, patient data proximity) that would restrict data sharing? Please explain.

      What Governance Would Make You Feel Safe With Shared Risk?

      • What oversight mechanisms would make you comfortable that shared savings are fairly measured and distributed? Options: Independent audit panel, Owner-appointed finance observer, Monthly transparent dashboards, Escrowed shared-savings account with third-party trustee, Pre-agreed dispute resolution panel
      • What dispute-resolution approach would your organization accept if a multi-party disagreement arose? Options: Mediation then arbitration, Independent adjudicator, Executive steering committee decision, Litigation as last resort
      • What insurance, bonding, or indemnity terms are non-negotiable for you?
      • Which decision authorities would you insist retain final sign-off (examples: scope changes > X$, schedule extensions > X days)?
      • Are there governance models you’d categorically reject? Why?

      What Would a Low-Risk Test of IPD Look Like for You?

      • If we proposed a limited pilot (e.g., a single design-phase sprint or a trade partner pull-planning pilot), which type would you be most open to trying? Options: Target Value Design sprint, Co-located design week, Trade partner pull-planning session, Independent audit of a prior project, Financial modelling simulation
      • What minimal commitments would you need from your side to run that pilot (people, data, approvals, indemnities)?
      • How soon could you make those commitments if the pilot addressed your top concerns? Options: Immediately (weeks), Within 1–3 months, 3–6 months, Longer / TBD
      • What would count as a successful pilot—what signals or metrics would change your mind? Options: Clear constructability fixes implemented, Cost estimate reduction vs baseline, Leadership confidence increased, Trade partner engagement demonstrated, Auditability of costs proven
      • Who else should join a pilot conversation to help you decide—please list names/titles and their priority level for inclusion.
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define target cost, schedule, quality metrics, and the measurable signals that will prove IPD success for the owner and CFO.

    Discovery Questions

    Opening Chapter: A Quick Project Snapshot

    • Tell us the project name, campus or facility, and the single sentence mission this capital project must accomplish for your organization.
    • Where are you in the timeline today? Options: Concept / pre-design, Schematic design, Design development, Permitting, Procurement, Under construction, Other
    • What is the ballpark target cost or funding envelope (give a number or a % range relative to current estimate)? Options: Under $5M, $5M–$25M, $25M–$100M, $100M–$300M, $300M+, Percentage below current estimate (specify in next field)
    • Who is the decision owner for budget and who will be the primary CFO-level reviewer for this project? (Name / role / best contact)
    • What would a ‘win’ look like for your facilities leadership team on day one of occupancy? Be concrete — not just “on budget” but the outcomes you’d notice.
    • Which outcomes are most important to you right now? (pick up to three) Options: Lowest absolute cost, Predictable final cost (auditability), Fastest delivery, Highest clinical/operational quality, Lowest lifecycle cost, Minimal operational disruption

    If Cost Was Your North Star, Are You Sailing or Drifting?

    • When you hear “target cost” what’s the first question or worry that comes to mind?
    • Do you have an internal baseline estimate (e.g., AACE, RSMeans, previously audited cost) we should use to form a target cost band? Options: Yes — audited baseline available, Yes — internal estimate only, No baseline yet, Partial/broken data
    • How would you prefer the target cost be set? Options: Owner-led with third-party audit, Collaborative TVD facilitated by GC/Architect, Market-test + negotiated target, Other — describe below
    • If the target cost requires scope tradeoffs, which of the following are acceptable levers? (select all that apply) Options: Value-engineer non-clinical finishes, Defer non-critical program elements, Alternate equipment with equivalent performance, Phased delivery to split scope, Increase owner-funded contingency
    • Describe a recent decision where you accepted a scope change to save cost — what was the tradeoff and how did stakeholders react?

    How Nervous Is the CFO, Really?

    • If we had to put a single sentence on the CFO’s desk that would get them to consider IPD, what would that sentence have to promise or prove?
    • Which of these CFO concerns is the loudest right now? Options: Unaudited final costs / lack of transparency, Potential for open-ended liability, Insufficient governance controls, Too small a shared savings incentive, Perception that architect and GC can collude
    • What level of independent verification would satisfy finance — audited final costs by whom? Options: Independent third-party accountant, Institutional internal audit, Owner-appointed auditor with right to access, Mutual third-party agreed by all parties
    • How much downside risk is the owner willing to carry before the CFO requires additional guarantees or insurance? (select closest) Options: No downside (firm‑fixed for owner), Limited shared downside (cap), Full shared downside as designed, Unsure — need guidance
    • Please describe any internal policies or board-level rules that would limit shared-risk agreements or require special approvals.

    Quality That Doesn’t Break the Budget — What Matters Most?

    • If you had to choose one non-negotiable quality outcome for this project, what would it be (clinical safety, infection control, future flexibility, etc.)?
    • Which quality metrics would persuade clinicians and operations leadership that the project succeeded? Options: Infection rate performance, Room turnover time, Equipment uptime, Acoustics / patient experience scores, Energy consumption / sustainability targets
    • Are there regulatory, accreditation, or licensing quality thresholds we must meet on day one? Please list them.
    • How would you want quality verified and by whom (owner QA team, third-party commissioning agent, clinician sign-off)? Options: Owner QA, Third-party commissioning, Clinician/operator acceptance, Combined sign-off
    • Describe one past project quality failure that still causes you frustration — what happened and what would you want done differently under IPD?

    Signals That Prove IPD Is Working — Beyond Final Cost

    • If you had to show your board three short, objective signals at 50% design and 50% construction to prove IPD is working, what would those signals be?
    • From the list below, which measurable signals would be most credible to your CFO and stakeholders? (pick up to four) Options: Real-time target cost variance < X%, Third-party audited earned value reporting, Fewer RFIs and change orders vs baseline, Trade partner commitment rates to pull planning, Percent of design decisions aligned to TVD, Documented lessons logged and closed
    • What frequency and format of reporting would make those signals believable? (dashboard, weekly snapshot, monthly audit packet) Options: Real-time dashboard, Weekly one-page snapshot, Monthly audited packet, Quarterly executive review
    • Who in your organization will be responsible for validating those signals and escalating concerns?
    • What are the consequences you want tied to these signals (e.g., release of shared savings, governance interventions, scope rework)?

    When Timelines Slip, Who Gets Blamed? Let's Reframe That

    • Imagine we hit a critical path delay — what outcome would make you feel the team handled it responsibly rather than pointing fingers?
    • Which milestone dates can’t move without material operational impact? Options: Occupancy date, Phase 1 clinical readiness, Licensing/inspection deadlines, Funding draw milestones, Other — specify
    • How much schedule float do you consider acceptable before you require acceleration money or contingency draw? Options: No float — strict date, 1–4 weeks, 1–3 months, More than 3 months, Depends on milestone
    • Would you be open to paying for a controlled schedule acceleration if it protected critical milestones? If so, describe how decisions should be made and funded.
    • Describe how your team prefers to resolve trade-offs between cost and schedule when both are under pressure.

    How Will We Know We're Aligned — Governance & Audit Readiness

    • What level of transparency do you expect on day‑to‑day costs and decisions — open books to the penny, rolled-up summaries, or something in between? Options: Full open‑book to all parties, Summarized roll‑ups with audit rights, Owner-only detailed access, Other — explain
    • Who on your side will sit in the governance rhythm (daily/weekly review, executive checkpoints)? Provide roles rather than names if preferred.
    • Which audit rights are mandatory for you? Options: Access to original contracts and subcontracts, Right to inspect invoices and timecards, Independent forensic audit on final costs, Periodic spot audits
    • What data systems (ERP, CMMS, cost systems) do we need to integrate or feed to produce credible reports?
    • Tell us about your previous governance cadence — what worked, what broke, and what would you never repeat?

    Signing Off: What Would Make You Confident to Commit?

    • What single deliverable, document, or evidence item would move your CFO from skeptical to comfortable with an IPD multi‑party agreement?
    • Would you prefer a pilot (limited-scope IPD) or a full multi-party agreement on this project? Options: Pilot / phased IPD, Full MPA for entire project, Undecided — need recommendation
    • What legal or procurement constraints (board approvals, public procurement rules, insurance limits) must be addressed before you can sign a shared‑risk MPA?
    • What timeline would you need to review draft IPD terms and reach a sign‑off decision? Options: Within 2 weeks, 2–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, Longer — please specify
    • Who else should we engage now to shorten the path to commitment (CFO, General Counsel, Board member, Clinician leader)? List roles.
  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through how integrated delivery, target value design, and shared savings resolve the customer’s past adversarial failures using their project scenarios.

    Experience Meetings

    • Current State & Consequence Confirmation
    • Solution Experience — Scenario Walkthrough
    • Financial Modeling & Shared Savings Mechanics Workshop
    • CFO Executive Briefing & Validation
    • Validation & Mutual Readiness Check
    • Confirm the authorization path and timeline for finance/legal approval to proceed to Mutual Commit.
    • Demonstrate, using the customer's own scenarios, that IPD/TVD/shared savings directly resolve the previously quantified failures.
    • Obtain explicit validation from the owner and CFO that the presented IPD responses address the core problems.
    • Identify any gaps in evidence or questions that must be resolved in the financial workshop.
    • Modeling team to receive scenario inputs and produce a draft financial simulation for the Financial Modeling workshop
    • Capture any validation objections and assign owners to close them before the CFO briefing
    • Collect any missing artifacts (e.g., procurement rules or insurance certificates) identified during walkthrough
    • Review Modeling Assumptions
    • Produce a draft target-cost model and scenario simulations that quantify owner benefit and residual risk.
    • Agree on a provisional shared savings pool size and split mechanics acceptable to owner and CFO.
    • Define the audit evidence and payout triggers that will be required in the multi-party agreement.
    • Identify outstanding legal/finance items required to advance to contract negotiation.
    • Modeler to circulate the completed spreadsheet and sensitivity outputs
    • Finance to provide any accounting constraints and approval for proposed payout timing
    • Legal to draft required audit clause language and escrow mechanics for review
    • Schedule CFO Executive Briefing to confirm risk thresholds and final approval path
    • Opening: One-Sentence Future State for CFO
    • Obtain the CFO's explicit agreement that the modeled IPD mechanics, audit process, and controls are sufficient to protect the owner's financial interests.
    • Secure a clear list of any remaining CFO conditions to be resolved before multi-party agreement signature.
    • Welcome & Objectives
    • CFO to provide written risk thresholds and any accounting constraints required for finalization
    • Finance to validate payout timing against cash-flow constraints and provide feedback
    • Legal to prepare conditional multi-party agreement terms reflecting CFO conditions
    • Quick Reconfirm: Current State, Consequence, Future State
    • All key stakeholders explicitly validate the future state and agree to proceed (or list conditions for doing so).
    • Close or assign owners and deadlines for all outstanding issues needed before Mutual Commit.
    • Produce a readiness checklist and agreed timeline for starting Target Value Design and co-location.
    • Finalize and distribute the readiness checklist with owners and deadlines
    • Legal to produce the draft multi-party agreement reflecting agreed mechanics and CFO conditions
    • Project lead to schedule the Pre-Deployment Readiness kickoff and confirm co-location logistics
    • Facilitator to circulate meeting minutes, signed one-sentence current/future states, and the scenario/proof archive
    • Produce a single-sentence current-state that everyone can repeat and validate.
    • Quantify the monetary, schedule, and operational consequences of past adversarial failures for each scenario.
    • Assemble the scenario artifacts and owner contacts needed for the Solution Experience.
    • Secure agreement on the success signals the owner and CFO will use to judge IPD outcomes.
    • Owner to deliver audited final cost reports and change-order logs for each scenario
    • Project team to confirm stakeholder list and decision roles to include in upcoming workshops
    • Facilitator to draft the one-sentence current-state and circulate for sign-off
    • Schedule the Scenario Walkthrough meeting and send prework checklist
    • Opening: Re-state Current State & Consequence
    • Craft One-Sentence Current State
    • Scenario 1 — Diagnosis (owner presents)
    • Review Outputs (scenarios, model, CFO feedback)
    • Results from Scenario Simulations
    • Build Target Cost Baseline
    • Simulate Scenario Outcomes
    • Present Past Project Scenarios (3 max)
    • Open Issues & Risk Register
    • Audit & Certification Process
    • Scenario 1 — IPD Response & Proof
    • Readiness Checklist for TVD Kickoff
    • Scenario 1 — Validation
    • Quantify Consequences
    • Shared Savings Payout & Controls
    • Define Shared Savings Pool & Split Mechanics
    • Scenario 2 — Diagnosis & IPD Proof
    • Auditability & Payout Triggers
    • Risk Allocation, Insurance & Dispute Triggers
    • Decision Point: Proceed to Solution Scope / Mutual Commit
    • Confirm Success Signals
  4. Solution Scope

    Define the multi-party responsibilities, scope boundaries, target cost mechanics, shared savings pool, and audit rights.

    Scope Configuration

    • Execute Multi-Party Integrated Project Agreement
    • Set Up Co-Located Project Office and IT
    • Implement Shared Cost-Tracking and Accounting System
    • Administer Shared Savings Pool Disbursements
    • Provide BIM Integration and Federated Model Management
    • Insert Constructability Inputs into Design Models
    • Package and Release Trade Work Packages
    • Procure and Manage Long-Lead Equipment
    • Fabricate and Deliver Prefabricated Modules and Mockups
    • Deploy On-Site Lean Coach and Field Support
    • Run Weekly Integrated Field Coordination Walks
    • Install Temporary Site Logistics and Infection Control

    Scope Questions

    Execute Multi-Party Integrated Project Agreement

    • Do you intend to execute a formal multi-party integrated project agreement (MPA) for this project? Options: Yes, No, Undecided
    • Which parties must be signatories on the MPA? Options: Owner, Architect/Engineer, General Contractor, Major Trade Partners, Construction Manager, Other
    • What primary commercial objectives should the MPA address (select all that apply)? Options: Shared savings pool, Target cost mechanism, Risk allocation, Dispute resolution, Insurance allocation, Performance incentives
    • What dispute resolution methods do you prefer to include in the MPA? Options: Mediation, Arbitration, Escalation ladder/technical panel, Litigation, Step negotiation then mediation
    • Are there specific insurance or bonding requirements the owner or lenders insist on? Options: Yes, No, Unsure—need counsel
    • Who will lead legal negotiation of the MPA on the owner's side? Options: In-house counsel, Outside counsel (owner-selected), GC/Design counsel will propose, No lead yet
    • Please list any non-negotiable contract terms or regulatory constraints that must be in the MPA (e.g., state procurement rules, public entity clauses).

    Set Up Co-Located Project Office and IT

    • Do you plan to establish a co-located project office for design and delivery teams during design? Options: Yes - full time, Yes - part time/hybrid, No - virtual only, Undecided
    • What physical space requirements do you anticipate for a co-located office (sq ft, number of workstations, meeting rooms)?
    • What IT services are required for the co-located office? Options: High-speed internet/Wi-Fi, Secure VPN/Remote access, Video conferencing systems, Shared printers/scanners, Model viewing workstations
    • Are there security or HIPAA/compliance constraints for on-site data access or model viewing? Options: Yes - HIPAA/PHI concerned, Yes - other regulatory, No special constraints, Unsure
    • Do you require a single hosted collaboration platform (e.g., Common Data Environment) for all parties? Options: Yes - owner-hosted, Yes - GC/Design-hosted, No - multiple tools ok, Undecided
    • Will team members need remote participation capability and what tools are preferred? Options: Zoom, Teams, Webex, Other, Prefer in-person only
    • Are there IT support or SOW expectations for maintaining the co-located office (helpdesk hours, admin staff)?

    Implement Shared Cost-Tracking and Accounting System

    • Do you require a shared cost-tracking system to feed the target cost and shared savings calculations? Options: Yes, No, Partial—owner will keep separate books
    • Which accounting systems or ERPs must the shared tracker integrate with (owner/GC/vendor systems)? Options: Oracle/Primavera, SAP, QuickBooks, Sage, Other, No integration required
    • Who will have read/write access to cost entries, and who will be view-only? Options: Owner - full, GC - full, Design - view only, Third-party auditor - view only, Custom roles
    • What frequency of cost reporting do you need (for governance and cashflow)? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Event-driven
    • Do you require audit trails and timestamped evidence for every posted cost and change order? Options: Yes - full audit trail, Yes - limited, No
    • Who will operate/house the shared ledger (owner accounting team, third-party administrator, GC finance)? Options: Owner, GC, Third-party administrator, Other
    • Please describe any chart-of-accounts or cost-coding structures that must be used.

    Administer Shared Savings Pool Disbursements

    • Should a formal shared savings pool be established for the project? Options: Yes, No, Conditional - based on target cost certainty
    • What percent of project underrun should be allocated to the shared savings pool (or select alternative)? Options: Fixed percentage (specify), Tiered formula, Not yet decided, No pool
    • What governance body will approve and authorize pool disbursements? Options: Designated Steering Committee, Owner-only, Third-party administrator, Consensus of signatories
    • Which events trigger pool disbursement (e.g., verified final cost audit, milestone completions)? Options: Final audited closeout, Periodic verified milestones, Interim releases, Other
    • Are tax, reporting, or grant restrictions likely to affect distribution of savings? Options: Yes - tax/grant constraints, No, Unsure - require finance review
    • Do you want an independent third-party to calculate and certify savings and distributions? Options: Yes, No, Optional
    • Please describe the proposed distribution formula or priorities (e.g., owner first, then team split, reserves).

    Provide BIM Integration and Federated Model Management

    • Which disciplines/models need to be federated (architectural, structural, MEP, medical equipment, site)? Options: Architectural, Structural, MEP, Medical Equipment, Civil/Site, Other
    • What level of detail (LOD) is required at each design milestone for coordination? Options: LOD 200, LOD 300, LOD 350, LOD 400, Custom per discipline
    • Which modeling platforms/formats must be supported (Revit, Navisworks, IFC, Bentley)? Options: Revit, Navisworks, IFC, Bentley, Other
    • How often should clash detection and federated coordination runs occur? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Milestone-based
    • Who will own the federated model and manage version control? Options: Owner, GC/BIM lead, Design team, Third-party BIM manager
    • Are there specific naming conventions, file structures, or data handover requirements? Options: Yes - provide standards, No standard yet, Use industry standard (NBS/BIMforum)
    • Please list any downstream uses of the federated model (facilities management, prefabrication, O&M manuals).

    Insert Constructability Inputs into Design Models

    • At what design milestones should constructability reviews be scheduled? Options: Schematic, Design Development, 100% CD, Ongoing during iteration
    • Which parties should participate in constructability reviews (trade partners, prefabrication vendors)? Options: GC team, Trade partners, Prefabrication vendors, Architect/Engineer, Owner representatives
    • Do you require marked-up constructability inputs to be embedded directly into the BIM/model? Options: Yes - annotated in model, No - separate reports only, Both
    • How should constructability recommendations be tracked and resolved (RFI register, issue log, model change request)? Options: RFI register, Issue/deficiency log, Model change request workflow, Other
    • Do you expect trades to provide prefabrication design feedback that will change model geometry? Options: Yes - expected, No, Maybe - depends on scope
    • Who is authorized to approve design adjustments driven by constructability input? Options: Design lead/AE, Owner rep, Integrated change control board, Consensus of signatories
    • Please describe any historical constructability failures we should avoid (e.g., coordination clashes, MEP access issues).

    Package and Release Trade Work Packages

    • Do you want trade scope packaged by zone, system, or work type for release? Options: By zone/area, By system (MEP/Structural), By work type (drywall, finishes), Hybrid
    • What level of package detail is required to enable fabrication/prefab (drawings, BOM, model extracts)? Options: Full fabrication package, Shop drawing level, Construction-level drawings, High-level scope only
    • Will trade packages be released in phased waves tied to pull planning milestones? Options: Yes - phased, No - bulk release, Hybrid
    • Do you require prequalification or specific vendor criteria before awarding packages? Options: Yes - prequalification, No, Only for critical trades
    • Who is responsible for package assembly and QA prior to release (GC, design, 3rd party)? Options: GC, Design team, Third-party package manager, Joint team
    • What procurement method do you prefer for trade packages (lump sum, GMP, negotiated, unit price)? Options: Lump sum, GMP, Negotiated, Unit price/Time & Materials
    • Please provide any constraints on lead times, delivery windows, or site access that affect package release.

    Procure and Manage Long-Lead Equipment

    • Do you have a defined list of long-lead items (medical equipment, chillers, AHUs, MEP skids)? Options: Yes - list provided, No - need to identify, Partial list
    • Who will own procurement risk and vendor selection for long-lead items? Options: Owner, GC, Joint procurement committee, Third-party procurement agent
    • What lead-time contingencies or procurement windows must be planned for (months)? Options: <3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, >12 months
    • Do long-lead items require staging, specialized handling, or on-site storage prior to installation? Options: Yes - staging required, No, Maybe - depends on item
    • Should procurement include performance warranties, factory acceptance tests (FAT), or integrated testing plans? Options: Yes - FAT and warranties, Warranties only, No
    • Do you expect owner-furnished equipment (OFE) and who will coordinate installation interfaces? Options: Yes - owner furnishes, No
    • Please list any suppliers or preferred vendors already selected for long-lead items.

    Fabricate and Deliver Prefabricated Modules and Mockups

    • Is off-site prefabrication or modularization part of the scope (bathroom pods, MEP racks, casework)? Options: Yes - extensive prefab, Yes - limited mockups, No
    • What volumetric or panelized prefabrication types are anticipated? Options: Volumetric modules, Panelized systems, MEP skids, Casework/mockups, Other
    • Do you require mockups for owner/clinical approvals prior to bulk fabrication? Options: Yes - onsite mockups, Yes - offsite mockups, No
    • Who will be responsible for factory QA/QC and acceptance criteria? Options: Fabricator, GC quality team, Owner/clinical rep, Third-party inspector
  5. Mutual Commit

    Negotiate the multi-party agreement terms: risk/reward splits, dispute resolution, insurance, and readiness commitments from each party.

    Agreement Modules

    • Multi-Party Agreement (MPA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Target Cost & Shared Savings Schedule
    • Risk & Reward Allocation Matrix
    • Governance & Dispute Resolution Charter
    • Insurance & Indemnity Schedule
    • Readiness & Mobilization Commitments
    • Audit & Accounting Access Agreement
    • Change Management & Scope Adjustment Process
    • Payment, Funding & Escrow Schedule
    • Termination, Exit & Transition Rights
    • Confidentiality & Data Sharing Agreement
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm team co-location, lean maturity, audit access, trade partner commitments, and data needed to start target value design and pull planning.

      Readiness Questions

      Quick Start: Tell Us About This Project

      • What is the project name, facility type, and the single line description you use internally?
      • Which stage is the project currently in? Options: Feasibility / Concept, Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents, Procurement, Pre-construction
      • What is the owner’s headline target for cost and schedule (e.g., $XM / open date Q3 2028)?
      • Who will be the primary internal sponsor for this decision (name and role)?
      • How would you describe the CFO’s top concern about moving to an IPD model? Options: Risk of cost overruns, Lack of auditability, Insurance/indemnity exposure, Cultural trust with firms, Unclear shared savings mechanics, Other

      If IPD Is Supposed to Fix This, Why Didn’t It Before?

      • What's one recurring failure from past projects that you would refuse to accept again?
      • When projects went adversarial in the past, who tended to absorb the biggest pain and why? Options: Owner, Architect/Design team, General contractor, Trade partners, Patients/staff through disruption, Other
      • How confident are you that the multi-party agreement will prevent the blame cycles you’ve seen? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Unsure, Not confident
      • What would prove to you that collaboration didn’t just sound good on paper but actually changed behavior on site?
      • How long has this pattern of cost/schedule disputes been affecting your projects? Options: This is the first time, A few years, Several projects over a decade, Decades

      Who’s Actually Holding the Keys?

      • If we had to map decision authority today, who signs final trade approvals, budget changes, and schedule pushes?
      • Which individuals or committees must be involved in every material IPD decision to maintain your governance comfort? Options: CFO/Finance, VP of Capital Projects, Hospital/Facility leadership, Board/Executive committee, Clinical leadership, Other
      • How much time do your decision-makers typically need to respond to a governance request during design (e.g., 24 hours, 1 week)? Options: <24 hours, 24-72 hours, 3-7 days, >7 days
      • Who on your team will act as the daily point of contact for co-location and pull planning commitments?
      • What has made your governance either accelerate or stall decisions in previous projects? Give a specific example.

      Are You Sitting On The Data We’ll Need?

      • What baseline documents or datasets can you commit to sharing at the start of target value design? Options: Existing program/room-by-room requirements, Historical O&M costs, Previous bid packages, Site utility drawings, Budget broken by workstream, None available
      • How auditable are your historical final costs for similar projects—do you have line-item, invoice-level records? Options: Yes, invoice-level and audited, Partial detail available, High-level only, No reliable records
      • Which internal systems will we need API or report access to (e.g., ERP, CMMS, procurement)?
      • Who will own data governance and permissions for sharing sensitive financial information with third parties?
      • Are there any legal, privacy, or contractual restrictions that could delay data sharing? If so, how long to resolve them? Options: None, Some, minor (days-weeks), Significant (weeks-months), Unknown

      Can Your Team Live Co-Located?

      • If co-location is required, what space and facilities can you realistically dedicate for a shared team? Options: On-campus office space, Temporary leased space nearby, Virtual-only (no physical space), Combination of office & virtual
      • What resistance do you anticipate from internal staff about being colocated with contractor and architect teams? Options: Cultural discomfort, Union/HR restrictions, Scheduling conflicts, No resistance expected, Other
      • How many owner-side full-time equivalents (FTEs) can be allocated to daily co-location during design and pre-construction? Options: 0, 1-2, 3-5, 6-10, 10+
      • Have you assigned a physical advocate—someone empowered to make on-the-spot tradeoffs during target value design? Options: Yes, named and empowered, Yes, named but limited authority, No, not yet
      • What would make co-location feel safe and productive for your leaders (e.g., separate owner room, defined hours, confidentiality protocols)?

      Lean Muscle Check — How Deep Is It?

      • If lean methods are a precondition, how would you rate your organization’s familiarity with pull planning and target value design? Options: Experienced and practiced, Some exposure, Heard of it but little practice, No familiarity
      • Describe a time when your team adopted a new process—how long from first training to measurable behavioral change?
      • Which internal training or coaching resources could we leverage to accelerate lean adoption? Options: In-house trainers, Vendor training budget, External consultants, None
      • What would cause your staff to revert to old adversarial habits under cost pressure, and how have you prevented that elsewhere?
      • How comfortable are your clinical leaders with participating in pull planning sessions that may shift clinical priorities to meet cost targets? Options: Very comfortable, Somewhat comfortable, Reluctant, Unknown

      Trade Partner Commitment — Will They Show Up?

      • How do you currently prequalify trade partners for collaboration and early design involvement? Options: Past IPD work, Lean certifications, Interview panel, Standard qualifications only, We don't prequalify
      • Would you expect trade partners to sign a commitment to early involvement and shared targets? If so, which incentives are acceptable? Options: Guaranteed scope, Early-access to work packages, Shared savings participation, No incentives required, Other
      • Which trades do you anticipate being critical to lock in before design-to-construction sequencing begins? Options: M&E (HVAC/Plumbing/Electrical), Concrete/Structure, Specialty medical systems, Fire protection, Finishes/Partitions, Other
      • Have you had trade partners walk away from collaborative commitments previously? If yes, why? Options: Payment/scope concerns, Cultural mismatch, Insurance/contract issues, Scheduling conflicts, No, never
      • How would we measure a trade partner’s readiness—what red flags should we know about? Options: Lack of lean experience, Thin balance sheet, High backlog, Poor communication history, Strong track record

      Money, Audit & Governance — Where's the Trust?

      • What level of transparency does your CFO require on cost reporting to accept a shared savings model? Options: Full invoice-level auditability, Monthly summarized reporting, Quarterly reconciled reports, Undefined/negotiable
      • Are you prepared to allow independent audits of final costs and savings? If not, what are the constraints? Options: Yes—no constraints, Yes—with limited scope, No—policy or legal barriers, Unsure
      • Who will approve the mechanics of the target cost and shared savings pool from your side? Options: CFO/Finance, VP Capital Projects, Legal, Board/Executive, Other
      • How do you want risk/reward splits presented—high-level percentages or modeled scenarios with examples? Options: High-level percentages, Modeled scenarios with examples, Both, Unsure
      • What insurance, indemnity, or procurement policies could complicate a multi-party agreement?

      What Could Make This Fail — Tell Us the Hard Truth

      • If a worst-case history repeats, what single event would prove the model failed (e.g., withheld information, rushed decisions, audit dispute)?
      • How tolerant is leadership of early missteps—are they willing to fund coaching and course-correction during adoption? Options: Very tolerant, Somewhat tolerant, Low tolerance, Unknown
      • Which stakeholder’s withdrawal would most likely collapse the collaborative model, and why? Options: Owner leadership, CFO/Finance, Architect, General contractor, Key trade partner, Other
      • What early warning signals would you want the team to escalate immediately? Options: Cost trend variance > X%, Missed pull-plan milestones, Governance decision delays, Stakeholder disengagement, Quality deviations
      • What’s one non-negotiable you require to stay engaged in an IPD approach?

      Ready to Pull the Trigger — Practical Next Steps

      • Based on our conversation, what three items must be resolved before you’d approve beginning target value design?
      • What is your preferred timeline for starting co-location and the first pull-planning session? Options: Immediately (within 2 weeks), Within 1 month, 1-3 months, Longer than 3 months
      • Who should we include on the kickoff invite to ensure decisions can be made in real time?
      • What remaining questions or concerns would you like us to address in a focused follow-up conversation?
      • Would you be willing to share an audited final-cost example from a prior project (redacted if needed) to accelerate CFO comfort? Options: Yes—can share, Yes—need NDAs, No—cannot share, Unsure
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule and execute design-to-construction sequencing, co-location cadence, and pull-planning milestones with clear owners.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify target cost tracking, auditability of final costs, lean practice adoption, and governance is operating as agreed.

      Validation Questions

      Quick Check: Who's in the Room?

      • Who will be the primary project sponsor and day-to-day owner contact for validation activities? Options: VP of Capital Projects, Facilities Director, CFO, Program Director, Procurement Director, Other
      • Which stakeholders must sign off on final audited costs? Options: Owner CFO, Owner Legal, Board/Trustees, Program Director, Project Controls, External Auditor, Other
      • Which best describes your organization's prior experience with IPD or multi-party agreements? Options: Led several IPD projects, Participated in one IPD project, Evaluated IPD but not executed, Never used IPD
      • Please list any external parties (auditors, bond counsel, insurers) who must be included in cost validation conversations.
      • How urgent is it for you that validation systems are verified before the next procurement or major milestone? Options: Critical — must be verified now, Important — before major procurement, Preferable — but flexible timing, Not urgent

      Are We Sure the Numbers Would Hold Up?

      • What if the target cost numbers you’re relying on wouldn’t withstand an independent audit—how would that change your willingness to share risk?
      • How do you currently collect and reconcile design estimates, subcontractor quotes, and change order documentation? Options: Centralized estimating tool, Spreadsheets, Contractor submissions only, Finance/GL reconciliation, Other
      • Which systems currently hold the definitive cost records for your projects? Options: ERP/Finance system, Estimating software (e.g., Hard Dollar), PM tool (Procore, Aconex), Shared cloud folders (SharePoint, Box), Spreadsheets only, Other
      • Who currently has direct access to raw cost entries, supporting invoices, and subcontractor agreements? Options: Owner finance team, Project controls, Architect/Designer, General contractor, External auditor, Other
      • When was the last time your finance team performed a line-item audit of a project closeout, and what were the top three findings?

      What Broke Last Time — and Why?

      • When a past project blew budget or schedule, what single decision or missing control do you now suspect was the real turning point?
      • Tell us the story of one project where costs spiraled—what broke first (scope, procurement, change control, documentation)?
      • Which behaviors drove the response as costs escalated—collaboration, finger-pointing, or silent acquiescence? Options: Collaborative problem-solving, Defensive blame-shifting, Siloed/slow response, Mixed
      • Which controls or practices were missing that, if present, would have materially changed the outcome? Options: Real-time cost dashboards, Stronger procurement rules, Clear audit trail for changes, Trade partner accountability clauses, Lean pull-planning integration, Other
      • What would you have wanted the GC and architect to do differently in that moment?

      Who Holds the Keys to Auditability?

      • If an independent auditor arrived tomorrow, where would they find the weakest link in our document trail?
      • Do you have a documented workflow for collecting, naming, and storing source documents (invoices, subcontracts, change orders)? Options: Yes — formal, enforced workflow, Partially — informal habits exist, No documented workflow
      • Which platform should be treated as the system of record for audits on this project? Options: Owner ERP/Finance, Third‑party audit portal, PM tool (Procore/Aconex), Shared cloud folder (SharePoint/Box), Undecided
      • How often should cost packages and change logs be reconciled to the general ledger to be audit-ready? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, At milestone close, Ad hoc/as-needed
      • Who on your side will be responsible for producing source documentation and attesting to cost entries during an audit? Options: CFO/Finance, Project Controls, Program Director, Procurement, External accounting firm, Other

      If Costs Drift, Who Actually Feels the Pain?

      • Imagine the project is 5% over target cost—who in your organization loses credibility or budget first, and why?
      • At what threshold of cost overrun does your CFO require formal escalation or an executive decision? Options: Any overrun, 1–3%, 3–5%, 5–10%, Above 10%
      • Which existing financial mechanisms do you rely on to protect the owner's position (contingency, insurance, separate reserves)? Options: Project contingency, Owner-held reserve, Builder’s risk insurance, Performance bonds, Shared savings pool, None/unsure
      • What shared savings pool structure (size or trigger) would feel meaningful to your CFO? Options: >5% of target cost, 2–5% of target cost, <2% of target cost, Performance tiers rather than percentage, Unsure — need proposal
      • When cost pressure rises, which corrective actions do you prefer we prioritize? Options: Tighten scope, Re-sequence work, Use contingency, Pause procurement, Negotiate trade scopes, Other

      Is Lean a Living Practice or a Slide Deck?

      • Would you be comfortable being evaluated on lean metrics—and do you expect the score to reflect reality or optimism?
      • How mature is your organization's lean construction capability right now? Options: Advanced — company-wide, Established on some projects, Pilot-stage, Not adopted
      • Which lean practices are already used on your projects? Options: Target Value Design, Pull planning / Last Planner, Co-location, Visual management, A3 problem solving, None
      • Can you describe an example where lean practice changed a design decision or saved cost on one of your projects?
      • What lean metrics would convince your CFO that collaboration is delivering measurable value? Options: Percent tasks completed as planned, Cycle time reduction, Labor-hour variance vs plan, Number of RFIs reduced, Percent of pull planning milestones met, Other

      Can Governance Catch Problems Before They Become Crisis?

      • If governance becomes ceremonial, surprises will persist—what concrete checks do you want in place to prevent that?
      • What governance cadence do you prefer during deployment (meetings, dashboards, decision gates)? Options: Weekly operations, Bi-weekly steering, Monthly executive, Event-driven (thresholds), Other
      • Which types of decisions must be escalated to the multi-party board and within what timeframe? Options: Cost reallocations, Major scope changes, Contingency draws, Contractor substitutions, All above based on thresholds
      • How should disputes over audit findings be resolved on this project? Options: Internal arbitration, External mediator, Binding third-party arbitration, Litigation, Other
      • Which governance artifacts do you want produced before deployment (charter, RACI, audit protocol, etc.)? Options: Charter & RACI, Audit protocol & checklist, Escalation matrix, Decision log templates, Communications plan, Other

      Let's Make Validation Practical — What Do We Do Next?

      • If we could only implement three validation safeguards before the next procurement, which would move the needle most for you? Options: Select system of record, Set regular audit checkpoints, Lean training for core team, Define access & dashboards, Add trade partner audit clauses, Finalize shared savings structure
      • Who on your team can commit time to validation setup workshops and what percent allocation can they provide? Options: Project sponsor (10%+), Project Controls (20%+), Finance (10%+), Procurement (10%+), No capacity currently
      • Which project phase would make these safeguards most effective to implement? Options: Before Schematic Design, Before Design Development, Before Construction Documents, Before procurement/pre-construction, Currently in construction
      • What specific deliverable would help your CFO sign off on readiness (one‑page checklist, sample audit report, dashboard mockup)? Options: One-page Validation Checklist, Sample audited closeout report, Dashboard mockup with access plan, Draft multi-party audit protocol, Other
      • Are there constraints (procurement rules, union agreements, IT security, confidentiality) we must solve to enable auditability? Please list.
      • Would you like us to draft and share a concise Validation Checklist for your CFO to review after this session? Options: Yes — please draft it, Maybe — need more info first, No — not at this time
  7. Success

    Review outcomes against success signals, capture lessons learned, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Outcomes Review & Success Signal Validation
    • Financial Reconciliation & Shared Savings Audit Review
    • Lessons Learned & Continuous Improvement Workshop
    • Governance Handover & Ongoing Issue Channel Setup
    • Operations Handoff & Warranty / Closeout Review

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Create the shared channel, invite named users, and publish channel guidelines and retention policy.
    • Prepare and send payment instructions and accounting entries to the owner/CFO for approval and execution.
    • Archive financial audit trail to agreed secure repository with access rights documented.
    • Workshop Framing & Goals
    • Produce a documented set of prioritized improvement actions with owners and deadlines.
    • Capture successful practices to be codified into the IPD playbook and future team selection criteria.
    • Create a plan to measure whether implemented improvements produce the intended effects on future projects.
    • Publish the Lessons Learned Report with top 5 improvements, owners, deadlines, and acceptance criteria.
    • Add approved playbook changes to the master IPD playbook and schedule training sessions for next project kickoff.
    • Create an improvement-tracking board (backlog) and invite owners to report monthly progress.
    • Capture exemplar artifacts (meeting agendas, pull-plan templates, audit checklists) into a shared repository.
    • Review Closeout Governance Responsibilities
    • Create and provision a shared issue and enhancement channel with documented access and roles.
    • Define triage categories, SLA targets, and an escalation matrix to handle post-close issues quickly and transparently.
    • Confirm audit access rules and a reporting cadence for ongoing governance and improvement oversight.
    • Introductions & Meeting Objectives
    • Publish the triage matrix and SLA document and assign first responders for each category.
    • Schedule the first quarterly governance review and add recurring reporting owners.
    • Provision audit access accounts and document how to request archived project artifacts.
    • Inventory of O&M Deliverables & Warranties
    • Deliver and confirm acceptance of all O&M documentation, as-builts, and warranty records to facilities leadership.
    • Ensure facilities staff are scheduled and prepared for required training with clear competency outcomes.
    • Agree on POE metrics and schedule to evaluate whether operational performance meets the intended future state.
    • Deliver digital O&M repository access and confirm receipt with facilities leadership.
    • Schedule and confirm attendees for hands-on systems training sessions within 30 days.
    • Assign warranty owner and publish the warranty contact list and escalation steps.
    • Set POE data collection start date and assign responsibility for analysis and report delivery.
    • Validate measured outcomes against each agreed success signal with evidence and arrive at a documented acceptance status.
    • Quantify any gaps and assign remediation owners, timelines, and success criteria for closure.
    • Ensure CFO has the financial reconciliation needed to approve shared savings distribution or remedial financial adjustments.
    • Publish a signed Outcomes Validation Report mapping each success signal to evidence and acceptance status.
    • Create remediation tickets for each missed signal with owner, acceptance criteria, and deadline.
    • Collect any outstanding evidence or audit documents requested during the meeting.
    • Schedule follow-up acceptance verification meeting (if remediation required).
    • Audit Scope, Methodology, and Deliverables
    • Obtain joint agreement on audited final cost and the computation of the shared savings pool.
    • Resolve or document contested cost items and set a clear dispute resolution path with deadlines.
    • Finalize payment mechanics and schedule for distribution of shared savings and close financials.
    • Issue the final audited cost and shared savings calculation package signed by auditor and parties.
    • If disputes exist, open formal dispute tickets and assign dispute resolution facilitator with timeline.
    • Recap of Agreed Success Signals
    • Project Timeline & Critical Events
    • Presentation of Audited Final Costs
    • Facility Team Training Plan
    • Define Shared Channel & Access Controls
    • Reconciliation: Target Cost to Final Cost
    • Breakout: What Worked (Reinforce)
    • Final Punchlist and Closeout Verification
    • Presentation of Measured Outcomes (Evidence Pack)
    • Issue Triage & Escalation Matrix
    • Compute Shared Savings Pool & Distribution
    • Breakout: What Failed & Root Cause Analysis
    • Enhancement Backlog Management
    • Maintenance Backlog & Spare Parts Strategy
    • Gap Analysis — Signal-by-Signal
    • Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) Plan
    • Dispute Resolution & Adjustments
    • Prioritize Improvements (Impact vs Effort)
    • CFO & Owner Perspective
    • Audit Access & Data Retention
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.