Professional Services Professional Services & Outsourcing Systems Implementation

ERP Implementation

Advisory, implementation, and operational engagements where trust, alignment, and execution governance determine outcomes.

Accenture Deloitte Cognizant Rimini Street
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align executive sponsors and map current state before deeper solution design.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm executive decision roles, budget authority, timeline constraints, and success metrics with sponsors.

      Alignment Questions

      Quick introductions — who should we be talking to?

      • Which executives should be included in our initial alignment conversations? Options: CIO/CTO, CFO, CEO/President, Head of IT/VP IT, Head of Finance/VP Finance, COO, CHRO/Head of HR, Procurement Lead, Legal Counsel, Other
      • Please provide the single best sponsor contact for day-to-day alignment (name, role, preferred contact method).
      • Who is the ultimate signatory for major commercial commitments (contracts, change orders, >$500k)? Options: CEO/Board, CFO, CIO, Procurement Committee, Divisional President, Other
      • Which functional leaders do you expect to be active decision-makers on scope and acceptance? Options: Finance, Supply Chain, Manufacturing/Operations, HR/Payroll, IT/Infrastructure, Sales/Commercial, Procurement, Legal/Compliance, Other
      • Have any of the named leaders sponsored or led an ERP implementation before? Tell us who and one result or lesson from that experience.

      Who's really calling the shots?

      • If the board could wave a wand, whose decision would actually move this project forward today?
      • Who has final approval over changes to project scope (features, modules, customizations)? Options: Program Sponsor/Executive, Steering Committee, CIO/IT, CFO/Finance, Procurement, Other
      • Who has final approval for budget increases or contingency draws? Options: CFO, CEO/Board, Steering Committee, Program Sponsor, Procurement
      • Who sets or approves the target go-live date? Options: Executive Sponsor, PMO/Program Manager, Steering Committee, External Partner (with Sponsor sign-off), Other
      • How are conflicts between these decision-makers typically escalated and resolved?

      Money, mandates, and maybes

      • How committed is the funding today — fully allocated, approved by board, conditional, or still being sized? Options: Board-approved and allocated, Allocated but awaiting final approval, Conditional on business case milestones, Preliminary estimate only, Unfunded
      • Is the budget structured as a fixed amount, a phased funding model, or flexible based on scope? Options: Fixed, Phased/milestone-based, Flexible within governance, Not yet decided
      • What level of cost overrun is tolerated before leadership must reauthorize (choose the closest): Options: None — strict limit, Up to 5%, 5–10%, 10–20% with justification, Any increase requires board review
      • Are there pre-conditions tied to funding (e.g., executive sign-off, vendor selection, regulatory sign-off)? Please list.
      • If additional investment is required for unforeseen complexities, who would own the decision to proceed? Options: CFO, CEO/Board, Steering Committee, Program Sponsor, Other

      If the timeline shrinks, what breaks first?

      • What immovable dates drive this program (select all that apply)? Options: Regulatory deadline, Fiscal year close, Audit deadline, Merger/acquisition close, Contract renewal, Board reporting, Customer commitments, Other
      • How much schedule compression can your organization tolerate before it materially risks business continuity? Options: None — hard date, 1–4 weeks, 1–3 months, 3–6 months, Flexible beyond 6 months
      • If timelines shorten, which deliverables are you prepared to defer to a subsequent phase? Options: Analytics and BI, Advanced customizations, Non-core integrations, Fresh UI/UX work, Global rollouts – regional first, None — everything is must-have
      • Which internal or external events would force a hard freeze or pause of the program?
      • Who is responsible for the master schedule and for communicating trade-offs to the executive team? Options: PMO/Program Manager, External Implementation Partner, CIO/IT, Steering Committee, Other

      How will we know this actually worked?

      • Which outcome metrics would make the board call this a success? Pick up to five. Options: On-time go-live, On-budget, Data migration accuracy, Reduction in month-end close time, Inventory accuracy improvement, Improved order-to-cash cycle, User adoption % trained, FTE reduction / productivity gain, Regulatory compliance achieved, Other
      • Who will be accountable for tracking and reporting these KPIs after go-live? Options: Program Sponsor, Business Process Owners, PMO/Program Manager, CFO/Finance, IT/Operations, Other
      • What baseline data or measurements exist today for your top KPIs (comprehensive, partial, spotty, none)? Options: Comprehensive and auditable, Partial but usable, Spotty / inconsistent, No baseline available
      • When would you expect to see measurable ROI or operational improvement (select the closest)? Options: 0–6 months post go-live, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, 2+ years, Unsure
      • What acceptance criteria or exit tests would you require before declaring the program a success?

      Politics, allies, and quiet opponents

      • Who stands to lose influence, budget, or comfort if this new ERP succeeds, and how might they react?
      • Which departments have historically slowed or derailed IT programs here, and what were the root causes?
      • Do you have named internal champions who will actively promote change and adoption? Options: Yes — executive sponsor, Yes — business process owner(s), Yes — change lead/PMO, No identified champions, Unsure
      • How direct or subtle do you expect resistance to be (choose the best fit)? Options: Open and vocal, Passive but obstructive, Politically maneuvered, Mostly neutral, Supportive
      • What incentives, governance levers, or communication approaches have historically reduced resistance here?

      Red flags, deal-breakers, and escapes

      • Are there regulatory, contractual, or security constraints that would prevent certain architectures or cloud approaches? Options: Yes — major constraints, Yes — manageable constraints, No significant constraints, Unsure — need to investigate
      • Do existing vendor contracts or long-term support agreements limit our integration or migration options? Options: Yes — significant limitations, Yes — some limitations, No, Unsure
      • Which data domains are legally or operationally restricted (select all that apply)? Options: Finance/GL, Payroll/HR, Customer PII, Supplier contracts, Manufacturing IP, None/No special restrictions
      • Do you require consultants with industry experience, security clearances, or local presence? Please specify. Options: Senior program lead with industry experience, Functional consultants with domain experience, Security-cleared personnel, Local/on-site resources required, Remote resources acceptable, Other
      • What would be a non-negotiable 'no-go' condition before we mobilize a program (e.g., unresolved data holds, missing sponsor, no budget)?

      Next move — aligning on a minimal win

      • If we had to agree on a single immediate milestone to demonstrate progress within 30 days, what would that be? Options: Executive alignment workshop, Validated sponsor and decision matrix, Baseline data inventory and risk log, Preliminary scope and budget estimate, Integration dependency map, Other
      • Who must attend a 60–90 minute sponsor alignment meeting to unblock decisions? (list roles) Options: CEO/Board rep, CFO, CIO, Head of Finance, Head of Operations, PMO Lead, Procurement, External Partner Lead, Other
      • What concrete pre-work can your team commit to delivering within two weeks to accelerate alignment (data extract, org chart, contract copies)?
      • What governance cadence would you prefer for the program ramp (choose one)? Options: Weekly steering + weekly PMO, Biweekly steering + weekly PMO, Monthly steering + weekly PMO, Ad hoc with escalation only, Executive sponsor-led weekly
      • Would you agree to a brief sponsor-only alignment call next week to confirm authority, budget posture, and the 30-day milestone? Options: Yes — schedule it, Maybe — need to confirm, No — prefer different timing
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document legacy landscapes, integrations, data quality issues, and operational pain points that must be addressed.

      Current State

      Start with the Big Picture — Where Are We Now?

      • In two sentences, how would you describe your current ERP and supporting application landscape?
      • Which of the following core systems are active today in your environment? Options: Finance / ERP, Supply Chain / WMS, Manufacturing / MES, HR / Payroll, CRM / Sales, BI / Analytics, Custom legacy apps, Other
      • How is your ERP currently hosted? Options: Cloud (SaaS), Private cloud / hosted, On-premises, Hybrid (mix of cloud and on‑prem), Multiple models across business units, Not sure
      • Which statement best describes your ERP footprint today? Options: Single global instance, Multiple regional instances (2–5), Many fragmented instances (6+), One core system + several bolt‑ons, Unsure / need to confirm
      • When was the last major upgrade, consolidation, or migration effort, and what changed?
      • Who on your team is the day‑to‑day owner for the ERP landscape and integrations? Please name role(s) and primary contact if available.

      What’s Actually Broken — Not the 'Everything' Answer

      • Which single legacy process or system failure do you believe is quietly costing the most time, money, or credibility?
      • Can you share a recent concrete incident (dates, impact, teams affected) that illustrates this problem?
      • How frequently does this issue occur? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Rarely / one‑offs
      • What measurable business outcomes does it affect (revenue, days sales outstanding, stockouts, compliance fines, cycle time, etc.)? Please quantify if possible.
      • What workarounds or manual fixes are in place today, and who bears the burden of those fixes?
      • If we solved this problem tomorrow, what would change in the first 90 days—both operationally and emotionally for your team?

      Hidden Integration Debt — Where Data Gets Lost in Translation

      • How often does data fail to arrive or be reconciled across systems, causing rework, disputes, or missed customer commitments? Options: Constantly, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never / not sure
      • Which types of integrations move critical data today? (Select all that apply) Options: Order-to-cash, Procure-to-pay, Inventory sync, General ledger / financial posting, HR / payroll feed, Supplier EDI, API-based custom integrations, Batch ETL jobs, Other
      • Which middleware or integration platforms do you use (iPaaS, ESB, custom scripts)? Options: MuleSoft / iPaaS, Dell Boomi, SAP PI/PO, Custom middleware, Point-to-point scripts, Message broker (Kafka, RabbitMQ), No dedicated middleware, Not sure / needs confirmation
      • Which three integrations would you classify as 'business critical' and why?
      • How are integration failures detected today—automated alerts, manual reconciliation, or after customer impact? Options: Automated alerts & monitoring, Basic logs reviewed periodically, Manual reconciliation, We discover on customer complaints, Unknown
      • Who is accountable for integration reliability—IT, a middleware team, or business application owners? Options: IT / Integration team, Application teams, Shared responsibility, Third-party vendor, Not clearly assigned
      • What maximum delay or data lateness can the business tolerate for critical flows (in minutes or hours)? Options: Near real-time (<5 min), Minutes (5–60), Hours (1–6), Up to 24 hours, More than 24 hours

      If the Data Were Honest — What Would It Say?

      • If your master data could speak, which hard truth would it confess—duplicates, missing attributes, wrong ownership, or outdated mappings?
      • Which data domains are most problematic today? Options: Customers, Suppliers, Items / SKUs, Chart of accounts, Employee records, Site/location master, Transactional data quality, Other
      • Do you have active data quality metrics or dashboards (completeness, duplicates, referential integrity)? Options: Comprehensive dashboards with trends, Ad-hoc reports, Only manual checks, No formal measurement, Unsure
      • Have you attempted a data migration or cleansing project in the last 24 months? What worked and what didn’t?
      • Who owns data governance and stewardship across master and transactional domains? Options: Central data governance team, Functional business owners, IT / Data team, No clear owners, Hybrid model
      • What tools do you use (MDM, data quality, ETL), if any? Options: MDM solution, Data quality tooling, ETL / ELT tools, Custom scripts, None, Unsure
      • How would you prioritize data fixes—what must be fixed before cutover vs. what can be remediated post‑go‑live?

      What Could an Ideal Cutover Save or Break?

      • When you picture cutover day, what’s the single worst-case scenario that keeps you up at night?
      • What is your acceptable system downtime window for go‑live? Options: Less than 1 hour, 1–4 hours, 4–12 hours, 12–24 hours, More than 24 hours
      • Are there blackout periods we must avoid (month-end, quarter-end, seasonality)? Select all that apply. Options: Month‑end close, Quarter‑end close, Year‑end / fiscal close, Peak sales season, Payroll run windows, No blackout windows, Other
      • How many full dress rehearsals / cutover dry runs have you executed in the last 2 years? Options: None, 1, 2–3, 4–6, More than 6, Unsure
      • What rollback criteria would force you to abort a cutover and revert to the legacy environment?
      • Who would sit in the cutover command center and who has final sign‑off to proceed/abort?
      • Which business processes must be fully operational immediately after go‑live (top 3)?

      People, Power, and Change — Who Decides and Who Resists?

      • Who inside your organization has the most to lose from a move to a new ERP, and how do they typically express resistance?
      • Who are the formal sponsors and budget holders for this program? Options: CIO, CFO, COO, Business Unit Leader, Head of Supply Chain, Shared sponsorship, Other
      • Is there an executive steering committee or program governance model today? If so, describe composition and cadence.
      • Where do you anticipate the biggest adoption gaps—roles, geographies, or functions? Options: Finance teams, Supply chain / operations, Manufacturing / plant, Sales / order entry, Regional offices, Third‑party users / suppliers, Other
      • What learning and training approaches have worked best historically (classroom, train‑the‑trainer, online, role‑based simulations)? Options: Instructor‑led classroom, Train‑the‑trainer, eLearning / modules, Role‑based hands‑on simulations, On‑the‑job coaching, Blended learning, Other
      • How available are your subject matter experts during implementation? Options: Fully available (dedicated), Part-time availability, Over-allocated across projects, Not assigned yet, We need vendor support
      • Who outside IT must be convinced that this change is worth the disruption (list roles and their biggest concerns)?

      Risk, Cost, and the Measures That Matter

      • What hidden cost or complication has surprised you most on previous ERP projects?
      • How do you currently treat requested customizations—strict guardrails, pragmatic exceptions, or open to heavy tailoring? Options: Strict guardrails (minimal customization), Pragmatic exceptions, Flexible / customization friendly, No formal policy
      • What is your internal tolerance for change orders as a percent of initial scope (choose the closest)? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–40%, >40%, No predefined tolerance
      • Which regulatory, security, or compliance requirements must we design for (select all that apply)? Options: SOX / financial controls, GDPR / data privacy, HIPAA, PCI‑DSS, ITAR / export controls, Industry-specific regulations, None / not applicable, Other
      • Describe the most sensitive system or dataset we must avoid disrupting or exposing during migration.
      • What contingency budget or timeline buffer do you typically protect for large platform projects? Options: No buffer, 5–10% budget / 1–3 months, 10–20% budget / 3–6 months, 20%+ budget / 6+ months, Undecided

      Small Experiments, Big Confidence — What's the Safest Way Forward?

      • If you had to prove value in 90 days, what small process or dataset would you pick as a pilot to demonstrate measurable impact?
      • What success metrics would convince executives this pilot is ready to scale? Options: Cycle time reduction, Error reduction (%), Cost savings, User adoption / task completion, Data quality improvement, On-time delivery / SLA improvements
      • Which business stakeholders must be involved in a pilot decision and sign-off? Options: Finance lead, Operations lead, IT / Architecture, Supply Chain lead, HR / People lead, CFO / CIO
      • What minimum dataset or number of transactions would give the pilot statistical credibility? Options: Small sample (under 1k txns), Medium (1k–10k txns), Large (>10k txns), By time window (e.g., 30 days), Unsure — need to explore
      • How quickly could your team commit resources to a tightly scoped pilot (choose one)? Options: Immediately (within 2 weeks), In a month, In 2–3 months, Longer than 3 months, Unsure
      • What would be the single easiest win from a pilot that would change stakeholder sentiment in your favor?

      Realities to Align On — Next Steps and Practical Constraints

      • What timeline do you feel is realistic for a full transformation from kickoff to stabilized operations? Options: 6–9 months, 9–18 months, 18–36 months, Multi-year phased program, Unsure / depends on scope
      • Which internal approvals or milestones must occur before we can begin discovery workshops?
      • What internal reporting cadence will we be expected to follow (weekly, monthly, executive checkpoints)? Options: Weekly, Biweekly, Monthly, Ad-hoc as needed, Executive milestones only
      • Who needs to be in the room for our initial discovery workshops (roles, not names)?
      • What would you like us to deliver at the end of this Current State Mapping stage (select all that apply)? Options: Landscape inventory & dependency map, Integration catalog and risk matrix, Data quality assessment & remediation plan, Cutover & rollback constraints, Resourcing and governance recommendations, Pilot definition and quick-win roadmap
      • Finally, what concerns do you have about our asking these deep questions—what would make this conversation safer or more productive for your team?
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define measurable business outcomes, acceptable downtime, risk tolerances, and user adoption targets.

    Discovery Questions

    Opening: What's Most Important Right Now?

    • What's the single most important objective for this ERP initiative right now? Options: Reduce operating cost, Shorten month-end close, Improve inventory accuracy, Consolidate post-merger systems, Replace unsupported legacy ERP, Modernize operations and reporting, Other
    • What timeline are you actively targeting for an initial go-live or primary milestone? Options: 0–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–18 months, 18–24 months, 24+ months
    • How would you describe the current budget posture for this program? Options: Committed and approved, Budgeted but pending approval, Estimated range under review, Under business case development, No budget yet
    • Who is the executive sponsor and how engaged are they today? Options: Weekly active sponsor, Monthly engaged sponsor, Sponsor identified but not engaged, No sponsor yet
    • Tell us one short story that best explains why you must do this now.

    If This Project Fails, What Keeps You Up At Night?

    • What would be the single most damaging consequence if the implementation didn’t meet expectations? Options: Revenue loss, Regulatory breach / compliance issue, Major operational downtime, Severe cost overrun, Loss of customer trust, Executive leadership impact, Other
    • How do you quantify that potential damage (e.g., $/hour, lost sales, fines)? Give an example.
    • Have you lived through a similarly painful program before? Briefly describe what went wrong.
    • During cutover, what worst-case daily or hourly impact would you still accept? Select the band closest to reality. Options: Less than $10k/day, $10k–$100k/day, $100k–$500k/day, More than $500k/day, Undefined
    • How tolerant is your board or CEO of schedule slips or budget increases on projects like this? Options: Very tolerant, Somewhat tolerant, Low tolerance, Not tolerant at all

    If You Had to Show the Board a Win in 12 Months, What Would Make Them Proud?

    • What are the top three measurable business outcomes you'd present as evidence of success at month 12?
    • Which outcome categories should we treat as highest priority? (select up to 3) Options: Shorter month-end close, Reduced order-to-cash days, Improved inventory turns, Lower operating costs, Faster reporting/analytics, Improved compliance/control (SOX), Improved customer fulfillment, Other
    • For each priority outcome, please provide the current baseline and the target (metric name, current value → target value).
    • What time horizons do you expect for each outcome to be realized? Options: 0–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, 24+ months
    • Who in the business (by role) will own measuring and reporting each of those outcomes?

    Will Your People Use the New System—or Find Ways Around It?

    • Which user groups are most likely to resist using the new ERP, and why do you expect that resistance? Options: Finance, Supply chain / warehouse, Manufacturing floor, Sales / commercial, HR / payroll, IT, Third-party partners, Other
    • Approximately what percentage of your day-to-day processes are currently manual or spreadsheet-driven that you expect to eliminate? Options: <10%, 10–25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, 75–100%
    • What concrete adoption target would you set for core users at 6 months (examples: % daily active users, % transactions processed in system)?
    • Which training and enablement approaches have historically worked best here (select all that apply)? Options: Role-based classroom, Virtual instructor-led, On-the-job coaching, Microlearning modules, Train-the-trainer, Job aids / playbooks, Other
    • What incentives, governance or changes (e.g., removing legacy tools) will enforce adoption rather than optional use?

    What Parts of Your Business Are Sacred—and Can't Be Disrupted?

    • Which processes, periods or functions are absolutely non-negotiable for uptime (list the top items and why they’re critical)? Options: Payroll processing, Month-end close, Quarter/Year-end reporting, Peak sales season, Manufacturing production windows, Regulatory reporting windows, Other
    • Do you have blackout dates or business cycles where any cutover activity is forbidden? If so, list them and the reason.
    • Which legacy integrations, external partners, or vendor systems must remain operational or unchanged during and after cutover?
    • Do you rely on any custom code, reports or extensions that would be critical day-1 post-go-live? List and indicate criticality.
    • What performance SLAs (response time, throughput) are mandatory for key transactions after go-live? Options: <1s response for key transactions, <3s, <5s, No strict SLA defined, Other

    How Much Downtime Is Too Much?

    • If a full cutover caused X hours of downtime, what would be unacceptable for the business? Options: Zero downtime required, <4 hours, 4–12 hours, 12–24 hours, >24 hours
    • For each core domain (finance, supply chain, manufacturing, HR), what maximum downtime in hours would you accept during cutover?
    • Which cutover approach do you prefer and why: big-bang, phased by module, phased by site/region, or hybrid? Options: Big-bang (all at once), Phased by module, Phased by site/region, Hybrid approach
    • What contingency processes or manual workarounds exist if a critical system is unavailable longer than planned?
    • Who has the final authority to pause or proceed during the cutover window? Options: CEO, CIO, CFO, Program Sponsor, Steering Committee Chair, Site/Region Leader, Other

    If We Asked for ‘Enough’ Data Quality, How Good Is Good Enough?

    • Would you be willing to go live with 90% data accuracy in master/reference data for some domains, or must it be near perfect? Options: Yes, acceptable for selected domains, Yes, acceptable across all domains, No, prefer >95%, No, must be 100%, Unsure
    • Which data domains require the highest accuracy and why? (select all that apply) Options: GL/Chart of accounts, Customer master, Vendor master, Item master / BOM, Pricing and discounts, Employee / payroll data, Other
    • What percent of transactional history do you need migrated (e.g., full history, last 3 years, year-to-date) and why? Options: Full history, Last 3 years, Year-to-date, Last 12 months, Other
    • What reconciliation or manual remediation processes are acceptable immediately after go-live to bridge data gaps?
    • Who must sign off on data readiness before we call go/no-go?

    Who Can Pull the Emergency Brake?

    • Who is authorized to stop a go-live or escalate a critical production issue immediately? Options: CEO, CIO, CFO, Program Sponsor, Steering Committee, Site/Region Leader, Other
    • Which governance forums will review readiness and at what cadence (e.g., steering committee, release board, readiness review)? Options: Weekly steering committee, Biweekly steering, Monthly executive review, Pre-go/no-go release board, Daily during cutover, Other
    • What mandatory artifacts must be in place for go/no-go (select all that apply)? Options: UAT sign-off, Full regression pass, Data migration validation, Training completion evidence, Performance testing results, Cutover runbook, Other
    • What decision SLA should apply when a major defect is found during cutover (how quickly must leadership decide)? Options: <1 hour, 1–4 hours, 4–24 hours, 24+ hours, No defined SLA
    • How should disagreements between business and IT be escalated and resolved during critical windows?

    What Does Success Look Like in the First 90 Days?

    • Which top 5 metrics will you watch daily or weekly during hypercare to decide if we’re on track?
    • What service levels and response times do you require for critical incident handling post-go-live? Options: Critical: 1 hour, High: 4 hours, Medium: 24 hours, Low: 72 hours, Other
    • Which business processes must be demonstrably stable within 30 days to consider the release successful?
    • How will we measure user confidence and the reduction of manual workarounds (select measurement types)? Options: User satisfaction surveys, Number of open incidents, Time-to-resolution, Reduction in manual spreadsheets, Transaction completion rates, Other
    • In the first 90 days, do you expect focus to be stabilization only, or stabilization plus feature delivery? Explain. Options: Stabilize only, Stabilize then minor features, Stabilize and continue new features

    If You Were To Say Yes Today, What Would Give You Confidence?

    • What specific evidence or assurances would make you comfortable committing to this program now? Options: Fixed scope and price, Named consultant profiles and CVs, Guaranteed go-live window, Detailed risk mitigation & contingency plans, Strong reference calls from similar projects, Other
    • What consultant profiles or experience are non-negotiable (years of experience, certifications, industry familiarity)? Options: Program / engagement lead (senior), Solution architect, Senior functional consultant, Data migration lead, Change management lead, Integration / middleware architect, Other
    • Which of timeline, scope, or cost is your organization most willing to flex if trade-offs are necessary? Options: Timeline, Scope, Cost, None—all non-negotiable, Depends on impact
    • Who else inside your organization must be convinced before a signed commitment (roles or groups)?
    • What would you want as the immediate next step from our team to increase your confidence (select all that apply)? Options: Detailed roadmap & milestones, Proof-of-concept or pilot, Reference calls and case studies, Commercial proposal / SOW, Executive alignment workshop, Resource CVs & benchcheck, Other
  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through how the proposed ERP approach delivers the customer’s outcomes using real processes and cutover scenarios.

    Experience Meetings

    • Pre-Experience Alignment (Current State, Consequence, Future State)
    • Finance Process Experience: Record-to-Report & Close Cutover
    • Supply Chain & Manufacturing Experience: Order-to-Cash, Procurement, and WIP Cutover
    • Cutover Rehearsal Planning & Risk Tolerance Workshop
    • Outcome Validation & Sign-off Simulation
    • Assign command-center roles and rehearsal schedule to validate the plan.
    • Assign testing scenarios and schedule UAT walkthrough for finance close.
    • Restate Target Consequence & Future State for Supply Chain
    • Prove the proposed approach achieves targeted supply chain KPIs in a simulated/real-data scenario.
    • Confirm interface reconciliation approach and acceptance criteria for EDI and integration cutover.
    • Document required cleanup or mapping exceptions to address before migration.
    • Customer to provide sample EDI files, open order list, and WIP snapshots for deeper mapping.
    • Seller to supply integration reconciliation scripts and a test plan for the open-order cutover.
    • Schedule a technical session with integration architects to resolve outstanding interface gaps.
    • Review Draft Cutover Runbook
    • Finalize a single cutover runbook with named owners and timeboxes.
    • Agree go/no-go criteria, rollback thresholds, and acceptable downtime metrics.
    • Introductions & Purpose
    • Seller to update runbook with agreed failure modes and produce an owner RACI.
    • Customer to confirm executive-approved downtime window and rollback authority.
    • Set rehearsal dates and prepare smoke-test scripts mapped to acceptance criteria.
    • Recap Current State, Consequence & Future State
    • Demonstrate measurable proof that the solution meets the agreed future-state KPIs.
    • Obtain explicit customer validation and signed scenario acceptance for inclusion in scope.
    • Confirm follow-up items required to reach full readiness and update SOW/milestones as needed.
    • Customer to sign the scenario acceptance document or provide documented objections within 3 business days.
    • Seller to deliver a validation report showing KPI baselines, test results, and remaining gap list.
    • If gaps remain, create remediation plan with owners and deadlines prior to UAT scheduling.
    • Lock a one-sentence current-state that all stakeholders acknowledge.
    • Agree measurable consequence metrics to use during the experience.
    • Define a single one-line future-state outcome the solution must prove.
    • Select concrete processes and cutover scenarios to demo using customer data.
    • Identify and assign pre-work artifacts with due dates.
    • Customer to deliver sample data extracts and current runbook for chosen scenarios within 5 business days.
    • Seller to draft the agreed current-state, consequence metrics, and future-state one-liners and circulate for confirmation.
    • Assign SME owners for each selected process/cutover scenario and schedule walkthrough sessions.
    • Recap Current State & Consequence
    • Validate the solution flow eliminates the finance-close pain points tied to the consequence metrics.
    • Agree detailed cutover steps, owners, and acceptance criteria for close-day.
    • Capture any technical or process gaps that must be resolved before UAT.
    • Seller to produce a close-day runbook draft with timeboxes and sign-off checkpoints.
    • Customer finance SME to validate sample migrated journals and reconciliation results.
    • Failure Modes & Contingency Actions
    • Show Proof: KPI Before/After Using Sample Data
    • CRISP Current-State Statement
    • Walk Current Process with Customer Examples
    • Current Process Walk with Live Examples
    • Walk Targeted Acceptance Tests
    • Quantify Consequence
    • Solution Steps That Prove Improvement
    • Define Downtime Window & SLA Expectations
    • Solution Mapping to Future State
    • Command Center Roles & Decision Gates
    • Integration & Cutover Scenario: Open Orders and WIP
    • One-Line Future-State Outcome
    • Cutover Simulation: Close Day Execution
    • Customer Validation & Clarifying Questions
    • Rehearsal Plan & Acceptance Tests
    • Select Real Processes & Cutover Scenarios
    • Validation & Forced Confirmation
    • Sign-off, Scope Updates & Next Steps
    • Validation Questions & Sign-Off
    • Gaps, Risks & Next Steps
    • Pre-Work & Data Checklist
  4. Solution Scope

    Define modules, integrations, data migration boundaries, customization limits, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.

    Scope Configuration

    • Configure General Ledger and Chart of Accounts
    • Configure Accounts Payable and Payment Processing
    • Configure Accounts Receivable and Billing
    • Migrate Master Data: Customers, Vendors, Items
    • Load Opening Balances and Historical Transactions
    • Configure Inventory Management and Warehouse Processes
    • Implement Manufacturing BOM and Work Order Processing
    • Develop and Deploy System Integrations and APIs
    • Build Supplier EDI and External Interfaces
    • Develop Role-Based Security and Access Controls
    • Execute Unit, Integration, UAT, and Performance Testing
    • Deliver Role-Based End-User Training Sessions
    • Execute Cutover, Data Reconciliation, and Go-Live
    • Operate Go-Live Command Center and Hypercare Support

    Scope Questions

    Configure General Ledger and Chart of Accounts

    • Do you plan to adopt a new chart of accounts or adapt your existing COA? Options: New COA, Adapt existing, Hybrid / phased
    • How many legal entities / ledgers will be configured in scope? Options: 1, 2-5, 6-20, 20+
    • Which reporting standards must GL support? Options: US GAAP, IFRS, Local GAAP, Multiple / Custom
    • Do you require multicurrency accounting, consolidations, or intercompany accounting? Options: Yes - multicurrency, Yes - consolidation, Yes - intercompany, No
    • Are there existing legal/regulatory charting or tax requirements that constrain COA design? Options: Yes, No
    • Acceptance criteria for GL and COA configuration (report examples, balance matches, period close performance):

    Configure Accounts Payable and Payment Processing

    • Should AP include automated invoice capture/OCR or manual entry only? Options: Automated capture/OCR, Manual entry only, Hybrid
    • Which payment methods and channels must be supported? Options: ACH, Wire, Check, Credit Card, Supplier Portal / E-payments
    • What is the expected monthly invoice volume to process through AP? Options: <1,000, 1,000-10,000, 10,000-50,000, 50,000+
    • Do you require 2- or 3-way match, PO-based matching, or non-PO invoice workflows? Options: 3-way match (PO, GR, Invoice), 2-way match (PO, Invoice), Non-PO invoice workflow, Mixed
    • Is integration with bank or payment gateway required (e.g., for file transmission / direct send)? Options: Yes, No
    • Controls and approval thresholds needed for AP (SOD, spend limits, delegated approvers):

    Configure Accounts Receivable and Billing

    • What billing models must the system support? Options: Recurring/subscription, Project-based, Usage/consumption, One-time invoicing, Mixed
    • How are invoices delivered to customers? Options: Email PDF, Customer portal/e-invoice, EDI, Paper, Other
    • Do you require credit checks, credit limits, and automated dunning processes? Options: Yes - credit checks and dunning, Yes - only credit limits, No
    • Is integration to cash application, lockbox, or payment reconciling services required? Options: Yes, No
    • Are specific revenue recognition (e.g., ASC 606) or revenue deferral rules required? Options: Yes, No
    • Acceptance criteria for AR/billing readiness (examples: successful invoice cycle, cash application % automated):

    Migrate Master Data: Customers, Vendors, Items

    • Which source systems hold your master data that must be migrated? Options: Legacy ERP, CRM, Spreadsheets, Specialized systems, Other
    • Estimated record counts for Customers, Vendors, and Items: Options: Customers <1k, Customers 1k-10k, Customers 10k+, Vendors <1k, Vendors 1k+, Items <5k, Items 5k-50k, Items 50k+
    • Which common data quality issues must be remediated prior to load? Options: Duplicates, Missing fields, Inconsistent IDs, Invalid pricing/units, Other
    • Do you have or need master data governance and deduplication rules to be defined? Options: Client has governance + rules, Client needs assistance defining rules, No governance required
    • Are there required relationships/attributes (e.g., customer hierarchies, item BOM links, vendor bank details) that must be preserved? Options: Yes, No
    • Acceptance criteria for master data migration (error thresholds, reconciliation approach):

    Load Opening Balances and Historical Transactions

    • What historical depth do you need migrated? Options: Opening balances only, Current year transactions, Last 3 years, Last 7+ years / full history
    • Will you provide final trial balance and subledger exports for reconciliation? Options: Yes - GL + subledgers, Partial (GL only), No / need extraction help
    • What formats are your historical data extracts available in? Options: GL export, Subledger CSV/Excel, Database dump, Other
    • Preferred timing for final balance load relative to go-live (e.g., T-1 day, T-7 days): Options: T-1 day, T-7 days, T-30 days, Other
    • Who will own reconciliation sign-off between legacy and new system? Options: Client-owned, Consultant-assisted, Joint ownership
    • Tolerance / acceptance criteria for balance reconciliation and transaction migration:

    Configure Inventory Management and Warehouse Processes

    • How many warehouses / inventory locations are in scope? Options: 1, 2-5, 6-20, 20+
    • Do you require lot, batch, or serial number tracking? Options: Lot tracking, Serial tracking, Batch tracking, None
    • Which inventory valuation method(s) are used? Options: FIFO, LIFO, Weighted Average, Standard Cost, Other
    • Is integration to WMS, barcode scanners, or automated equipment required? Options: Yes - WMS, Yes - barcode/mobile, No
    • What physical inventory controls are required (cycle counts frequency, tolerances)? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Custom
    • Any special inventory attributes to support (expiration dates, temperature control, hazardous classifications)? Options: Yes, No

    Implement Manufacturing BOM and Work Order Processing

    • What manufacturing type best describes your operations? Options: Discrete, Process, Batch, Engineer-to-order / ETO, Mixed
    • Typical BOM depth/levels and complexity: Options: Single-level, 2-3 levels, 4-6 levels, 6+ levels
    • Do you require routings, work centers, and capacity planning / MRP? Options: Yes - full MRP and routing, Yes - basic work orders, No
    • Is shop-floor data capture / MES integration required (time and attendance, confirmations)? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you need quality inspections, hold processes, or non-conformance workflows embedded in WOs? Options: Yes, No
    • Acceptance criteria for manufacturing processes (e.g., successful batch build, BOM accuracy):

    Develop and Deploy System Integrations and APIs

    • Which systems must integrate with the ERP (select all that apply)? Options: CRM, PLM, WMS, Payroll/HCM, Banking/Treasury, Custom apps, Other
    • Do integrations need to be real-time, near real-time, or batch? Options: Real-time / synchronous, Near-real-time / streaming, Scheduled batch
    • Approximate number of interfaces/APIs to deliver: Options: 1-5, 6-15, 16+
    • Is there an existing iPaaS / middleware standard (e.g., Boomi, Mulesoft) to use? Options: Yes - name provided, No - choose during design
    • Authentication and security requirements for integrations (e.g., OAuth, client certs, VPN): Options: OAuth / token, Client certificates, VPN / private network, IP allowlist, Other
    • Operational SLAs and error handling expectations for interfaces:

    Build Supplier EDI and External Interfaces

    • Do you have active EDI trading partners to onboard? Options: Yes, No
    • Which EDI standards and message types are required? Options: ANSI X12, EDIFACT, Custom / Proprietary
    • How many trading partner mappings/messages are expected (rough count)? Options: 1-3, 4-10, 10+
    • Will you use a VAN/AS2 provider or direct AS2/FTP connections? Options: VAN, AS2 / direct, Other
    • Do trading partners require formal testing/certification (and do you hold partner contact details)? Options: Yes - certification required, No, Unknown / need to collect
    • Acceptance criteria for EDI (successful exchanges, partner sign-off, error rates):

    Develop Role-Based Security and Access Controls

    • How many distinct user roles or personas must be defined? Options: 1-5, 6-20, 20+
    • Do you require a formal Segregation of Duties (SoD) matrix and remediation? Options: Yes - build matrix, No - minimal SoD, We have matrix already
    • Is Single Sign-On / Identity Provider integration required (SAML, OIDC)? Options: Yes, No
    • Are there regulatory or audit logging requirements (field-level auditing, access logs)? Options: Yes, No
    • Do any roles require data masking or restricted field-level visibility? Options: Yes, No
    • Acceptance criteria for security / access (role tests, SSO success, audit logs):
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, governance, milestone commitments, consultant profiles, and readiness prerequisites.

    Agreement Modules

    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Commercial Terms & Pricing Schedule
    • Project Governance Charter
    • Milestone Commitments & Acceptance Criteria
    • Resource Plan & Consultant Profiles
    • Data Migration & Cutover Readiness Prerequisites
    • Integration & Third-Party Software Addendum
    • Security, Privacy & Data Processing Agreement (DPA)
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA) & Performance Guarantees
    • Change Control & Scope Management Agreement
    • Payment Schedule & Invoicing Terms
    • Training, Transition & Knowledge Transfer Plan
    • Support, Hypercare & Post-Go-Live Maintenance
    • Insurance, Indemnity & Liability Schedule
    • Termination, Exit & Transition Agreement
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Validate data extracts, environments, access, test plans, and cutover runbooks ahead of scheduling go-live.

      Readiness Questions

      Getting Ready Together — your timeline and stakes

      • What is your current target go-live window for this ERP deployment? Options: Next 30 days, 30–60 days, 60–90 days, 3–6 months, 6+ months, TBD
      • How confident are you, on a scale from 'fully confident' to 'we're stretching the date', that this window is realistic? Options: Fully confident, Mostly confident, Moderately confident, Uncertain, Date driven by external mandate
      • Who is the executive sponsor(s) we should align with for final approval, and what are their top concerns about this timing?
      • If the go-live slips 30 days, which business outcomes or financial metrics would be most at risk? Options: Revenue recognition, Month/quarter close, Supply continuity, Payroll/HR operations, Regulatory/compliance deadlines, Other
      • Has the board or CFO placed any hard constraints (budget caps, blackout periods, audit windows) that limit our scheduling flexibility? Options: Yes—budget cap, Yes—blackout/seasonal window, Yes—audit/ compliance window, No hard constraints, Unsure

      If We Go Live Tomorrow, What Would Break?

      • If we flipped the switch tomorrow, which three processes do you expect would fail first or cause the biggest disruption?
      • How long is the business willing to tolerate degraded capability in those processes before executive intervention? Options: Hours, One business day, Up to 3 days, Up to a week, Not acceptable
      • Which recent incident(s) (past 12–18 months) should inform our cutover risk planning—what happened and how was it handled?
      • Which single point of failure in your current landscape concerns you most (e.g., payroll batch, EDI, warehouse operations)? Options: Payroll, EDI/partner interfaces, WMS/warehouse, Manufacturing/MES, Finance close, Other
      • Who on your side is empowered to pause a go-live if things are deteriorating, and what criteria would they use?

      Where Does Your Data Live — and How Honest Are We About Its Quality?

      • Which data domains are mission-critical for cutover (select all that apply)? Options: AR/Customer master, AP/Supplier master, GL/Chart of accounts, Inventory/Items, Bills of Material, HR/Employee records, Other
      • What percent of those mission-critical data domains have been profiled and remediated to your standards? Options: 100%, 75–99%, 50–74%, 25–49%, Less than 25%, Not started
      • Do you have working sample extracts and reconciliation scripts we can run end-to-end before cutover? Options: Yes—complete and available, Partial extracts available, Scripts exist but not tested, No, not yet
      • Who are the appointed data owners for each critical domain (name or role) and how quickly can they resolve data defects during cutover?
      • What acceptance criteria must be met for migrated data (e.g., balance tolerance, duplicate thresholds, % completeness)?

      Who Actually Has the Keys — access, environments, and security

      • Are all required environments (dev, test, pre-prod, prod) provisioned and tagged for our cutover rehearsals? Options: All provisioned, Most provisioned, Only dev/test provisioned, Not provisioned
      • Which access or network dependencies could block our team from executing remote or onsite cutover activities (select all that apply)? Options: VPN/Network policies, Firewall rules, Privileged account provisioning, SAML/SSO configuration, Third‑party vendor access, None
      • How long does it take on average to approve a new privileged account or access request in your organization? Options: Same day, 1–3 days, 4–7 days, More than a week, Varies greatly
      • Who (role/title) will be the single point of contact for urgent access changes during rehearsals and cutover, and how reachable are they?
      • Are there compliance or audit controls (e.g., change freeze, segregation of duties) that will influence how we plan access during go-live? Options: Yes—strict controls, Yes—moderate controls, No special controls, Unsure

      Do Our Systems Breathe Together — integrations and external dependencies

      • How many external interfaces/third‑party integrations must be live at cutover? Options: 0–5, 6–15, 16–30, 30+
      • Which integrations are live-critical (real‑time or daily cutover dependencies) — please list systems or partners.
      • Is middleware (e.g., iPaaS, ESB) fully configured in pre-prod and connected to external partners for end‑to‑end testing? Options: Yes—fully connected, Partially connected, Not connected yet, No middleware
      • Do external partners/vendors support our rehearsal windows and have SLA commitments for cutover support? Options: Yes—all partners committed, Some partners committed, No formal commitments, Unsure
      • Who owns each integration end-to-end (internal role or vendor), and how quickly can they respond to a production interface failure?

      Can Your Tests Break It—and Let Us Fix It?

      • Do you currently have an end‑to‑end test plan that mirrors the cutover sequence and includes business-critical scenarios? Options: Yes—comprehensive, Partial coverage, Basic unit tests only, No end‑to‑end plan
      • How complete is your UAT user participation (percent of identified superusers who have signed up and executed scenarios)? Options: 100%, 75–99%, 50–74%, 25–49%, Less than 25%
      • Is performance/load testing completed for peak‑volume processes that will run during or immediately after cutover? Options: Yes—passed, Yes—issues found, Planned but not run, Not planned
      • Who will coordinate defect triage during rehearsals and cutover, and what is your target defect‑to‑resolve SLA during the window? Options: Same day, 48 hours, 5 business days, Depends on severity
      • Can we access realistic test data sets that include edge cases (high volume customers, suspended accounts, complex BOMs)? Options: Yes—comprehensive, Partial, No

      When Cutover Happens, Who’s in the Room?

      • Have you identified and confirmed the cutover command center roles (decision maker, technical lead, business lead, communications, escalation)? Options: Yes—all confirmed, Some roles confirmed, Roles not yet assigned
      • Who can make final acceptance calls during cutover (name/role), and are they available for the full window?
      • What communication channels should the command center use for real‑time updates (select all that apply)? Options: Phone bridge, Dedicated Slack/MS Teams channel, Email summaries, War room in person, Other
      • What time of day/day of week do you prefer to perform cutover activities to minimize business impact? Options: Weekend daytime, Weekend overnight, Weeknight overnight, End of month/quarter specific window, Other
      • Do you have a pre-approved list of emergency contacts and delegation rules should primary contacts be unavailable? Options: Yes—documented, Partial list, No

      What Will It Feel Like for Your People — adoption and support readiness

      • What percent of end users are scheduled to receive role‑based training before go‑live? Options: 100%, 75–99%, 50–74%, 25–49%, Less than 25%
      • Who are your trained superusers/champions by function, and how many are available during hypercare?
      • What is your preferred post‑go‑live support model for the first 30–90 days (select up to two)? Options: Onsite hypercare team, Remote command center, Hybrid onsite/remote, Dedicated helpdesk queue, Shared responsibility with vendor
      • How will business acceptance be measured day‑by‑day during hypercare (examples: transaction throughput, error rates, finance close timing)?
      • Which internal teams are likely to resist the new processes and will need targeted change management? Options: Finance, Supply chain/warehouse, Manufacturing, Sales/Order management, HR/Payroll, IT/Infrastructure

      If Everything Goes Wrong, What’s the Plan B?

      • What are your hard rollback thresholds (explicit metrics or conditions that would trigger reverting to legacy systems)?
      • Do you have verified backups and a documented restore procedure for critical data and configurations? Options: Yes—verified in pre-prod, Backups exist but not tested, No formal backups/process
      • What recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) apply to the most critical processes? Options: RTO < 1 hour, RTO 1–8 hours, RTO 8–24 hours, RTO > 24 hours, Not defined
      • Are there vendor escalation paths and guaranteed response SLAs if third‑party integrations fail during cutover? Options: Yes—documented SLAs, Informal commitments, No SLAs
      • Who in your executive team needs to be briefed immediately if we hit a major cutover incident, and how should we frame that communication?

      Last Check Before the Switch — go/no‑go criteria and next actions

      • Looking across environments, data, integrations, testing, people, and contingency plans, which single area gives you the least confidence right now? Options: Data migration, Integrations, Access/environments, Testing coverage, Org readiness/training, Contingency plans
      • What are the non‑negotiable go/no‑go criteria we must satisfy before locking the cutover date?
      • Which rehearsals or dress‑rehearsal milestones would you like to see completed and validated before we set a firm schedule? Options: Full end‑to‑end dress rehearsal, Data migration rehearsal, Integration smoke test, UAT signoff, Command center run
      • Realistically, what is the single next action you can commit to this week to increase readiness?
      • Who should receive the readiness summary and final go/no‑go checklist from our team, and how would you like that delivered? Options: Email with attachments, Live review meeting, Secure portal upload, Executive summary + meeting
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Coordinate detailed schedules, owners, cutover command center roles, and contingency plans for execution.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify end-to-end testing, performance benchmarks, and formal acceptance against the defined criteria.

      Validation Questions

      Getting Comfortable — Tell Us Where You Are

      • Which statement best describes why you’re pursuing an ERP change right now? Options: Replace aging/unsupported system, Consolidate after acquisition, First enterprise-wide ERP, Cost reduction / efficiency, Regulatory or compliance driver, Other
      • What is the target timeframe you and your leadership are expecting for selecting a partner and confirming a go-forward plan? Options: <3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–18 months, Undecided / exploratory
      • Tell us briefly about any prior attempts to modernize or migrate ERP capabilities—what happened and why it didn’t meet expectations?
      • Among cost, timeline, business disruption, and functionality, which single constraint feels most likely to derail this program if it isn’t managed? Options: Cost overruns, Timeline slips, Business disruption/cutover impact, Insufficient functionality, User adoption
      • Who in the C-suite will be most visible in sponsoring this program, and who else do we need to keep reassured during discovery?

      If This Keeps Going, What Breaks First?

      • Which specific process, report, or outcome do you expect to fail or materially degrade if the current ERP remains unchanged over the next 12–18 months?
      • How often do you encounter manual workarounds or spreadsheets because the system can’t handle a core process? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Never
      • Give an example of a recent operational issue that you traced back to the legacy system—what happened and what were the downstream effects?
      • How do these failures show up to your external stakeholders—customers, suppliers, auditors—and how often has that caused reputational or contractual risk? Options: Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely, Never
      • If we had to prioritize one business process to stabilize in the first 6 months, which should it be and why? Options: Order to cash, Procure to pay, Record to report, Manufacturing / production, HR / payroll, Other

      Hidden Costs and Silent Risks

      • Where are you quietly losing money, time, or credibility because of the current ERP—what’s the single most surprising cost you’ve uncovered?
      • Which of these cost categories are currently the largest drain on your operations? Options: Manual reconciliation labor, Inventory carrying costs, System downtime, Rework and corrections, Third-party integrations / middleware fees, Audit / compliance penalties
      • Estimate the annual dollar or FTE impact of those hidden costs (choose a range) — if unknown, select 'unsure' and explain. Options: <$100k, $100k–$500k, $500k–$2M, >$2M, Unsure—will need to calculate
      • Have there been recent audit findings, regulatory lapses, or supplier/customer SLA breaches tied to system limitations? Describe one example.
      • How willing is leadership to pay to remove these hidden costs vs. tolerate them for short-term cash preservation? Options: Highly willing, Somewhat willing, Only with strong ROI case, Prefer to delay

      Who Really Decides — and Who’s Quietly Resisting?

      • If the program were paused today, who in your organization would most forcefully argue to continue—and who would quietly push back?
      • Which roles or groups will need to sign off on technical architecture, functional scope, commercial terms, and go/no-go decisions? Options: CIO/CTO, CFO, Business Unit Heads, Procurement, Security/Compliance, Line-of-business operations, Other
      • Which stakeholder groups tend to underestimate the change impact on people and why (give a recent example if possible)?
      • How are you currently engaging internal change agents—do you have named process owners, data owners, and adoption champions? Options: All identified and engaged, Some identified, limited engagement, Not yet identified, Unsure
      • What would make your most skeptical stakeholder shift from resisting to supporting the program? Options: Clear ROI/benefit case, Proof-of-concept or pilot, Reference from similar peer, Low-risk phased approach, Guaranteed support and training

      What Would 'No Surprises' Look Like?

      • What single piece of evidence would satisfy your board or CFO that this program will avoid the ‘surprise’ outcomes you fear?
      • Which of these delivery guarantees would increase your confidence the most? Options: Fixed-price milestones, Time-and-materials with cap, Stage-gated approvals, Performance SLAs, Guaranteed consultant seniority
      • What is your acceptable threshold for cost variance and schedule variance before you expect an executive-level escalation? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, >20%
      • How frequently do you want formal program status and risk reviews once a project is underway? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Only at major milestones
      • Which artifacts or checkpoints would make you comfortable proceeding from discovery into design (pick top three)? Options: Executive decision matrix, Detailed business process map, Data readiness assessment, Validated staffing plan, Realistic cutover plan and runbook, Commercial milestone schedule

      Data: Truths, Myths, and Loose Ends

      • When you think about data quality and migration, what single nightmare scenario do you most want to prevent?
      • Which data domains require the most attention for migration and governance? Options: Master data (items, customers, vendors), Financial balances, Historical transactions, Bills of material / routings, Employee and payroll data, Other
      • Roughly how many integrations touch the ERP now (including batch extracts), and which are highest risk to migrate? Options: 0–5, 6–15, 16–50, >50, Unsure—need discovery
      • Do you have named data owners and documented data quality SLAs (if yes, point to the most recent gap)? Options: Yes—owners and SLAs, Partial—owners only, No formal owners/SLAs, Unsure
      • Would you prefer a big-bang migration, a hybrid phased approach, or a nearline coexistence strategy for high-risk domains? Options: Big-bang, Phased by module/region, Hybrid (parallel for critical domains), Nearline coexistence, Undecided—need guidance

      Cutover Night — Plan, Panic, or Performance?

      • Imagine go-live night goes wrong—what single failure would be catastrophic for your business continuity?
      • What maximum downtime window is acceptable for core transactional systems during cutover? Options: <2 hours, 2–8 hours, 8–24 hours, 24–72 hours, Cannot accept downtime
      • Which roles must be physically or virtually present in the cutover command center? Options: Program Director, Technical Architect, Business Process Owner, Data Migration Lead, Security/Network, Executive on-call
      • Have you run full end-to-end dress rehearsals for cutover before, and if so, what went wrong most recently? Options: Yes—multiple, with learnings, One full dress rehearsal, Partial simulations only, No full rehearsals
      • What contingency would you insist on including in the cutover plan to sleep at night (e.g., rollback plan, parallel processing, buffer days)? Options: Rollback plan, Parallel backstop, Extended hypercare, Phased switchovers, Additional vendor staffing

      Measuring Success — What Will Make You Smile?

      • Three months after go-live, what would you want to be able to say to the board that proves success?
      • Which KPIs should we track and report from day one to demonstrate value? Options: Invoice cycle time, Days sales outstanding (DSO), Inventory accuracy, Order lead time, First-pass quality, User adoption rates, System availability
      • What adoption targets would make you confident the organization has embraced the new system (select ranges)? Options: >90% active users on new system, 75–90%, 50–75%, <50%
      • How long of a hypercare window do you anticipate needing after go-live, and what would justify extending it? Options: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8–12 weeks, Quarterly phased hypercare
      • What would you like us to capture as the single most important lesson learned at the end of the program?
  7. Success

    Confirm delivered outcomes, capture lessons learned, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Outcomes Confirmation Review
    • Lessons Learned Workshop
    • Operational Handover & Shared Channel Setup
    • Enhancement Backlog & Prioritization Session
    • Executive Closeout & Value Realization Review

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Publish the prioritized backlog with value/effort scores and proposed delivery windows.
    • Assign clear owners and timelines for each improvement action.
    • Create a plan to share insights with governance, delivery teams, and future projects.
    • Draft and circulate a Lessons Learned report summarizing findings, root causes, and recommended actions.
    • Create an improvement backlog with owners, priorities, and due dates tracked in the program tool.
    • Schedule a follow-up review to confirm progress on improvement actions.
    • Handover Objectives & Scope
    • Provision and confirm access to a shared issue/enhancement channel with clear roles and SLAs.
    • Agree handover boundaries, support responsibilities, and escalation paths.
    • Ensure operational teams have the runbooks, documentation, and KT required to operate independently.
    • Provision the shared channel, add required users, and publish channel playbook and naming conventions.
    • Publish support roster, SLAs, and escalation contacts into the support portal.
    • Deliver final runbooks and schedule remaining KT sessions; confirm recordings uploaded.
    • Purpose & Prioritization Framework
    • Create a prioritized, actionable enhancement backlog aligned to business value.
    • Agree a tentative roadmap and identify funding/governance decisions required.
    • Establish a repeatable intake and prioritization process for future requests.
    • Welcome & Objectives
    • Capture items requiring executive funding and prepare approval materials.
    • Document the intake form/process and schedule recurring backlog grooming cadence.
    • Executive Summary of Delivery & Acceptance
    • Secure executive acknowledgment of delivered value and formal project close or conditional continuation.
    • Agree funding and governance for any next-phase investments or enhancements.
    • Finalize executive communications and stakeholder messaging for the organization.
    • Prepare and distribute an executive summary deck with KPI comparisons and financial reconciliation.
    • Circulate requests for any executive approvals and track decision deadlines.
    • Publish the executive communications plan and schedule stakeholder briefings.
    • Confirm which acceptance criteria are met and which remain open.
    • Obtain formal acceptance signature or an agreed remediation plan with owners and dates.
    • Ensure a clear, time-bound path to resolve any outstanding gaps.
    • Produce and distribute a formal acceptance certificate or conditional acceptance memo.
    • Create remediation tickets for each open criterion with owner, due date, and success criteria.
    • Schedule remediation checkpoints and a follow-up acceptance review.
    • Framing & Ground Rules
    • Document a prioritized set of actionable lessons and process improvements.
    • Recap of Agreed Success Criteria
    • Project Timeline Walk-Through
    • Value Realization Metrics
    • Review Submitted Enhancements
    • Support Model & SLAs
    • Value vs Effort Scoring
    • Financial Reconciliation
    • Evidence Package Summary
    • What Worked Well (Brainstorm)
    • Shared Channel Platform & Access
    • What Didn't Work (Brainstorm)
    • Gap & Issue Review
    • Roadmap Draft & Funding Decisions
    • Triage & Escalation Process
    • Executive Risks & Decisions
    • Root Cause Analysis
    • Runbooks and Operational Playbooks
    • Governance & Intake Process
    • Next-Phase Roadmap & Ask
    • Customer Validation & Signaling
    • Improvement Actions & Ownership
    • Knowledge Transfer & Documentation Handoff
    • Acceptance Decision or Remediation Agreement
    • Approvals & Communications Plan
    • Close & Distribution Plan
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.